Re: [jira] [Commented] (ISIS-772) Reimplement WrapperFactory to use javassist instead of cglib/asm (for Java7 support)

2014-05-06 Thread Dan Haywood
Hi Oscar, I don't think I explained myself well enough. If the domain object has modifyXxx() and setXxx(), then calling: this.wrap(domainObject).setXXX(...); will in fact cause the modifyXxx() method to be called rather than the setXxx() one. That is, the proxy looks for the PropertySetterF

Re: ISIS Login page modifications

2014-05-06 Thread Dan Haywood
The Wicket viewer uses a PageClassList to acts as a catalogue of the various different page types. The example todo app shows [1] how to configure a custom page list. The configured page list [2] simply delegates back to the superclass. So, copy in the same configuration in your application subc

Re: ISIS-Shiro isPermitted issue

2014-05-06 Thread Dan Haywood
Hi Ranganath, I can't reproduce this issue; Shiro permissions seem to work as expected for me. What I did to check is as follows: Using the todo app, I updated realm1.ini and realm2.ini (in webapp/src/main/resources): self-install_role = *:ToDoItemsFixturesService:installFixtures:*,\

Re: Paramter parsing ....

2014-05-06 Thread Dan Haywood
Hi Ola, I think I either need a test case, or we could do a remote desktop session one evening. Contact me offline if you want to do the latter. Cheers Dan On Friday, 2 May 2014, Tomoloju, Ola wrote: > Good day Dan, > Trust you are doing well. > I have just come back to this issue, and tha

ISIS Login page modifications

2014-05-06 Thread chittari.varma
Hi, Could you please let me know how to change the Login page. Currently it has two fields user name and password. I want to add one more field to this page. How is it possible? Br Ranganath Varma The information contained in this electronic message and any attachments to this message are inten

Re: [jira] [Commented] (ISIS-772) Reimplement WrapperFactory to use javassist instead of cglib/asm (for Java7 support)

2014-05-06 Thread GESCONSULTOR - Óscar Bou
Hi Dan. Many thanks for pointing this :-)) Excuse me I didn't read it before. All seems ok for us, but when you say that the modifyXXX cannot be invoked (as seen on the TodoItem.modifyDescription(...) test in [1]) this can break some code for us. Let me explain. We normally use: this.wrap(d