Greetings,
I swapped out a stock Broadcom wifi card for an Intel 3945 card and now my
Wifi indicator light blinks continually. I tried some of the
recommendations that I've found (create an /etc/modprobe.d/iwlwifi.conf
file with the line:
options iwlwifi led_mode=1
Subsequent rebo
Hi,
I'm using Fedora 21 with XFCE desktop.
Is there a way to connect to WPS networks? NetworkManager doesn't show
an obvious option for it and the only option I see so far is this hack:
http://askubuntu.com/questions/120367/how-to-connect-to-wi-fi-ap-through-wps
Not very user-friendly interface f
On 02/03/2015 07:31 AM, poma wrote:
On 02.02.2015 20:52, Stephen Morris wrote:
I issued this command which didn't display much, but the output is
below. The first line is very interesting.
Couldn't open device, some information will be missing
bcdUSB 2.10
bcdDevice
w USB device found, idVendor=0e8d, idProduct=7610
> [ 192.473989] usb 2-2: New USB device strings: Mfr=1, Product=2,
> SerialNumber=3
> [ 192.473993] usb 2-2: Product: WiFi
> [ 192.473996] usb 2-2: Manufacturer: MediaTek
> [ 192.473999] usb 2-2: SerialNumber: 1.0
>
> An
0
bDeviceProtocol 0
bMaxPacketSize064
idVendor 0x0e8d MediaTek Inc.
idProduct 0x7610
bcdDevice1.00
iManufacturer 1 MediaTek
iProduct2 WiFi
iSerial 3 1.0
bNumConfigurations 1
On 30.05.2015, jd1008 wrote:
> I will be getting back to the vendor and try to get my money back.
Before you do, would you mind posting the output of
lsusb -v -d 0e8d:7610
and the last ~15 lines of the "dmesg" output after plugging in the
device and having done a "dmesg --clear" prior to tha
On 05/29/2015 03:06 PM, Heinz Diehl wrote:
On 29.05.2015, jd1008 wrote:
[ 192.473984] usb 2-2: New USB device found, idVendor=0e8d, idProduct=7610
This is the RT2860 chipset, and not an RT55xx.
AFAIK, it's not yet supported.
Trying to compile the vendor's support for the chipset you site
On 05/29/2015 03:06 PM, Heinz Diehl wrote:
On 29.05.2015, jd1008 wrote:
[ 192.473984] usb 2-2: New USB device found, idVendor=0e8d, idProduct=7610
This is the RT2860 chipset, and not an RT55xx.
AFAIK, it's not yet supported.
What a total bummer!!!
I will be getting back to the vendor and
On 29.05.2015, jd1008 wrote:
> [ 192.473984] usb 2-2: New USB device found, idVendor=0e8d, idProduct=7610
This is the RT2860 chipset, and not an RT55xx.
AFAIK, it's not yet supported.
--
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
https://a
: Product: WiFi
[ 192.473996 ] usb 2-2: Manufacturer: MediaTek
[ 192.473999 ] usb 2-2: SerialNumber: 1.0
And since the file
drivers/net/wireless/rt2x00/Kconfig
has the following config line:
config RT2800USB_RT55XX
bool "rt2800usb - Include support for rt55xx devices (EXPERIMENTAL)"
[ 192.344054 ] usb 2-2: new high-speed USB device
number 5 using ehci-pci
[ 192.473984 ] usb 2-2: New USB device found,
idVendor=0e8d, idProduct=7610
[ 192.473989 ] usb 2-2: New USB device strings: Mfr=1,
Product=2,
SerialNumber=3
[ 192.473993 ] usb 2-2: Product: WiFi
[ 192.473996 ] usb 2-2
high-speed USB device number 5 using ehci-pci
>[ 192.473984] usb 2-2: New USB device found, idVendor=0e8d, idProduct=7610
>[ 192.473989] usb 2-2: New USB device strings: Mfr=1, Product=2,
>SerialNumber=3
>[ 192.473993] usb 2-2: Product: WiFi
>[ 192.473996] usb 2-2: Manufacturer: Me
] usb 2-2: New USB device strings: Mfr=1, Product=2,
SerialNumber=3
[ 192.473993] usb 2-2: Product: WiFi
[ 192.473996] usb 2-2: Manufacturer: MediaTek
[ 192.473999] usb 2-2: SerialNumber: 1.0
And since the file
drivers/net/wireless/rt2x00/Kconfig
has the following config line:
config
On 05/17/2015 01:08 AM, poma wrote:
On 17.05.2015 05:00, jd1008 wrote:
On 05/14/2015 09:04 AM, poma wrote:
On 14.05.2015 05:09, jd1008 wrote:
I am considering buying such a plug.
It is described as:
Mini AC600 High Performance 2.4GHz 5GHz Dual Band WiFi Wireless USB Adapter
Features:
100
On 17.05.2015 05:00, jd1008 wrote:
>
> On 05/14/2015 09:04 AM, poma wrote:
>> On 14.05.2015 05:09, jd1008 wrote:
>>> I am considering buying such a plug.
>>> It is described as:
>>> Mini AC600 High Performance 2.4GHz 5GHz Dual Band WiFi Wireless USB Adapt
On 05/14/2015 09:04 AM, poma wrote:
On 14.05.2015 05:09, jd1008 wrote:
I am considering buying such a plug.
It is described as:
Mini AC600 High Performance 2.4GHz 5GHz Dual Band WiFi Wireless USB Adapter
Features:
100% Brand New and High Quality
This AC600 dual band adapter delivers powerful
On 14.05.2015 05:09, jd1008 wrote:
> I am considering buying such a plug.
> It is described as:
> Mini AC600 High Performance 2.4GHz 5GHz Dual Band WiFi Wireless USB Adapter
> Features:
> 100% Brand New and High Quality
> This AC600 dual band adapter delivers powerful wireles
escribed as:
>Mini AC600 High Performance 2.4GHz 5GHz Dual Band WiFi Wireless USB Adapter
>Features:
>100% Brand New and High Quality
>This AC600 dual band adapter delivers powerful wireless AC technology to your
>desktop or notebook computer.
>Simply plug the adapter into an availa
On 14.05.2015, Erik P. Olsen wrote:
> The OP hasn't bought it yet :)
Hell, you're right! Sorry :-)
--
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users
Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproj
On 2015-05-14 at 08:07:43 Heinz Diehl wrote:
> On 14.05.2015, jd1008 wrote:
>
> > Mini AC600 High Performance 2.4GHz 5GHz Dual Band WiFi Wireless USB
> > Adapter
>
> Can you please post the output of "lsusb -v" for this adapter?
>
The OP hasn't b
On 14.05.2015, jd1008 wrote:
> Mini AC600 High Performance 2.4GHz 5GHz Dual Band WiFi Wireless USB Adapter
Can you please post the output of "lsusb -v" for this adapter?
--
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe or change subscription o
I am considering buying such a plug.
It is described as:
Mini AC600 High Performance 2.4GHz 5GHz Dual Band WiFi Wireless USB Adapter
Features:
100% Brand New and High Quality
This AC600 dual band adapter delivers powerful wireless AC technology to your
desktop or notebook computer.
Simply plug
On 05/12/2015 04:52 AM, Timothy Murphy wrote:
<<>>
> I tried all the mechanisms suggested in the manual, and none worked.
> If I were writing the manual, I would say on page 1,
> "The first step has to be to access the device web-page.
> If you aren't able to do this you cannot set up the repeat
Doug:
>> You should be able to access the device over the network in wifi mode
>> simply by entering the ip address in the address line of your router.
>
Timothy Murphy:
> I get the web-page of my router when I do that.
Depending on how your wireless extender works, it cou
Doug wrote:
>> In any case, I managed to see the device's web-page briefly,
>> by switching off WiFi on my laptop, connecting the device
>> to the laptop by ethernet, and changing the laptop's ethernet address
>> to 192.168.10.5 .
>> Now I could see t
Tim wrote:
>> The manual says the device has IP address 192.168.10.1,
>> but as far as I can see you have to have a machine
>> running 192.168.10.something to see the device's web-page?
>> I know 192.168.10.* is an allowed address,
>> but is it so popular that one can assume it is in use?
> Withi
On 05/11/2015 07:33 AM, Timothy Murphy wrote:
/snip/
But I haven't actually solved my problem.
/snip/
I've continued to try to get my SilverCrest WiFi extender working
(model SWR 300 a1, from Lidl).
(Actually, I've asked in a few places about this,
and never heard from an
de, you have to go through
the gateway).
So, if you want to talk to something at 192.168.10.1, you'll either need
to be in the same 192.168.10.x subnet, or you'd need to change the
netmasks on both devices to 255.255.0.0.
> I managed to see the device's web-page briefly, by s
g wrote:
>> Actually, I already did that - I got two much longer arms from
>> Amazon, which had a considerable effect.
>
> glad to have seen you cured problem.
> while re-indexing my firefox bookmarks, i ran across an interesting
> some interesting bookmarks tagged '
quot;. ;-)
while re-indexing my firefox bookmarks, i ran across an interesting
some interesting bookmarks tagged 'wifi antennas' that was still
under 'Unsorted'.
http://freeantennas.com/
you, or others, might have a look if you ever need a "quickie"
solution.
-
On 04/29/2015 11:01 AM, Tim wrote:
> Tim:
>>> This blessing is cursed... ;-)
>>>
>>> I wonder if all off-the-shelf WiFi antennas are omnidirectional.
>>> I've never actually needed to change my antenna.
>
> g:
>> not even.
>>
&
Tim:
>> This blessing is cursed... ;-)
>>
>> I wonder if all off-the-shelf WiFi antennas are omnidirectional.
>> I've never actually needed to change my antenna.
g:
> not even.
>
> types include all sorts of; array beam, biconical, butterfly,
> ca
> g:
>> all of which can be decreased with a parabolic reflector for each
>> antenna.
>
>>> You can also get signal overload causing strange things.
>>
>> which a parabolic reflector might cause. ;-)
>
> This blessing is cursed... ;-)
>
> I wo
ote:
Timothy Murphy wrote:
One room in my house is at the boundary of WiFi reception,
and WiFi occasionally fails there.
When this happens it is nearly always restored by re-booting.
Re-starting NetworkManager never does the trick, however.
Is there any other step I could take, short of re-booting?
I
flector for each
> antenna.
>> You can also get signal overload causing strange things.
>
> which a parabolic reflector might cause. ;-)
This blessing is cursed... ;-)
I wonder if all off-the-shelf WiFi antennas are omnidirectional. I've
never actually needed to change m
On 04/29/2015 12:33 AM, Tim wrote:
> On Tue, 2015-04-28 at 10:01 +0200, j.witvl...@mindef.nl wrote:
>> With only ten feet away, drop of signal because of distance isn't a
>> serious consideration.
>
> With close distances, it's usually signal reflections, that mess up a
> signal, rather than sign
On Tue, 2015-04-28 at 10:01 +0200, j.witvl...@mindef.nl wrote:
> With only ten feet away, drop of signal because of distance isn't a
> serious consideration.
With close distances, it's usually signal reflections, that mess up a
signal, rather than signal losses. The reflections can add together i
erlap.
Hw
-Original Message-
From: users-boun...@lists.fedoraproject.org
[mailto:users-boun...@lists.fedoraproject.org] On Behalf Of Tim
Sent: dinsdag 28 april 2015 8:53
To: users@lists.fedoraproject.org
Subject: Re: WiFi restoration
Timothy Murphy wrote:
>> One room in my hous
Timothy Murphy wrote:
>> One room in my house is at the boundary of WiFi reception,
>> and WiFi occasionally fails there.
>> When this happens it is nearly always restored by re-booting.
>> Re-starting NetworkManager never does the trick, however.
>> Is there any oth
On 04/23/2015 06:29 AM, Timothy Murphy wrote:
One room in my house is at the boundary of WiFi reception,
and WiFi occasionally fails there.
When this happens it is nearly always restored by re-booting.
Re-starting NetworkManager never does the trick, however.
Is there any other step I could take
Hmm, one possible place to look at is the changelog on the later
kernel packages as they may include clues about wifi module updates
and related software stack.
B.R.
--
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org
the poor connection that
>> eventually cause a failure. Increasing the signal by moving the wifi
>> access point as suggested may help mask that. One other thing you can
>> do is do a modprobe -r on the kernel module for your device and then a
>> modprobe to load it again. If it'
al by moving the wifi
> access point as suggested may help mask that. One other thing you can
> do is do a modprobe -r on the kernel module for your device and then a
> modprobe to load it again. If it's a problem in the driver triggered
> by connection errors then that may clear it
but I am running F21/KDE.
>
> I am using "kde-plasma-nm". When I left-click on the Network-Icon in the
> systray a dialog is exposed. At the very top are 2 check-boxes. The left
> most check box is for turning the WiFi on. I have a desk top with wifi
> and wired. To
Allegedly, on or about 25 April 2015, Timothy Murphy sent:
> When I google for "fedora airplane mode" I get lots of hits
> but none of the ones I've looked at actually explain
> what they mean by this term.
Did you mean defining what Fedora does about it, or what "airplane mode"
refers to?
Airpl
ng F21/KDE.
I am using "kde-plasma-nm". When I left-click on the Network-Icon in the
systray a dialog is exposed. At the very top are 2 check-boxes. The left most check box
is for turning the WiFi on. I have a desk top with wifi and wired. To the right of the
WiFi is another b
On 04/25/2015 05:08 PM, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote:
On Sat, 2015-04-25 at 10:22 +0200, j.witvl...@mindef.nl wrote:
Powerline adapters are illegal in several countries as they pollute
the radio spectrum.
I wasn't aware of that. They are not illegal where I live (UK).
I would not want to exclud
On Sat, 2015-04-25 at 10:22 +0200, j.witvl...@mindef.nl wrote:
> Powerline adapters are illegal in several countries as they pollute
> the radio spectrum.
I wasn't aware of that. They are not illegal where I live (UK).
> Only good solution is cat6 or fibre and a second accesspoint.
Certainly the
-plasma-nm". When I left-click on the Network-Icon in the
systray a dialog is exposed. At the very top are 2 check-boxes. The left most
check box is for turning the WiFi on. I have a desk top with wifi and wired.
To the right of the WiFi is another box with a little airplane. This
lenovo carbon x1
It seems recently, every time my laptop wakes, it immediately connects to
wifi. But shortly afterwards, the wifi isn't working (can't ping anything).
Then I disconnect and reconnect, and it's fine. This happens very
repeatably.
Not quite sure if it actua
Hard blocked: no
On my old Sony laptop there was a slider switch which would toggle
that 'Hard blocked' status. An interesting effect (that I discovered
when the switch became unreliable and I had to use a USB dongle) was
the Hard blocked setting would stop both attached cards run
inkpads have this -
but I haven't seen it referred to as "airplane mode" anywhere.
I'm not sure if "rfkill block wifi" has exactly the same effect
as this switch.
(I had to use "rfkill unblock" while trying to get KDE Connect working,
but that is another stor
hat may be in the
>> way
>>> of the wireless signal path.
>>
>> I did get a longer antenna for the Linksys WRT54GL WiFi router.
>> I also tried to set up a WiFi repeater (SilverCrest SWR 300 a1)
>> but could not get it working under Fedora or Windows.
>> I
On 04/25/2015 01:35 AM, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote:
On Sat, 2015-04-25 at 00:51 +0200, Timothy Murphy wrote:
I did get a longer antenna for the Linksys WRT54GL WiFi router.
I also tried to set up a WiFi repeater (SilverCrest SWR 300 a1)
but could not get it working under Fedora or Windo
On Sat, 2015-04-25 at 01:22 +0200, Timothy Murphy wrote:
> Airplane mode? Is there such a thing on a laptop?
I would have thought so, people do use laptops when they travel.
I kind-of wouldn't expect it on a desktop, though, but the function may
be in all the wireless software.
--
tim@localho
On Sat, 2015-04-25 at 00:35 +0100, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote:
> I tried a wireless repeater a few years ago. Complete waste of money,
> despite being a reputable brand (Linksys).
Interesting to know. Never actually used one, just know of their
existence. I can well imagine problems if there isn'
Matthew Miller wrote:
>> However, I didn't know computers (other than phones) had an Airplane
>> mode. Another thing that could be tried would be to rmmod the wifi driver
> They usually do -- look at
>
> https://www.kernel.org/doc/Documentation/rfkill.txt
>
>
y be in the
> way
> > of the wireless signal path.
>
> I did get a longer antenna for the Linksys WRT54GL WiFi router.
> I also tried to set up a WiFi repeater (SilverCrest SWR 300 a1)
> but could not get it working under Fedora or Windows.
> I have thought of using a
Jim Lewis wrote:
>>> One room in my house is at the boundary of WiFi reception,
>>> and WiFi occasionally fails there.
>>> When this happens it is nearly always restored by re-booting.
>>> Re-starting NetworkManager never does the trick, however.
>>> I
Dan Mossor wrote:
>> One room in my house is at the boundary of WiFi reception,
>> and WiFi occasionally fails there.
>> When this happens it is nearly always restored by re-booting.
>> Re-starting NetworkManager never does the trick, however.
>> Is there any other
Doug wrote:
> Another "fix"--obtain a longer antenna made for the frequency band,
> which is surely 2400~2480 MHz. Make sure the connector mates with the
> connector on the router!
> This may work, since you _almost_ have enough signal now, and another dB
> or two may make all the difference.
Act
Tim wrote:
>> One room in my house is at the boundary of WiFi reception,
>> and WiFi occasionally fails there.
>> When this happens it is nearly always restored by re-booting.
>> Re-starting NetworkManager never does the trick, however.
>> Is there any other step I c
On 04/24/2015 07:14 AM, Tim wrote:
On Thu, 2015-04-23 at 18:44 -0400, Tom Horsley wrote:
I do something similar that works great to boost the signal
across the length of the house, but I cut off a square of
aluminum flashing I had instead of opening up a beer can :-).
You hadn't finished drin
On Thu, 2015-04-23 at 18:44 -0400, Tom Horsley wrote:
> I do something similar that works great to boost the signal
> across the length of the house, but I cut off a square of
> aluminum flashing I had instead of opening up a beer can :-).
You hadn't finished drinking it yet? ;-)
--
tim@localho
On 04/23/2015 03:44 PM, Tom Horsley wrote:
On Thu, 23 Apr 2015 18:36:16 -0400
Doug wrote:
WiFi is radio frequency signals. What you need to do is take steps to
make the signals stronger in that area.
http://www.wikihow.com/Make-a-Wi-Fi-Booster-Using-Only-a-Can
(I do something similar that
On Thu, 23 Apr 2015 18:36:16 -0400
Doug wrote:
> WiFi is radio frequency signals. What you need to do is take steps to
> make the signals stronger in that area.
http://www.wikihow.com/Make-a-Wi-Fi-Booster-Using-Only-a-Can
(I do something similar that works great to boost the signal
acro
On 04/23/2015 06:29 AM, Timothy Murphy wrote:
One room in my house is at the boundary of WiFi reception,
and WiFi occasionally fails there.
When this happens it is nearly always restored by re-booting.
Re-starting NetworkManager never does the trick, however.
Is there any other step I could
On Thu, Apr 23, 2015 at 10:23:53AM -1000, Jim Lewis wrote:
> However, I didn't know computers (other than phones) had an Airplane
> mode. Another thing that could be tried would be to rmmod the wifi driver
They usually do -- look at
https://www.kernel.org/doc/Documentation/rfkill.
> On 04/23/2015 05:29 AM, Timothy Murphy wrote:
>> One room in my house is at the boundary of WiFi reception,
>> and WiFi occasionally fails there.
>> When this happens it is nearly always restored by re-booting.
>> Re-starting NetworkManager never does the trick, how
On 04/23/2015 05:29 AM, Timothy Murphy wrote:
One room in my house is at the boundary of WiFi reception,
and WiFi occasionally fails there.
When this happens it is nearly always restored by re-booting.
Re-starting NetworkManager never does the trick, however.
Is there any other step I could take
20:47:10 Tim wrote:
>
> > On Thu, 2015-04-23 at 12:29 +0200, Timothy Murphy wrote:
> > > One room in my house is at the boundary of WiFi reception,
> > > and WiFi occasionally fails there.
> > > When this happens it is nearly always restored by re-booting.
> >
On 2015-04-23 at 20:47:10 Tim wrote:
> On Thu, 2015-04-23 at 12:29 +0200, Timothy Murphy wrote:
> > One room in my house is at the boundary of WiFi reception,
> > and WiFi occasionally fails there.
> > When this happens it is nearly always restored by re-booting.
> >
On Thu, 2015-04-23 at 12:29 +0200, Timothy Murphy wrote:
> One room in my house is at the boundary of WiFi reception,
> and WiFi occasionally fails there.
> When this happens it is nearly always restored by re-booting.
> Re-starting NetworkManager never does the trick, however.
&g
One room in my house is at the boundary of WiFi reception,
and WiFi occasionally fails there.
When this happens it is nearly always restored by re-booting.
Re-starting NetworkManager never does the trick, however.
Is there any other step I could take, short of re-booting?
I'm running Fedora-2
I should check to see if there are any bug filings. I don't knwo what
to test, and I am supprised I am the only one having the problems...
Today I applied the latest updates. I powered off. Powered up. WiFi
was working. Went into suspend and off to a meeting. Got to the
meeting and
On 02/11/2015 09:54 AM, poma wrote:
On 11.02.2015 16:26, Robert Moskowitz wrote:
Well it is not the rtl built-in WiFi.
I just plugged in a TP-Link TL-WN722N USB WiFi adapter. It behaves the
same as not being able to connect to any visible SSIDs.
So it is something more fundimental in the
On 11.02.2015 16:26, Robert Moskowitz wrote:
> Well it is not the rtl built-in WiFi.
>
> I just plugged in a TP-Link TL-WN722N USB WiFi adapter. It behaves the
> same as not being able to connect to any visible SSIDs.
>
> So it is something more fundimental in the WiFi co
On 02/06/2015 12:39 AM, poma wrote:
What do you say, Mister Moskowitz, would it be helpful to provide to us info as to
whether "rtl8192ce-reload.service" helps in your case.
Well it is not the rtl built-in WiFi.
I just plugged in a TP-Link TL-WN722N USB WiFi adapter. It behaves
On 10.02.2015 02:08, poma wrote:
> On 09.02.2015 21:28, Stephen Morris wrote:
>>
>> On 02/04/2015 11:10 AM, poma wrote:
>>> Any throughput measurement, any at all? :)
>>>
>>>
>> I haven't been able to get any measurements as yet, I'm having trouble
>> synchronizing times with my son to use his Arc
On 02/10/2015 07:40 AM, Joe Zeff wrote:
On 02/09/2015 12:28 PM, Stephen Morris wrote:
One thing I have noticed is that since switching to this
modem/router/adapter combination my internet download speeds have
decreased significantly under both Linux and Windows, plus I can't play
games under Win
On 09.02.2015 21:28, Stephen Morris wrote:
>
> On 02/04/2015 11:10 AM, poma wrote:
>> Any throughput measurement, any at all? :)
>>
>>
> I haven't been able to get any measurements as yet, I'm having trouble
> synchronizing times with my son to use his Arch linux system to do the
> measurements.
On 02/09/2015 12:28 PM, Stephen Morris wrote:
One thing I have noticed is that since switching to this
modem/router/adapter combination my internet download speeds have
decreased significantly under both Linux and Windows, plus I can't play
games under Windows using the ac 5GHz interface, I have
On 02/04/2015 11:10 AM, poma wrote:
Any throughput measurement, any at all? :)
I haven't been able to get any measurements as yet, I'm having trouble
synchronizing times with my son to use his Arch linux system to do the
measurements.
One thing I have noticed is that since switching to this
On 02/06/2015 09:15 AM, Robert Moskowitz wrote:
On 02/06/2015 12:39 AM, poma wrote:
What do you say, Mister Moskowitz, would it be helpful to provide to
us info as to whether "rtl8192ce-reload.service" helps in your case.
Funny you should ask
Last night my wifi stopped worki
On 02/06/2015 12:39 AM, poma wrote:
What do you say, Mister Moskowitz, would it be helpful to provide to us info as to
whether "rtl8192ce-reload.service" helps in your case.
Funny you should ask
Last night my wifi stopped working, and in the rush of the evening, I
just plug
What do you say, Mister Moskowitz, would it be helpful to provide to us info as
to whether "rtl8192ce-reload.service" helps in your case.
poma
--
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/us
Any throughput measurement, any at all? :)
--
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users
Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.
ice.
>>>> Created symlink from
>>>> /etc/systemd/system/suspend.target.wants/rtl8192ce-reload.service to
>>>> /etc/systemd/system/rtl8192ce-reload.service.
>>>> Created symlink from
>>>> /etc/systemd/system/hybrid-sleep.target.wants/rtl
arding the current status in this matter?
>
> As people continuously ask me about this, I'll just try to answer it
> on the public ML:
>
> To make Miracast work, we need access to a Wifi P2P API. The kernel
> implements Wifi P2P and wpa_supplicant provides access to it via it
On 02.02.2015 21:59, Stephen Morris wrote:
> On 02/02/2015 08:57 AM, poma wrote:
>> On 01.02.2015 21:19, Stephen Morris wrote:
>>> On 01/30/2015 10:26 AM, poma wrote:
On 29.01.2015 23:00, Stephen Morris wrote:
> On 01/30/2015 08:34 AM, Stephen Morris wrote:
>> On 01/30/2015 06:47 AM, p
On 02/02/2015 08:57 AM, poma wrote:
On 01.02.2015 21:19, Stephen Morris wrote:
On 01/30/2015 10:26 AM, poma wrote:
On 29.01.2015 23:00, Stephen Morris wrote:
On 01/30/2015 08:34 AM, Stephen Morris wrote:
On 01/30/2015 06:47 AM, poma wrote:
On 29.01.2015 20:25, poma wrote:
...
Try this
$ gi
m/suspend.target.wants/rtl8192ce-reload.service to
>>> /etc/systemd/system/rtl8192ce-reload.service.
>>> Created symlink from
>>> /etc/systemd/system/hybrid-sleep.target.wants/rtl8192ce-reload.service
>>> to /etc/systemd/system/rtl8192ce-reload.service.
>>&
On 02.02.2015 20:52, Stephen Morris wrote:
> I issued this command which didn't display much, but the output is
> below. The first line is very interesting.
>
> Couldn't open device, some information will be missing
>bcdUSB 2.10
>bcdDevice0.00
>
USB3 device sh
/etc/systemd/system/rtl8192ce-reload.service.
Then tried connecting to WiFi SSID, and did not work. Is enable
enough? Do I also start the service? Seem to recall that they are
separate functions?
Not you, but systemd will pull/start rtl8192ce-reload.service as part of system
S3 RESUME
On 02/02/2015 10:07 AM, poma wrote:
On 01.02.2015 22:57, poma wrote:
On 01.02.2015 21:19, Stephen Morris wrote:
On 01/30/2015 10:26 AM, poma wrote:
On 29.01.2015 23:00, Stephen Morris wrote:
On 01/30/2015 08:34 AM, Stephen Morris wrote:
On 01/30/2015 06:47 AM, poma wrote:
On 29.01.2015 20:2
leep.target.wants/rtl8192ce-reload.service
> to /etc/systemd/system/rtl8192ce-reload.service.
>
> Then tried connecting to WiFi SSID, and did not work. Is enable
> enough? Do I also start the service? Seem to recall that they are
> separate functions?
>
Not you, but syst
WiFi SSID, and did not work. Is enable
enough? Do I also start the service? Seem to recall that they are
separate functions?
Afterwards test with:
a) # systemctl suspend
b) # systemctl hibernate
c) # systemctl hybrid-sleep
Only suspend is safe on this system.
Or at least my testing of the
And do not forget to
# systemctl enable rtl8192ce-reload.service
Afterwards test with:
a) # systemctl suspend
b) # systemctl hibernate
c) # systemctl hybrid-sleep
--
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/
>>>>> (wlp4s0): supplicant interface state: disconnected -> inactive
>>>>>
>>>>> Any idea where to troubleshoot this one?
>>>>>
>>>>> It won't connect to my smartphone MiFi either. Tried that. And at
>>>
connect to my smartphone MiFi either. Tried that. And at
first my SSID disappeared from the list of found SSIDs. I checked from
my phone which had no problem connecting to my local WiFi, so it is the
F21 system. After restarting NetworkManager, my SSID again appeared in
the list.
Wha
701 - 800 of 1364 matches
Mail list logo
