On Mon, Jan 16, 2017 at 12:40 PM, Jonathan Yu wrote:
> What about git-annex? https://apps.fedoraproject.org/packages/git-annex
>
Unfortunately, we don't manage what our clients are using. LFS is now
supported directly in Github, Gitlab, and Bitbucket (and probably others),
which makes the best c
What about git-annex? https://apps.fedoraproject.org/packages/git-annex
They serve similar purposes, and it might be quicker/easier to add
git-annex support given that there's already a package for Fedora.
They seem to solve similar use cases, though I haven't used either myself -
here's a compar
We would probably need help getting git-lfs packaged first. That's really
the biggest blocker to enabling it by default.
On Jan 16, 2017, at 9:40 AM, Philippe Lafoucrière <
philippe.lafoucri...@tech-angels.com> wrote:
@Clayton, does it sound reasonable to you to ask for LFS support in s2i?
If ye
@Clayton, does it sound reasonable to you to ask for LFS support in s2i?
If yes, where should this ticket go?
https://github.com/openshift/source-to-image ?
Thanks
___
users mailing list
users@lists.openshift.redhat.com
http://lists.openshift.redhat.c
