Is there a way to mark an artifact such that the install and deploy
are skipped? In my case, there really is no need to have WAR files in
my local or public repositories.
Sean
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For add
> How about this:
> scm:svn:svn://host/PROJECT/${pom.artifactId}
>
> This should work if you use the same name for the part in your svn
> repository as their artifactIds.
This works. Unfortunately in our case the svn module does not match
the artifactId. It would be nice if they could deviate an
> I'm trying to publish our project's nightly builds using
> assembly:assembly publish.
Actually I'm using assembly:assembly deploy
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
I'm trying to publish our project's nightly builds using
assembly:assembly publish. The resulting tarballs are published but
so are the poms and meta-data.xml. Ideally this would not be
published as the end user does not care about such things. They just
want to download the tarball.
Also, if p
Laugstøl a écrit :
> > On Fri, 2006-01-13 at 09:14 -0500, Sean Schofield wrote:
> >
> >>We're trying to setup continuum for the MyFaces project. We have a
> >>solaris zone set up and we're having trouble starting the server.
> >>
> >>$ b
Lee,
Disregard my email. ;-) I thought the message was to myfaces-users.
The two folders are next to each other in gmail. Sorry for the
confusion.
Sean
On 1/6/06, Sean Schofield <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Lee,
>
> We're going to be moving the Maven stuff around tomorr
Lee,
We're going to be moving the Maven stuff around tomorrow. Over the
next few days we should be settling on the final layout. Some of the
unit tests do not work (as you discovered) but should be excluded from
the build (for the moment.)
Hopefully we'll get everything sorted out with lots of
John,
Thanks for the link. That is what I was looking for. I don't know
why I couldn't find it on my own but I was having trouble ;-)
Sean
On 1/2/06, John Fallows <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Sean,
>
> On 1/2/06, Sean Schofield <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> &g
Actually when I did a clean install I discovered that having both
scopes listed does not work. Its unable to compile. When I comment
out the test scope entry it compiles but I'm getting runtime errors
which I believe are coming from the fact that the unit tests can't
find the class.
Sean
On 1/2
I'm having trouble determining the scope choices for a dependency
entry. Right now I have something like:
commons-codec
commons-codec
1.3
compile
commons-codec
commons-codec
10 matches
Mail list logo