Hi,
I'm having trouble with the scm:checkout goal (M1.1, using the 1.6.1 scm
plugin, Windows XP)
From what I can see my scm url is fine
(scm:cvs:pserver:jshute:[EMAIL PROTECTED]:/home/source:MyModule), but when
it does the checkout it's refusing to use the password I've supplied in
the URL. Inst
anyone
had something more they wanted to add before a release. I'm planning to
release 2.1 within the next couple of weeks.
Shute, James wrote:
> Apologies if this question is answered in an FAQ somewhere but I can't
> for the life of me find it...
>
> Where should I look t
Apologies if this question is answered in an FAQ somewhere but I can't
for the life of me find it...
Where should I look to see what the release schedule is for M2 plugins
etc?
I'm particularly interested in getting the 2.1 version of the Idea
plugin as it'll have issue MIDEA-62 fixed. Given I
.1 version of that plugin is released.
thanks
-Original Message-
From: Jerome Lacoste [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, April 17, 2007 5:04 PM
To: Maven Users List
Subject: Re: M2 : Controlling WEB-INF/lib contents in war
On 4/17/07, Shute, James <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote
war
2007/4/17, Shute, James <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> An alternative approach I've tried is in the pom for the war to
> specify the dependencies again, but with a scope of provided, which
> does stop them being bundled in. However this is a bit of a hack as
> if I change the
I'm having a go at migrating my app to M2 and have hit a bit of a
roadblock. For my war module I don't want the dependencies to go into
WEB-INF/lib, with the exception of 2 of them, which do have to live in
there (for reasons to do with Weblogic's class-loading)
Now under M1 this was easy - just
The target layout I'm after is:
ear
|
|-lib
| |-a.jar
| |-b.jar
|
|-webapp
|
|-WEB-INF
|-web.xml
|-lib
|-c.jar
I can't use warSourceExcludes as AFAIK excludes take precedence over
includes, so I can't exclude *.jar but then include c.jar
For it to work us
Hi,
I've got an M1 project which uses xmlbeans, which I'm looking to convert
over to M2.
Now I've done this for the command line build using the standard
XmlBeans plugin and that all works nicely.
The point where I have a problem is then doing development work in an
IDE (preferably Idea, though
Just noticed a weird little issue whilst doing a release with the latest
1.1-RC1 snapshot.
If I do "maven scm:perform-release", and have maven.scm.url set to
scm:cvs:pserver:anon:@cvshost:/home/source:MyModule then it works
absolutely fine, but the scm:parse-connection goal produces some very
misl
ote about plugin dependencies in projects.
>
> Nobody else is interested by maven 1.1 ?
>
> Should we continue to try to release a final version 1.1 ?
> Everybody moved to maven 2 or your existing maven 1.x satisfy you ?
>
> Arnaud
>
> On 10/10/06, Shute, James <[EMAIL
Sent: Wednesday, October 11, 2006 2:17 PM
To: users@maven.apache.org
Subject: Re: Machine specific settings
Add in ~/.m2/settings.xml
a that defaults activates and has a
... idea with
1.4
Or create a profiles.xml file in your project dir, which does the same
thing.
See the free m2 book.
Shute,
I'm having a go at moving from Maven 1.x up to 2.0 and can't quite work
out the correct way to model local machine specific settings. I've
looked through the docs and mailing lists so have found various details
about profiles but I can't quite see how to use them to cater for
certain setup issues.
ce? Try to remove the .maven/cache/maven-scm-plugin-1.5/ directory
and see what happens..
-Lukas
Shute, James wrote:
> Arnaud,
>
> I've succesfully been using 1.1b2 for a while so thought I'd give this
> a spin. I'm having trouble with the scm:prepare-release goal. I&#
Arnaud,
I've succesfully been using 1.1b2 for a while so thought I'd give this a
spin. I'm having trouble with the scm:prepare-release goal. I've
included the output when running with -X below.
I'm no expert but it looks a bit suspicious that the version of
maven-scm-plugin mentioned in the 2nd
I've been on 1.0.2 for a while and so thought I'd move on up to one of
the 1.1 rcs. I'm having trouble with rc3 though - when I do certain scm
operations it fails.
e.g. scm:update
scm:update:
[echo] Updating from SCM
BUILD FAILED
File.. file:/C:/Temp/.maven/cache/maven-scm-plugin-1.5/pl
be ok.
Emmanuel
Shute, James a écrit :
> Not sure you understood my point - our CVS repo is managed and administered
> by a separate team using servers we have no access to (other than via
> standard CVS access). Hence any sort of hook based approach is no use to me
> - regardless of
continuum-users@maven.apache.org
Subject: Re: build after every checkin
We can't add a hook in your scm. It's generally a script that you add in a
directory of your scm.
We can't create the full xml-rpc because it depends on how you want to use it,
but we provide a helper class that will help
Are there any plans to add support for this though? Those of us using
Continuum in corporate environments may well not be able to add hooks into the
scm system so it would certainly be a great plus point for me.
James
-Original Message-
From: Emmanuel Venisse [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hi,
I've got a Maven1 project building under Continuum, but now have some
unit tests that need to connect to a database.
When I just run the tests on my box via Maven then I leave the username
/ password blank so it uses the integrated security and picks up the
username / password of the current
Hi,
I've got 2 projects (both Maven 1.x) where project A depends on project
B. Now at the moment I've got them both building in Continuum
independently which is ok, but what I'd really like is that when
building A it uses the latest build of B done by Continuum. Ideally a
change to B would also
I use this setup which works for me (Idea 5.1 / Maven 1.0.2) and looks
like it covers what you want:
Put the appropriate log4j.properties file in:
1. main/resources
2. test/resources
3. test/java
(plus the relevant resource location definition in the pom for 1 & 2)
So for me 3 always gets preced
Hi,
I'm using 1.0.3 and am having a problem with one of my (Maven 1)
projects. Every time the build runs it adds copies of the configured
Mail Notifiers, so I get an ever expanding number of emails. It looks
like it's doubling each time.
Other projects are building ok. The main difference with
Are there any plans to turn Maven 1.1b2 into 1.1 final?
I'm personally quite happy to trust using a b2 version but being in a
commercial organisation eyebrows are always raised when you say you're
using a beta build of an open source project!
thanks
James
---
Does anybody know how I can compare 2 properties in a custom goal in my
maven.xml file?
e.g.
For a build where the properties are
java.specification.version : 1.5
maven.compile.target : 1.4
Then these steps
${java.specification.version ne maven.compile.target}
${java.specification.
Hi,
Just started using Continuum and am really liking it, but have just 1
small issue I can't seem to find an answer to.
One of our projects, which is built using Maven 1, needs a machine
specific property set (it's an absolute path to a specific file), so
that goes in build.properties in the pro
/introduction-to-dependency-mechanism.html
Emmanuel
Shute, James a écrit :
> Hi,
>
> I'm experimenting with moving over to Maven 2 from 1.0.2 and have
> drawn a blank on what the M2 way to do local jar overrides is.
>
> The reason I particularly need to do this is we use
Hi,
I'm experimenting with moving over to Maven 2 from 1.0.2 and have drawn
a blank on what the M2 way to do local jar overrides is.
The reason I particularly need to do this is we use a 3rd party library
that's basically just a thin layer on top of some native (windows)
libraries. For compilati
27 matches
Mail list logo
