Implement both, after 30 or 60 days, decide which one you like best
and drop the other. ;-)
Wayne
On 5/4/06, Eric Pugh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I think a lot of it just comes down to personal preference. If your
decision isn't driven by a specific feature/missing feature of one or
the other,
I think a lot of it just comes down to personal preference. If your
decision isn't driven by a specific feature/missing feature of one or
the other, then go with the one you are more comfortable with! Often
having expertise in one or the other is a better reason to pick it.
After all, it
> clean site:deploy deploy). I have never used cruise control
> but I heard it's hard to configure.
I have not found CruiseControl difficult to configure. It's not more
difficult than Maven is, and adding more projects to the configuration is
mostly copy-paste. CC also comes with a nice web-base
ts
M2.
--
Daniel Siegmann
FJA-US, Inc.
(212) 840-2618 ext. 139
> -Original Message-
> From: Sebastien Arbogast [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Wednesday, May 03, 2006 7:28 PM
> To: Maven users list
> Subject: [m2] Continuum or CruiseControl as a CI server ?
>
>
>
I 've used both continuum and cruisecontrol, IMHO continuum is a lot
better and easier, especially for maven 2 multiprojects.
Sebastien Arbogast wrote:
I'm trying to find the best CI tool for a brand new Maven2-built project
and
I'd like to have your experience feedback about which one to choo
On 5/4/06, Eric Pugh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I used to be a big advocate of CC. I've had a contribution committed
to the main code base in almost everyone of the last couple point
releases. My big beef with CC breaks down to two things:
1) Speed
2) Web interface
I find that with long build
I used to be a big advocate of CC. I've had a contribution committed
to the main code base in almost everyone of the last couple point
releases. My big beef with CC breaks down to two things:
1) Speed
2) Web interface
I find that with long builds that output a lot of data, the CC method
On 5/4/06, Kaare Nilsen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Well.. i use it myself :)
But yes there are several limitations in multi-module projects and
cruise control in general. As of now we do not have any clever
solutions for making sure that when one module changes, then the
modules that depends on i
t; > > builds,
> > > > single projects, profiled builds, nightly builds running all
> > reports, on
> > > > demand builds and so on and so I've no reason to migrate.
> > > >
> > > > A couple of links:
> > > &
ghtly builds running all
> reports, on
> > > demand builds and so on and so I've no reason to migrate.
> > >
> > > A couple of links:
> > >
> > > http://cruisecontrol.sourceforge.net/main/configxml.html
> > > http://jira.public.thoughtworks.org
/configxml.html
> > > http://jira.public.thoughtworks.org/browse/CC-363
> > > http://confluence.public.thoughtworks.org/display/CC/Home
> > >
> > >
> > > - Original Message -
> > > From: "Alexandre Poitras" <[EMAIL
d so I've no reason to migrate.
> >
> > A couple of links:
> >
> > http://cruisecontrol.sourceforge.net/main/configxml.html
> > http://jira.public.thoughtworks.org/browse/CC-363
> > http://confluence.public.thoughtworks.org/display/CC/Home
> >
> >
> > - Orig
t;[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: "Maven Users List"
> Sent: Thursday, May 04, 2006 3:52 AM
> Subject: Re: [m2] Continuum or CruiseControl as a CI server ?
>
>
> Well Continuum does the job for me, never thought about switching.
> What I like about continuum is that you
Thursday, May 04, 2006 3:52 AM
Subject: Re: [m2] Continuum or CruiseControl as a CI server ?
Well Continuum does the job for me, never thought about switching.
What I like about continuum is that you can customize the goals
invoked during a build (for instance, clean site:deploy deploy). I
hav
e.net/main/configxml.html
http://jira.public.thoughtworks.org/browse/CC-363
http://confluence.public.thoughtworks.org/display/CC/Home
- Original Message -
From: "Alexandre Poitras" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Maven Users List"
Sent: Thursday, May 04, 2006 3:52 AM
Sub
Well Continuum does the job for me, never thought about switching.
What I like about continuum is that you can customize the goals
invoked during a build (for instance, clean site:deploy deploy). I
have never used cruise control but I heard it's hard to configure.
On 5/3/06, Sebastien Arbogast <
I'm trying to find the best CI tool for a brand new Maven2-built project and
I'd like to have your experience feedback about which one to choose between
Continuum and CruiseControl.
I know that, as Continuum is a spin-off of Maven project it should be better
integrated with it. But on the other ha
17 matches
Mail list logo
