-users@maven.apache.org
Subject: Re: Why Continuum?
On 22.02.2006, at 08:34, Johnson, Jonathan wrote:
> For instance Continuum does not have the feature yet to invoke
> builds based on SCM changes.
Huh? ...it queries the SCM periodically to check for changes.
If there are changes it kicks
ontinuum project a sense they are
all pointing in the same, metaphorical direction.
-Original Message-
From: news [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Adrian Herscu
Sent: Tuesday, February 21, 2006 3:55 PM
To: continuum-users@maven.apache.org
Subject: Re: Why Continuum?
Jonathan, than
I just went through this process this month. When I started I was using
maven 2.0 for my builds. Cruisecontrol did not have full support for it.(I
thought) So I started playing with Continuum, not as easy to setup as
Cruisecontrol.
After about a week playing with Continuum, I decided I just liked
Jonathan, thanks for your fast reply.
Finally, I have found a comparison here:
http://docs.codehaus.org/display/DAMAGECONTROL/Continuous+Integration+Server+Feature+Matrix
But, still I do not understand what is the "tighter integration with
Maven 2" all about. Using CC I still can invoke Maven (1 or
If you are looking for a richer feature set stick with CruiseControl.
Continuum is still relatively new and many features you have
CruiseControl are not yet available in Continuum.
I chose to try Continuum because of my simple build requirements which
will grow hopefully with the Continuum an
' 11600335.
>>>INFO | jvm 1| 2005/10/28 14:45:02 | There was no such logger
>>>'org.apache.maven.continuum.notification.ContinuumNotificationDispatcher'
>>>11600335.
>>>INFO | jvm 1 | 2005/10/28 14:45:02 | There was no such logger
>
your shell console or shell session is always open?
Emmanuel
Hong Xing a écrit :
> I starup continuum using command "./run.sh start". Continuum can run for a
> while(3 or 4 mins), then it stopped, but nobody stop it!
>
> wrapper.log:
>
> INFO | jvm 1| 2005/10/28 12:41:54 | [INFO] The app
