Re: [Trinidad] Portlet configuration

2007-06-18 Thread Scott O'Bryan
This reply is confusing. :) Oracle's 11 Bridge and Webcenter WILL work with Trinidad. 10.1.3.2 will not. Scott Scott O'Bryan wrote: Hey Chris, The 10.1.3.2 bridge will work with ADFFaces, not Trinidad. The 11 Bridge from the latest release should be mostly feature complete. The reason fo

Re: [Trinidad] Portlet configuration

2007-06-18 Thread Scott O'Bryan
onding bridge listener be required? Regards, Chris. *From:* Innes, Chris [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] *Sent:* Friday, 15 June 2007 11:13 PM *To:* MyFaces Discussion *Subject:* [Trinidad] Portlet configuration Hi all, I understand there are a number of issues/limitations around portletization an

Re: [Trinidad] Portlet configuration

2007-06-18 Thread Scott O'Bryan
Hey Chris, The 10.1.3.2 bridge will work with ADFFaces, not Trinidad. The 11 Bridge from the latest release should be mostly feature complete. The reason for this is that the 10.1.3.2 solution was done after ADFFaces was released so there was little effort in making it fully complete. Since t

RE: [Trinidad] Portlet configuration

2007-06-16 Thread Innes, Chris
riday, 15 June 2007 11:13 PM To: MyFaces Discussion Subject: [Trinidad] Portlet configuration Hi all, I understand there are a number of issues/limitations around portletization and Trinidad and that these issues will be resolved with JSR301. However, from what I've been reading it seems p

[Trinidad] Portlet configuration

2007-06-15 Thread Innes, Chris
Hi all, I understand there are a number of issues/limitations around portletization and Trinidad and that these issues will be resolved with JSR301. However, from what I've been reading it seems possible to expose a Trinidad portlet at this time if one accepts these limitations. I've been trying