That's great to hear. :-)
Gj
On Sat, Jun 2, 2018 at 1:12 AM, Derik Devecchio
wrote:
> Thanks!
> The two YouTube videos, especially JavaOne 2017,were exactly the kind of
> reference that I was asking for in my original question.
>
>
> —
> derik
>
>
>
> On Jun 1, 2018, at 11:51 AM, Geertjan Wiel
Thank You Antonio!
I didn't even think about the possibility, this project could be based
on sth. other than Maven ... rather strange, IMHO, having the whole
project structure and a POM.
Kind regards
Peter
Am 02.06.2018 um 06:18 schrieb Antonio:
Hi Peter,
After reading the documentation:
Hi Peter,
After reading the documentation: this is an ant based project!
I just run "ant" and I build the thing withing 5 seconds [1].
Maybe you want to try to import into NetBeans as an Ant project?
Cheers,
Antonio
[1]
[...]
[javac] Note: Recompile with -Xlint:unchecked for details.
Thanks!
The two YouTube videos, especially JavaOne 2017,were exactly the kind of
reference that I was asking for in my original question.
—
derik
On Jun 1, 2018, at 11:51 AM, Geertjan Wielenga
mailto:geertjan.wiele...@googlemail.com>>
wrote:
We start by running scripts through the files
Hi Antonio,
trying to build using NB was my first approach, of course, but resulted
in several problems.
When trying from the command line, I get following errors (Java9 is
default on my computer):
[ERROR] COMPILATION ERROR :
[INFO] -
For the record: installation of "Java EE Base" plugin enable maven web
project.
Just need to download a tomcat release and configure it in Netbeans, but
it's working fine.
May be it should be mentionned for users like me that are used to have a
full package.
Example :
https://old.reddit.com/r/java
Hi,
Can you run a plain Maven build in the command line? Is this a
Maven/pom.xml problem or a NetBeans problem?
If your objective is to build JavaCC from source, I don't think messing
with the pom.xml (as retrieved from github's master branch) is a good idea.
I imagine the JavaCC people hav
We start by running scripts through the files applicable to a particular
donation to verify that they’re Oracle or Sun licensed. In addition, some
cases individual people have put their own name in the copyright area in
which case we need to track them down to make sure the related code really
belo
Thanks for the rapid response. But I didn’t convey the meaning of my question.
So let me ask something more specific.
On the page you reference there is something like
Acceptance of Apache Software Grant Agreement
1. Done: 1st code donation
2. In process: 2nd code donation
In this contex
Hello,
I cloned JavaCC from "https://github.com/javacc/javacc.git"; and tried to
build it with NB 9.0 RC1. Of course, I first set the source/target
versions to 1.8.
[1] The source hierarchy looks a bit suspicious, most probably because
of several entries like the following in pom.xml:
src
I can't speak for other companies. I can't speak for other large donations
like this. I can only speak for the process that we're going through, have
been going through, since October 2016, and here it is:
https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/NETBEANS/Apache+Transition
Thanks,
Gj
On Fr
Gj,
Is there a web page somewhere that documents the process that a large company
like Oracle goes through to make a large donation like this?
It is probably more complicated than going to the Java group and saying “Pack
all your source code in a zip file and send it to Apache. Tell them to wr
Yup, you’re right. Might not always work smoothly but more often than not
should be fine.
Gj
On Friday, June 1, 2018, Michael Andrews wrote:
>
> Am I missing something? Aren’t all the plugins that make up the web
> experience available (and installable) from the plugins pane?
>
> I upgraded to
Am I missing something? Aren’t all the plugins that make up the web experience
available (and installable) from the plugins pane?
I upgraded to the RC last night, and found that installing the Java EE stuff
was super simple. Sure, they are not bundled as they use to be. But that is
just a tem
Yes, it does:
FYI, see the below for the donation status of features that have not been
donated to Apache yet, e.g., features for working with Java EE, JavaScript,
PHP, C/C++, and more:
https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/NETBEANS/Apache+Transition
Please be aware that we're in the proce
That blog does not mention any plans to donate those vital parts to make Apache NetBeans an IDE for (modern) Web
Applications.
Does that mean there is no such plan?
And yes, I am not a contributor - I am a user and have been for over 15 years.
The community does not only consist of contributor
No offence, but please read the blog:
https://blogs.apache.org/netbeans/entry/announce-apache-netbeans-incubating-91
Whoever you think "Oracle" is, Oracle is me, and many others in Oracle who
have contributed to Apache NetBeans from the beginning:
https://github.com/apache/incubator-netbeans/gra
No offense, but what use is a Java IDE in 2018 without support for web
applications?
If that is Oracle's secret plan to kill NetBeans by making it unusable for
professional development, it's working.
Is there at least a time frame on why Oracle wants to donate that? (If they
actually pan to d
18 matches
Mail list logo
