Sweet…will work within the parameters and see what is possible!
Standby…commercial organisation!
On 11 Jan 2019, at 15:49, Geertjan Wielenga
mailto:geertjan.wiele...@googlemail.com.INVALID>>
wrote:
Awesome!
Requirements:
https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/NETBEANS/NetBeans+Events
Awesome!
Requirements:
https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/NETBEANS/NetBeans+Events
Gj
On Fri, Jan 11, 2019 at 4:47 PM Luff,Chris
wrote:
> @Geertjan and others; Netbeans Day…if I had a venue, what are the
> prerequisites?
>
>
> CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE This message and any included attac
@Geertjan and others; Netbeans Day…if I had a venue, what are the prerequisites?
CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE This message and any included attachments are from
Cerner Corporation and are intended only for the addressee. The information
contained in this message is confidential and may constitute ins
The 5th button to the left in your toolbar -- what's that? I.e., which
plugins have you installed?
And if you have low memory problems, maybe there's something wrong with
your disk being full or something similar?
Gj
On Fri, Jan 11, 2019 at 12:46 PM Lister Jonathan <
jonathan.lis...@vaisala.com
Same behavior with CoolBeans.
On Fri, Jan 11, 2019 at 10:10 AM Tushar Joshi wrote:
> I remember JUnit 3.8.1 being used for many years even when JUnit 4 was the
> standard.
> Project have reluctance for shifting an existing JUnit library for many
> reasons.
>
> Given that we should have both JUnit versions 4.11 as well as 5.x
I think we should also ask ourselves if the IDE NetBeans must promote
JUnit 5 or not.
I don't see a big push from actual users for JUnit 5. And for most
users JUnit 4 is quite adequate (and I wonder how many are picking 5
because it's newer versus because they are actually missing something
in JUn
>
> JUnit 5 is supposed to co-exist
> with 4, or whether 4 is now done and everyone should be moving on.
>
I remember JUnit 3.8.1 being used for many years even when JUnit 4 was the
standard.
Project have reluctance for shifting an existing JUnit library for many
reasons.
Given that we should hav
On Thu, Jan 10, 2019 at 7:47 PM John McDonnell wrote:
> I think at a minimum it requires an upgrade to the bundled Ant version, and
> then some changes to some internal build.xml's (which I think is where I got
> lost previously)
NetBean's version of ant is 1.10.4 and that does have the
`junitla