On Fri, 22 Jun 2007 20:33:46 -0700
NoOp <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Forget voting against MS whatever; perhaps it's time to vote to just get
> back to a very solid, basic, OOo office package that will install and
> work properly with valid response/application times on multiple platforms.
Abiwor
I just fired up an old HP Vectra 5/75 that someone gave to me from a
school; this thing is a 75Mhz processor/32Mb of RAM, and a 2.3Gb drive -
it happens to have my wife's old files on it. It takes forever to boot
(Win95) perhaps 15 minutes. But once booted I find that it has MS Office
97 on it and
On 06/21/2007 02:01 AM, Jonathan.Hewitt wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Im really stuck. I need to distribute OpenOffice 2.2 to about 3000
> machines. I have got it to work in Group Policy, however I don't want
> it to prompt the user asking them if they want to auto update or to
> register the product. I have
On 06/20/2007 09:28 PM, Jonathan Kaye wrote:
> Rev. Mike wrote:
>
>> Hello,
>>
>> I have to say that, of all vendors, especially one that offers freeware,
>> you re rapid response is VERY welcome and much appreciated.
>>
>> It is FAR FAR above that of Verizon & Microsoft, 2 of the top vendors in
On 06/21/2007 12:25 PM, mahendar yadav wrote:
> Dear sir,
>
> I represent a start up company called Intellygence an online marketing firm
> that is into content management. I have just visited your website [
> www.openoffice.org], and liked what I have seen.
>
> We would like a text link on your
Hello Nawal,
It's because it is zipped. Try unzipping the file into an empty folder to get
the contents.
Hope this helps a bit.
Mhac
- Original Message
From: Nawal Kishore Gupta <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: users@openoffice.org
Sent: Thursday, June 21, 2007 5:50:06 PM
Subject: Re: [users] R
On 06/20/2007 11:47 PM, Russell Butler wrote:
> NoOp wrote:
>> Umm...
>>
>> http://www.google.com/search?hl=en&q=openoffice+%2Bmedical+dictionary
>>
>>
> Thanks NoOp,
>
> I notice actually several of those links are to my own posts! Others are
> to online services, which are really only useful
TerryJ wrote:
Hagar de l'Est wrote:
Hi All,
Please sign the petition here : http://www.noooxml.org/petition/
(cookies have to be enabled for this site)
Thanks,
Hagar
2466 votes at this very minute.
I appreciate your efforts, Hagar de l'Est. I saw your post on
8daysaweek.co.uk and vote
jonathon wrote:
I thought that the standards listed some languages as being
excluded from that set of rules.
You can tailor the Unicode Collation Algorithm to fit particular
languages. See http://unicode.org/charts/collation/ for some collations
for particular languages. Note that the OpenOf
Jonathan Kaye wrote:
Sorry for being thick. I suspected this might be a "feature" rather than a
bug. As I'm working on Namibian languages (Nama and Khoekhoegowab,
specifically) this is going to be a problem. "Phonemes" in these languages
are often expressed by digraphs or even trigraphs. They nee
To Jonathon: By then I will be to old to care! :-) :-D
jonathon wrote:
mike scott wrote:
I thought it seemed good to know /someone/ is looking at speech recognition,
Virtually all of the speech recognition work is done by
organizations that want closed source, and everything
wrapped
To Mike Scott: You have hit the nail on the head. I would not be
surprised if most of what is mentioned are dead in the water. What is
really needed is a Current list of viable voice dictation/os operation
programs in existence! :-(
mike scott wrote:
I thought it seemed good to know /someone/
Goudreau, Joel (NBPLS/SBPNB) wrote:
Hello,
I'm having a hard time finding the language packs. I have been all
through the OOo site look, have been to the L10n project site, yet I
still can't find a location to download the packs. I have one for ver
2.1 that I found somewhere though.
mike scott wrote:
> I thought it seemed good to know /someone/ is looking at speech recognition,
Virtually all of the speech recognition work is done by
organizations that want closed source, and everything
wrapped in patents. Couple that with the fact that most of
the R&D is going into embedded
Hagar de l'Est wrote:
Hi All,
Please sign the petition here : http://www.noooxml.org/petition/
(cookies have to be enabled for this site)
Thanks,
Hagar
2466 votes at this very minute.
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECT
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
SORRY! I was preoccupied this a.m. with other thoughts. I know you need the
other information, I guess I wasn't thinking properly.
Operating System is Windows XP
Yes, I have downloaded and installed it. Removed it and installed it again.
When I try to open it I get a
If you're looking for use space on a windows 2000 or above system, you
can't beat ExplorerXP. It's a freeware program available here:
http://www.explorerxp.com/
tc
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Thursday 21 June 2007 12:28:42 jonathon wrote:
Marleen Jongen wrote:
We have Vista Basic
If "ls -al"
jonathon wrote:
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
>
>> So, does Vista understand Linux shell commands?
>>
>
> I've forgotten what the name of the program is, but it
> installs most of the *Nix shell commands to Windows.
> Personally, I consider any computer that does not have the
> basic *Nix co
Hi Jon,
Jonathan.Hewitt wrote:
Im really stuck. I need to distribute OpenOffice 2.2 to about 3000
machines. I have got it to work in Group Policy, however I don't want it
to prompt the user asking them if they want to auto update or to
register the product. I have read that a file called resour
I thought it seemed good to know /someone/ is looking at speech
recognition, but the list below doesn't exactly inspire confidence:
On 21 Jun 2007 at 12:20, jonathon wrote:
> John wrote:
>
> > viable voice dictation/OS program if they really are concerned about
> > expanding the Linux base?
20 matches
Mail list logo
