Le 10.05.2010 19:24, Larry Gusaas a écrit :
>
> On 2010/05/10 10:54 AM James Wilde wrote:
>> Hi:
>>
>> I'm running 3.2.0 on a Mac running OSX 10.6.3.
>>
>> Every time I start OOo I get a notification that there is an
>> extension update waiting to be installed. It is French "Classic and
>> Reform
On 05/10/2010 01:56 AM, Jan van Hoek wrote:
>>> Maybe an installer issue?
>
> Maybe, maybe not. Anyway, it was NOT an Open Office 3.2 issue. I got more and
> more pieces of
> software that refused to install, exactly as described: keeping the CPU busy
> for 25% and not
> showing any progress.
On 5/10/2010 4:41 PM, Daniel Lewis wrote:
James Knott wrote:
JOE Conner wrote:
Not at all, because the same number is also be used for date AND time.
Both date and time are normally integers. Like with money, you
wouldn't normally use floating point because you can't be guaranteed
a corr
James Knott wrote:
JOE Conner wrote:
Not at all, because the same number is also be used for date AND time.
Both date and time are normally integers. Like with money, you
wouldn't normally use floating point because you can't be guaranteed a
correct result. With FP, you can get round off
JOE Conner wrote:
Not at all, because the same number is also be used for date AND time.
Both date and time are normally integers. Like with money, you wouldn't
normally use floating point because you can't be guaranteed a correct
result. With FP, you can get round off errors.
On 5/10/2010 1:34 PM, James Knott wrote:
JOE Conner wrote:
On 5/10/2010 10:13 AM, Tom Bracken wrote:
How can i sort on the date field in a sheet? Suppose the format is
mm/dd/. Won't it be sorted on month? Thanks.
Dates are stored as a floating point number. What you see is pure
format
On Mon, 2010-05-10 at 16:07 -0400, Tanstaafl wrote:
> Email was designed for one way communications. Yes, you can use it in a
> kind of conversation mode, but it is only workable if a basic set of
> rules is adhered to - which is why email lists generally have such
> rules. On this list, the gener
Tanstaafl skrev:
On 2010-05-10 3:06 PM, Erling Larsen wrote:
Don't litter ours inboxes with yet another mega-thread about top/bottom
posting. You will never come to an agreement..
Sorry, I thought this was the discuss list (again), where this kind of
thing is allowed...
I actually kin
On Mon, 2010-05-10 at 18:44 +0100, Harold Fuchs wrote:
> E-mail was designed for conversations. In a conversation it is not customary
> to repeat everything that's already been said before saying something new.
bg:
Which of course is why the generally accepted protocols call for
editing down th
JOE Conner wrote:
On 5/10/2010 10:13 AM, Tom Bracken wrote:
How can i sort on the date field in a sheet? Suppose the format is
mm/dd/. Won't it be sorted on month? Thanks.
Dates are stored as a floating point number. What you see is pure
formatting. The sort sorts on the number. In o
On 2010-05-10 3:06 PM, Erling Larsen wrote:
> Don't litter ours inboxes with yet another mega-thread about top/bottom
> posting. You will never come to an agreement..
Sorry, I thought this was the discuss list (again), where this kind of
thing is allowed...
I actually kind of enjoy debating this
Hi Tom
create a new column. If column A is a date column use in the new one the
formula =month(A). In the next step sort the sheet with the new column.
Franz
Tom Bracken schrieb:
How can i sort on the date field in a sheet? Suppose the format is
mm/dd/. Won't it be sorted on month? Th
On 5/10/2010 10:13 AM, Tom Bracken wrote:
How can i sort on the date field in a sheet? Suppose the format is
mm/dd/. Won't it be sorted on month? Thanks.
Dates are stored as a floating point number. What you see is pure
formatting. The sort sorts on the number. In other words, the for
On 2010-05-10 1:44 PM, Harold Fuchs wrote:
> On 10 May 2010 15:03, John Kaufmann wrote:
>> "Content of a follow-up post should exceed quoted content." Then Microsoft
>> introduced Outlook, with default behavior of posting above a fully-quoted
>> message, and top-posting soon became "normal"; a
On 2010-05-10 2:53 PM, John Kaufmann wrote:
> In a message dated 2010.05.10 13:44 -0500, Harold Fuchs wrote:
>> I was using e-mail before screens and before the local devices had
>> any storage. Messages had to be printed as they came down the wire.
>> If you top posted it meant the reader could hi
John -
MIT's Project MAC and other campus networks that were later
interconnected with DARPAnet: Treat bandwidth and readers' time as
valuable; edit messages for context and reply on-point. Still seems
like a nice idea to me.
-
I came to the Internet late. Started out on BBS nets, includ
How can i sort on the date field in a sheet? Suppose the format is
mm/dd/. Won't it be sorted on month? Thanks.
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@openoffice.org
For additional commands, e-mail
Harold Fuchs skrev:
On 10 May 2010 15:03, John Kaufmann wrote:
Hi Harold,
In a message dated 2010.05.10 03:49 -0500, Harold Fuchs wrote:
"Bottom posting" is placing your text below (at the bottom of) the text to
which you are replying. "Top posting" is placing your text above (on
In a message dated 2010.05.10 13:44 -0500, Harold Fuchs wrote:
I was using e-mail before screens and before the local devices had any
storage. Messages had to be printed as they came down the wire. If you top
posted it meant the reader could hit the Break/Interrupt key after reading
your stuff a
One of the "hardest sells" I face in trying to get Open Office.org
adopted in my school's [English] department is the complaint that legacy
MS PowerPoint files would not run well in OOo Impress. This was
especially when the presentation had embedded sound.
I'm getting ready to fight this battl
On 10 May 2010 15:03, John Kaufmann wrote:
> Hi Harold,
>
>
> In a message dated 2010.05.10 03:49 -0500, Harold Fuchs wrote:
>
> "Bottom posting" is placing your text below (at the bottom of) the text to
>> which you are replying. "Top posting" is placing your text above (on top
>> of)
>> the te
On 2010/05/10 10:54 AM James Wilde wrote:
Hi:
I'm running 3.2.0 on a Mac running OSX 10.6.3.
Every time I start OOo I get a notification that there is an extension update waiting to
be installed. It is French "Classic and Reform 1990" spelling, hyphenation and
thesaurus version 3.6. Now wi
Thomas Steel wrote:
Yes, and thanks. In Windows 7, you can use Start > Control Panel ,
Programs, Uninstall a program, select OpenOffice.org 3.2, and use the
Repair button at the top.
I was very excited to get this e-mail, because the solution seemed
simple. Alas, when I do it & click Repair
Hi:
I'm running 3.2.0 on a Mac running OSX 10.6.3.
Every time I start OOo I get a notification that there is an extension update
waiting to be installed. It is French "Classic and Reform 1990" spelling,
hyphenation and thesaurus version 3.6. Now without wishing to offend our
French users, I
--
From: "Barbara Duprey"
Sent: Monday, May 10, 2010 2:40 PM
To:
Subject: Re: [users] incomprehensible error message
Yes, and thanks. In Windows 7, you can use Start > Control Panel ,
Programs, Uninstall a program, select OpenOffice.org 3.2, an
On Mon, 2010-05-10 at 10:03 -0400, John Kaufmann wrote:
> Then Microsoft introduced Outlook, with default behavior of
> posting above a fully-quoted message, and top-posting soon became
> "normal";
bg:
Wrong on a couple of counts - I stand in awe that this is still so
widely misunderstood.
Hi Harold,
In a message dated 2010.05.10 03:49 -0500, Harold Fuchs wrote:
"Bottom posting" is placing your text below (at the bottom of) the text to
which you are replying. "Top posting" is placing your text above (on top of)
the text to which you are replying. There is a religious war about th
Thomas Steel wrote:
I apologise. I don't know what 'bottom posting' & 'top posting' mean.
If this is a 'top post', perhaps for a 'bottom post' it is possible to
type a reply at the end of all this script. I will try that now.
Please let me know if that doesn't work. TS
It worked. The most use
On 2010-05-10 4:42 AM, Harold Fuchs wrote:
> On 10 May 2010 09:32, Brewster Gillett wrote:
>> bg:
>>
>> This is hardly rocket science. Posts are more easily and conveniently
>> absorbed by the reader when they are arranged in their chronological
>> order, oldest at the top, newest at the bottom. T
On 2010-05-10 3:49 AM, Harold Fuchs wrote:
> "Bottom posting" is placing your text below (at the bottom of) the text to
> which you are replying. "Top posting" is placing your text above (on top of)
> the text to which you are replying. There is a religious war about the
> sanctity of the one and t
On 10-May-10 03:32, Brewster Gillett wrote:
On 10 May 2010 07:23, Thomas Steel wrote:
I apologise. I don't know what 'bottom posting'& 'top posting' mean. If
this is a 'top post', perhaps for a 'bottom post' it is possible to type a
reply at the end of all this script. I will try th
On 10-May-10 02:49, Harold Fuchs wrote:
On 10 May 2010 07:23, Thomas Steel wrote:
I apologise. I don't know what 'bottom posting'& 'top posting' mean. If
this is a 'top post', perhaps for a 'bottom post' it is possible to type a
reply at the end of all this script. I will try that now. Pl
On 5/7/2010 6:21 AM, ?? wrote:
Hi OOo team, as a developer base on OO I have a trouble now, this
is a defect in OO3.2. I expect to fix it in my software as soon as
possible, so, could you help me?could you transpond this mail to your
related developer if I made the wrong target mail. Thanks
On May 10, 2010, at 09:49 , Harold Fuchs wrote:
> On 10 May 2010 07:23, Thomas Steel wrote:
>
>> I apologise. I don't know what 'bottom posting' & 'top posting' mean. If
>> this is a 'top post', perhaps for a 'bottom post' it is possible to type a
>> reply at the end of all this script. I will
>> Maybe an installer issue?
Maybe, maybe not. Anyway, it was NOT an Open Office 3.2 issue. I got more and
more pieces of
software that refused to install, exactly as described: keeping the CPU busy
for 25% and not
showing any progress. The same happened to e.g. Java and LFI LANGuard.
I stu
On 10 May 2010 09:32, Brewster Gillett wrote:
>
> > On 10 May 2010 07:23, Thomas Steel wrote:
> >
> > > I apologise. I don't know what 'bottom posting' & 'top posting' mean.
> If
> > > this is a 'top post', perhaps for a 'bottom post' it is possible to
> type a
> > > reply at the end of all this
> On 10 May 2010 07:23, Thomas Steel wrote:
>
> > I apologise. I don't know what 'bottom posting' & 'top posting' mean. If
> > this is a 'top post', perhaps for a 'bottom post' it is possible to type a
> > reply at the end of all this script. I will try that now. Please let me know
> > if that d
--
From: "Harold Fuchs"
Sent: Monday, May 10, 2010 8:49 AM
To:
Subject: [users] OT: What is Bottom Posting? (was Re: [users]
incomprehensible error message)
On 10 May 2010 07:23, Thomas Steel wrote:
I apologise. I don't know what 'bottom p
On 10 May 2010 07:23, Thomas Steel wrote:
> I apologise. I don't know what 'bottom posting' & 'top posting' mean. If
> this is a 'top post', perhaps for a 'bottom post' it is possible to type a
> reply at the end of all this script. I will try that now. Please let me know
> if that doesn't work.
I have also OOo running under Windows XP, and all the Bold, Italic or
Underline commands work normally. I can modify any text with the special
buttons, or with the keyboard shortcuts. I would try the "Options"...
but you already did.
So I cannot help you. But be sure it is not a general error of
On 10 May 2010 08:15, James Elliott wrote:
> A new phenomenon has occurred in my OOo 3.2 running under Windows XP which
> I have never encountered before, and I have been using OOo since version 1.0
>
> When I select text and Bold it, it also becomes Italic in style. What's
> more, I cannot get
A new phenomenon has occurred in my OOo 3.2 running under Windows XP
which I have never encountered before, and I have been using OOo since
version 1.0
When I select text and Bold it, it also becomes Italic in style. What's
more, I cannot get rid of the Italics by selecting the text and click
42 matches
Mail list logo
