On 20 June 2011 01:03, James Knott wrote:
> RA Brown wrote:
>>
>> James Knott wrote:
>>
>>>
>>> A friend recently bought a new computer and she'll be wanting me to
>>> install OpenOffice (and some other apps) on it. The computer came with
>>> 64 bit Windows 7. Is there a 64 bit Windows version o
>> I have to say I thought the first link I gave was quite explicit. It
>> seems to give rather detailed instructions.
>>
>> What do you mean "I have *it* downloaded ..."? What is "it". I don't
>> think there is an "it" in this context.
>>
>> As to Scribus, perhaps you should ask in its support for
Well the New OOo website is now a day old and the OOo release of 2.4 is a
shorter than that. A new Web site hand in hand with a new OOo version. There
the absolute latest and your one of the first to use both in mint condition.
Cameron
On 28/03/2008, web at work <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
> I
>
> Looks calm and Approchable
Just an initial quick skim
The news page looks a little inconsistent compared with the other pages (The
left margin??)
The Download Page is better and the development snapshots more accessable is
good
On the Homepage
Maybe something on the homepage about What OOo
what I did
Cameron Smith
On 20/03/2008, Paul Elliott <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
> I have a Open Office presentation, with sound files attached
> to the various slides. I would like to convert it
> to video in a form that can be put on a DVD and displayed
> on an orda
://wiki.services.openoffice.org/wiki/OOoRelease24
It looks like the release is now set for 20 March 2008.
Cameron Smith
On 16/03/2008, RICHARD IWANOWSKI <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Dear Users:
> I started to use the Open Office suite last month and was glad to
> contribute $49.00
Not That I use the features of impress much but he mentions 3.0 will allow
multiple monitors for impress.
Didn't this get added in 2.1 or 2.2?
Cameron
On 10/02/2008, M Henri Day <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> List members might find Ryan Cartwright's Free Software Magazine article
> (*
> http://
Your Daughter will be able to open all her previous Microsoft Office Files.
The ones that have a *.doc/*.xls/*.ppt file extension. If your Daughter
starts using Microsoft Office 12 (a.k.a Microsoft Office 2007)
She is going to have to save any documents she want's to use at school or
share with ot
On 22/11/2007, Leslie Wright <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> Just a thought--
>
> This list has seen during my brief time here quite a few postings
> talking about purchasing OOo, getting license keys, shady offers to
> "buy" OOo on eBay and in other places, etc.
>
> Now I know that in a "ca
Unfortunately you would need to download the entire file (100meg) again.
If your updating from v 2.2 just running the file and having it install over
the existing installation is fine
Cameron Smith
On 09/08/2007, Nathaniel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Hope you don't mind
Unfortunately The entire bundle has to be downloaded, however you can just
install the Writer module of the package by using the custom install rather
than the full/fast or express install. On the next screen you can tell it to
install only writer (make sure the other modules show a red X beside t
SOLVED
I solved my own problem I just found the include JRE with Download checkbox
(on by default)
On 30/03/07, Cameron Smith <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I just tried to download OpenOffice 2.2 following the link from the
announcement =>download page
But Chose to cancel the down
The msg Title was OpenOffice.org announces Version 2.2 I'm not sure of the
mgs number
On 30/03/07, NoOp <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On 03/29/2007 06:03 PM, Dan Lewis wrote:
> On Thursday March 29 2007 7:51 pm, NoOp wrote:
>> Just noticed the recent questions regarding install etc., for 2.2
>> th
I just tried to download OpenOffice 2.2 following the link from the
announcement =>download page
But Chose to cancel the download
The Download page states for windows 93 MB and I assume thats OO w/out JRE
(ie it's the same size as many other previous releases) but the link when I
click downloads
There Was One.
It ended up being rather long Summary of the 2.2 Announcement
OO 2.2 released
OO 2.2 Main Feature Improvements across all platforms
OO is also A Community
Ended up looking a bit of A PR Press Release Statement
Cameron
On 30/03/07, NoOp <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Just noticed
While I think the whole community would like to see you complete step 4 it
is not neseccary to remove MS Office Immediately.
OpenOffice and MS Office can reside on the same machine.
If they're both on the same machine you may not want OO to load (open) MS
format files by default.
Just choose to
different formats I also would like to know how make a
copy of an OpenOffice
Base File that can be shared with Microsoft Users.
Cameron Smith
web.kracked wrote:
> Personally
> I would see how many customers would like to change
to Open Office
>
> I deal with several Historical Societi
ow with something else
that they could use the new software for instead).
Writer creates documents/letters, Newsletters. It is
Like MS Word
Calc used for calculations, budgets, Numbers. It is
Like MS Excel
Impress used to make presentations. It is Like MS
Power Point
Internet/Web browsing Firefox ha
s into v2.0
despite it having a
setting transfer step in the installation and you may
also need to download any
foreign language dictionarys you may use (if you use
languages other than U.S
English) as these also did not seem to transfer
across)
You should be impressed with
I have updated from OO 1.1.x to the current 2.0 And I
think this new version is
Great.
I would like to know if it is possible to recheck a
word using the spell checker
in 2.0
In 1.1.x there was a handy icon to indicate is the
word was spelled correctly
and you could put in various spellings an
t had
appeared as wonderfully in all its glory.
Making these details I've just given redundent.
So I think you can dismiss this
Cameron
Cameron Smith wrote:
Greetings
Following my reply to Bashar about the new website in Firefox. I would
like to provide some details for the website project crew
Greetings
Following my reply to Bashar about the new website in Firefox. I would
like to provide some details for the website project crew.
This is how the new website appears in Firefox 1.0.3
-- There is a skip to content link visible above the logo
-- The top tabs are a vertical unordered list
Hello Bashar
I don't think there is anything wrong with your settings of Firefox.
Firefox renders HTML and XHTML closer to the W3C standards than IE does.
Bashar wrote:
Hi,
The new OOo site appears widely streched in my FireFox 1.0.3 yet looks
quite normal in IE. Is there something wrong with my
23 matches
Mail list logo
