Re: [users] RPM order dependency

2005-12-07 Thread Dave Barton
OP not subscribed to list. On Wed, 2005-12-07 at 21:36 +0100, Sigrid Kronenberger wrote: > Hi Kevin, > > > Kevin Lidh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> schrieb: > > > I'm trying to install Open Office 2 on my White Box Linux computer. > > When I try to install the Core01 RPM, it says I need 2-8. When I try

Re: [users] RPM order dependency

2005-12-07 Thread Sigrid Kronenberger
Hi Kevin, Kevin Lidh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> schrieb: > I'm trying to install Open Office 2 on my White Box Linux computer. > When I try to install the Core01 RPM, it says I need 2-8. When I try > to install the Core02 RPM, it says I need 1. I'm kinda at a deadlock > right now. Is there a specia

[users] RPM order dependency

2005-12-07 Thread Kevin Lidh
I'm trying to install Open Office 2 on my White Box Linux computer. When I try to install the Core01 RPM, it says I need 2-8. When I try to install the Core02 RPM, it says I need 1. I'm kinda at a deadlock right now. Is there a special way to install without doing the --force option? ===

Re: [users] RPM install?!

2005-09-13 Thread Anton Solovyev
Where the heck is real distro for 2.0 beta that runs installer and installs where I told it to, not that RPM stuff?! Like a tgz or a deb or compile from source ? A .tgz that has a proper installer inside. The way version 1.1 is packaged: === OOo_1.1.5rc_050903_LinuxIntel_install.tar.gz drwxr

Re: [users] RPM install?!

2005-09-13 Thread CPHennessy
On Monday 12 September 2005 18:02, + Anton Solovyev wrote: > [ MODERATED ] *** > Where the heck is real distro for 2.0 beta that runs installer and > installs where I told it to, not that RPM stuff?! Like a tgz or a deb or compile from source ? What platform are you using ? P

[users] RPM install?!

2005-09-12 Thread Anton Solovyev
Where the heck is real distro for 2.0 beta that runs installer and installs where I told it to, not that RPM stuff?! -- Anton Solovyev - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECT

Re: [users] RPM

2005-06-28 Thread Robin Laing
Doug Thompson wrote: Robin Laing wrote: G. Roderick Singleton wrote: By default the OOo for FC4 is the beta 2.0. This is discussed on the Fedora list. I installed the 2.0 beta on FC1 with the RPM's from OOo site. Installed the current betas on Thursday. Just remember that the menu stuff

Re: [users] RPM

2005-06-27 Thread Doug Thompson
Robin Laing wrote: G. Roderick Singleton wrote: By default the OOo for FC4 is the beta 2.0. This is discussed on the Fedora list. I installed the 2.0 beta on FC1 with the RPM's from OOo site. Installed the current betas on Thursday. Just remember that the menu stuff is in a subdirectory.

Re: [users] RPM

2005-06-27 Thread Robin Laing
G. Roderick Singleton wrote: On Sat, 2005-06-25 at 01:55 -0700, Thomas Eric Johnson wrote: How can I get Open Office in an RPM format for Red Hat? Regards, Dr. John Not sure what you are asking. The stable release of OOo is 1.1.4 and may only be available with FC4. However, you can download

Re: [users] RPM

2005-06-25 Thread G. Roderick Singleton
On Sat, 2005-06-25 at 01:55 -0700, Thomas Eric Johnson wrote: > How can I get Open Office in an RPM format for Red > Hat? > Regards, > Dr. John Not sure what you are asking. The stable release of OOo is 1.1.4 and may only be available with FC4. However, you can download 1.1.3 from most RH mirrors.

Re: [users] RPM

2005-06-25 Thread Gene Heskett
On Saturday 25 June 2005 04:55, Thomas Eric Johnson wrote: >How can I get Open Office in an RPM format for Red >Hat? >Regards, >Dr. John > For linux, the Ooo-1.9-m109(check the actual dl for the right name though) package unpacks to an RPMS directory wherever you unpack it to. The contents of th

[users] RPM

2005-06-25 Thread Thomas Eric Johnson
How can I get Open Office in an RPM format for Red Hat? Regards, Dr. John __ Do You Yahoo!? Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around http://mail.yahoo.com -