[users] Re: Microsoft says Open Office.org 10 years behind

2006-03-09 Thread Max G. Kluth
Maybe this should be a starting point: http://www.melbpc.org.au/pcupdate/2412/2412article13.htm Well written, well read. Of course I assume that none of us fits the discription of the title. There are better books, but they are not likely to be in your friendly neighbourhood computer book store.

Re: [users] Re: Microsoft says Open Office.org 10 years behind

2006-03-08 Thread Cameron Smith
Liberty wrote: > On Wed, 8 Mar 2006 14:13:52 +, Alain Williams <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> On Wed, Mar 08, 2006 at 02:07:32PM -, Gordon Burgess-Parker wrote: >>> >>> -Original Message- >>> So: yes - people do need training in OO to bring them from M$ Office. >>> >>> As a "middl

[users] Re: Microsoft says Open Office.org 10 years behind

2006-03-08 Thread Liberty
On Wed, 8 Mar 2006 14:13:52 +, Alain Williams <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >On Wed, Mar 08, 2006 at 02:07:32PM -, Gordon Burgess-Parker wrote: >> >> >> -Original Message- >> So: yes - people do need training in OO to bring them from M$ Office. >> >> As a "middle-aged" computer use

[users] Re: Microsoft says Open Office.org 10 years behind

2006-03-08 Thread Max G. Kluth
That seems to be a problem nowadays, on this Continent. People know one thing, and one thing only. They have never learnt to be inquisitive or try to learn something new under their own steam. A fine example I remember is the complaint by a friend from the European Space Agency about NASA. Quote: t

Re: [users] Re: Microsoft says Open Office.org 10 years behind

2006-03-08 Thread Chad Smith
On 3/7/06, Max G. Kluth <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > : Another problem with your thinking is that you assume there will be an > : upgrade for OpenOffice.org. Seriously, who is to say there will be? > > The programmers. With their blood of their hearts. LOL! OMG! You got to be kidding me!

Re: [users] Re: Microsoft says Open Office.org 10 years behind

2006-03-08 Thread Andrew Fisk
On Mar 7, 2006, at 11:50 PM, Max G. Kluth wrote: : I know the one to call if it's a problem with MSO. Granted it will cost me : $35 a hour (or more) to call them - but it's there. : It's not as simple as it looks. It is as simple as it looks. I'm retired, and you just gave me an excellent

[users] Re: Microsoft says Open Office.org 10 years behind

2006-03-07 Thread Max G. Kluth
Well, get your flame throwers out, this will not be pleasant: : held up for me until next year. The point is, many firms operate under the : same kind of thought process - yes, I could spend $5 today to possibly save : me $100 next year, but I need the $5 now more than the 100 later. Precisely.