On 19/10/2007, Harold Fuchs <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
>
> On 18/10/2007, Richard J Neuenfeldt < [EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > I am sorry that I listed four combinations which is correct. But what
> > I meant in regards to equal is the first number times the second number
> > that came af
Dan Lewis wrote:
On Thursday October 18 2007 04:15 pm, Richard J Neuenfeldt wrote:
I am sorry that I listed four combinations which is correct. But what
I meant in regards to equal is the first number times the second number
that came after the slash "/". In other words 10 times 5 #s. Wha
On Thursday October 18 2007 04:15 pm, Richard J Neuenfeldt wrote:
> I am sorry that I listed four combinations which is correct. But what
> I meant in regards to equal is the first number times the second number
> that came after the slash "/". In other words 10 times 5 #s. What is
> occurring
On 18/10/2007, Richard J Neuenfeldt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> I am sorry that I listed four combinations which is correct. But what
> I meant in regards to equal is the first number times the second number
> that came after the slash "/". In other words 10 times 5 #s. What is
> occurring i
Richard J Neuenfeldt wrote:
I am sorry that I listed four combinations which is correct. But
what I meant in regards to equal is the first number times the second
number that came after the slash "/". In other words 10 times 5 #s.
What is occurring is that wheat and corn are forcing me to r
I am sorry that I listed four combinations which is correct. But what
I meant in regards to equal is the first number times the second number
that came after the slash "/". In other words 10 times 5 #s. What is
occurring is that wheat and corn are forcing me to raise prices five
cents a pou
