If you're looking for use space on a windows 2000 or above system, you
can't beat ExplorerXP. It's a freeware program available here:
http://www.explorerxp.com/
tc
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Thursday 21 June 2007 12:28:42 jonathon wrote:
Marleen Jongen wrote:
We have Vista Basic
If "ls -al"
jonathon wrote:
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
>
>> So, does Vista understand Linux shell commands?
>>
>
> I've forgotten what the name of the program is, but it
> installs most of the *Nix shell commands to Windows.
> Personally, I consider any computer that does not have the
> basic *Nix co
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> So, does Vista understand Linux shell commands?
I've forgotten what the name of the program is, but it
installs most of the *Nix shell commands to Windows.
Personally, I consider any computer that does not have the
basic *Nix commands installed to be crippled, dysfuncti
On Thursday 21 June 2007 22:20:17 James Knott wrote:
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> > On Thursday 21 June 2007 12:28:42 jonathon wrote:
> >> Marleen Jongen wrote:
> >>> We have Vista Basic
> >>
> >> If "ls -al" displays that as the size of the contents of
> >> your OOo directory
> >
> > So, does Vist
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> On Thursday 21 June 2007 12:28:42 jonathon wrote:
>
>> Marleen Jongen wrote:
>>
>>> We have Vista Basic
>>>
>> If "ls -al" displays that as the size of the contents of
>> your OOo directory
>>
>
> So, does Vista understand Linux shell commands?
>
>
On Thursday 21 June 2007 12:28:42 jonathon wrote:
> Marleen Jongen wrote:
> > We have Vista Basic
> If "ls -al" displays that as the size of the contents of
> your OOo directory
So, does Vista understand Linux shell commands?
--
http://webpages.charter.net/jlgates
--
Hi Marleen,
Are you referring to space used on your hard drive? If so, you should
know that all versions of Vista have feature like system restore, called
'previous versions', that backs up every file that is modified or
deleted in hidden disk space. In the basic version, the option to use
the
Marleen Jongen wrote:
> We have Vista Basic, can somebody explain the difference between 387 MB and
> 1,10 GB indicated above
If that is the size displayed in the add/remove programs
tool, ignore it. At best, the file size there is inaccurate.
If "ls -al" displays that as the size of the conte
On Thursday June 21 2007 5:47 am, Marleen Jongen wrote:
> Hi,
> We have Vista Basic, can somebody explain the difference between
> 387 MB and 1,10 GB indicated above ? Had XP on old PC from which
> 70% full of downloads - updates and patches from Microsoft, no need
> to say there was no room left
Hi,
We have Vista Basic, can somebody explain the difference between 387 MB and
1,10 GB indicated above ? Had XP on old PC from which 70% full of downloads -
updates and patches from Microsoft, no need to say there was no room left to
work with it and want to prevent this happens to new PC, don'
10 matches
Mail list logo
