Re: [users] spadmin-1.1.4 vs spadmin-1.19-m109

2005-06-28 Thread Gene Heskett
On Monday 27 June 2005 04:30, Philipp Lohmann - Sun Germany wrote: [...] > >> I get the impression that in RGB modes, its useing all color ink >> but no black to generate the blacks, whereas in the other modes, >> there should be some color under removal where black ink is subbed >> in those areas

Re: [users] spadmin-1.1.4 vs spadmin-1.19-m109

2005-06-27 Thread Gene Heskett
On Monday 27 June 2005 13:24, G. Roderick Singleton wrote: >On Mon, 2005-06-27 at 13:10 -0400, Gene Heskett wrote: >> On Monday 27 June 2005 08:21, G. Roderick Singleton wrote: >> >On Mon, 2005-06-27 at 10:30 +0200, Philipp Lohmann - Sun Germany > >[snipped] > >> Unforch, how I would file the examp

Re: [users] spadmin-1.1.4 vs spadmin-1.19-m109

2005-06-27 Thread Gene Heskett
On Monday 27 June 2005 13:16, G. Roderick Singleton wrote: >On Mon, 2005-06-27 at 13:10 -0400, Gene Heskett wrote: >> On Monday 27 June 2005 08:21, G. Roderick Singleton wrote: >> >On Mon, 2005-06-27 at 10:30 +0200, Philipp Lohmann - Sun Germany >> >> wrote: >> >> Hi, > >[snipped] > >> Unforch, how

Re: [users] spadmin-1.1.4 vs spadmin-1.19-m109

2005-06-27 Thread G. Roderick Singleton
On Mon, 2005-06-27 at 13:10 -0400, Gene Heskett wrote: > On Monday 27 June 2005 08:21, G. Roderick Singleton wrote: > >On Mon, 2005-06-27 at 10:30 +0200, Philipp Lohmann - Sun Germany > wrote: > >> Hi, > >> [snipped] > Unforch, how I would file the examples would be by scans from my epson > 125

Re: [users] spadmin-1.1.4 vs spadmin-1.19-m109

2005-06-27 Thread Gene Heskett
On Monday 27 June 2005 08:21, G. Roderick Singleton wrote: >On Mon, 2005-06-27 at 10:30 +0200, Philipp Lohmann - Sun Germany wrote: >> Hi, >> >> Gene Heskett wrote: >> > Greetings; >> > >> > Just now doing some tests to see how printing worked from >> > 1.1.9-m109 compared to 1.1.4, useing the two

Re: [users] spadmin-1.1.4 vs spadmin-1.19-m109

2005-06-27 Thread G. Roderick Singleton
On Mon, 2005-06-27 at 08:03 -0700, John Jordan wrote: > said: [snipped] > I had totally given up until this morning I got a message from someone on a > local Linux e-list that he had successfully installed the 2.0 beta on his > Debian machine. He gave me a couple more sources to add to my > s

Re: [users] spadmin-1.1.4 vs spadmin-1.19-m109

2005-06-27 Thread John Jordan
said: > There is no connection to CUPS in 1.1.4 at all. CUPS support is a 2.0 > feature unless you use one of the downports of e.g. debian or ximian. I have participated a bit in this thread because I have a problem printing to a network printer from OOo 1.1.3 on Ubuntu. OOo calls it "Generic

Re: [users] spadmin-1.1.4 vs spadmin-1.19-m109

2005-06-27 Thread G. Roderick Singleton
On Mon, 2005-06-27 at 15:22 +0200, Philipp Lohmann - Sun Germany wrote: > G. Roderick Singleton wrote: > > On Mon, 2005-06-27 at 14:37 +0200, Philipp Lohmann - Sun Germany wrote: > > > >>G. Roderick Singleton wrote: > >> > >>>On Mon, 2005-06-27 at 10:30 +0200, Philipp Lohmann - Sun Germany wrote:

Re: [users] spadmin-1.1.4 vs spadmin-1.19-m109

2005-06-27 Thread G. Roderick Singleton
On Mon, 2005-06-27 at 08:18 -0500, Dan Lewis wrote: > Is it possible that Philipp Lohmann is not aware that the user > guide for OOo was written with Ooo and then exported as PDF for the > printer? > > Dan Perhaps but the doc is mentioned so frequently and was announced on the OOo home pag

Re: [users] spadmin-1.1.4 vs spadmin-1.19-m109

2005-06-27 Thread Philipp Lohmann - Sun Germany
G. Roderick Singleton wrote: On Mon, 2005-06-27 at 14:37 +0200, Philipp Lohmann - Sun Germany wrote: G. Roderick Singleton wrote: On Mon, 2005-06-27 at 10:30 +0200, Philipp Lohmann - Sun Germany wrote: The pdf of the User Guide that went to the printer used CMYK and has reproduced nicely from

Re: [users] spadmin-1.1.4 vs spadmin-1.19-m109

2005-06-27 Thread Dan Lewis
Is it possible that Philipp Lohmann is not aware that the user guide for OOo was written with Ooo and then exported as PDF for the printer? Dan On Monday 27 June 2005 07:57 am, G. Roderick Singleton wrote: > On Mon, 2005-06-27 at 14:37 +0200, Philipp Lohmann - Sun Germany wrote: > > G. Ro

Re: [users] spadmin-1.1.4 vs spadmin-1.19-m109

2005-06-27 Thread G. Roderick Singleton
On Mon, 2005-06-27 at 14:37 +0200, Philipp Lohmann - Sun Germany wrote: > G. Roderick Singleton wrote: > > On Mon, 2005-06-27 at 10:30 +0200, Philipp Lohmann - Sun Germany wrote: > > The pdf of the User Guide that went to the printer used CMYK and has > > reproduced nicely from 1.1.4. > > Fine. Wh

Re: [users] spadmin-1.1.4 vs spadmin-1.19-m109

2005-06-27 Thread Philipp Lohmann - Sun Germany
G. Roderick Singleton wrote: On Mon, 2005-06-27 at 10:30 +0200, Philipp Lohmann - Sun Germany wrote: The pdf of the User Guide that went to the printer used CMYK and has reproduced nicely from 1.1.4. Fine. What does that have to do with OOo ? I have attached a screenshot from m109 that certai

Re: [users] spadmin-1.1.4 vs spadmin-1.19-m109

2005-06-27 Thread G. Roderick Singleton
On Mon, 2005-06-27 at 10:30 +0200, Philipp Lohmann - Sun Germany wrote: > Hi, > > Gene Heskett wrote: > > Greetings; > > > > Just now doing some tests to see how printing worked from 1.1.9-m109 > > compared to 1.1.4, useing the two versions own spadmin utils. > > > > Starting with the m109 vers

Re: [users] spadmin-1.1.4 vs spadmin-1.19-m109

2005-06-27 Thread Philipp Lohmann - Sun Germany
Hi, Gene Heskett wrote: Greetings; Just now doing some tests to see how printing worked from 1.1.9-m109 compared to 1.1.4, useing the two versions own spadmin utils. Starting with the m109 version I see it has most of the cups options available, and that it defaulted to CMYK color model mod

[users] spadmin-1.1.4 vs spadmin-1.19-m109

2005-06-26 Thread Gene Heskett
Greetings; Just now doing some tests to see how printing worked from 1.1.9-m109 compared to 1.1.4, useing the two versions own spadmin utils. Starting with the m109 version I see it has most of the cups options available, and that it defaulted to CMYK color model mode. I ran a test page. Ver