On 21-Oct-2009, at 14:31, Bowie Bailey wrote:
If you can do the spam and virus scanning during the original smtp
transaction, you can reject viruses and high-scoring spam with a 5xx
error at that point, but once your server accepts the mail, your
choices
are to deliver it (to the inbox or a sp
Fixed
Michael Monnerie wrote:
http://ipadmin.junkemailfilter.com/remove.php?ip=62.40.128.130
Just received this FP from a customer. That IP is indeed an MX for
kabsi.at, a big cable provider in Austria. Please put it on YELLOW.
mfg zmi
John Hardin wrote:
On Wed, 21 Oct 2009, Ted Mittelstaedt wrote:
We had a customer one time who for nonsensical political and stupid
reasons wasn't using us as the circuit provider, and was instead using
a dynamically-numbered DSL line from qwest.net.
They never had problems sending or receivin
Ted Mittelstaedt wrote:
> LuKreme wrote:
>> On 20-Oct-2009, at 17:03, Evan Platt wrote:
>>> At 03:58 PM 10/20/2009, you wrote:
Domains cost about $10 a year. Static IP addresses depend on your ISP.
Some are cheap, some are not, and some won't do it at all. However,
you do not have to
On Wed, 21 Oct 2009, Ted Mittelstaedt wrote:
We had a customer one time who for nonsensical political and stupid
reasons wasn't using us as the circuit provider, and was instead using
a dynamically-numbered DSL line from qwest.net.
They never had problems sending or receiving mail doing this an
Karsten Bräckelmann wrote:
> On Thu, 2009-10-22 at 03:43 +0800, Care4U wrote:
>
>> I would like to host some virtual domains. I had decided to install qmail,
>> vpopmail, simscan, clamav, spamassassin and maildrop. I will be providing 2
>> types of mail packages. The first package comes with fil
LuKreme wrote:
On 20-Oct-2009, at 17:03, Evan Platt wrote:
At 03:58 PM 10/20/2009, you wrote:
Domains cost about $10 a year. Static IP addresses depend on your ISP.
Some are cheap, some are not, and some won't do it at all. However,
you do not have to have a static IP. You can use a service lik
On Thu, 2009-10-22 at 03:43 +0800, Care4U wrote:
> I would like to host some virtual domains. I had decided to install qmail,
> vpopmail, simscan, clamav, spamassassin and maildrop. I will be providing 2
> types of mail packages. The first package comes with filtering, and the
> second does not, de
Dear all,
I would like to host some virtual domains. I had decided to install qmail,
vpopmail, simscan, clamav, spamassassin and maildrop. I will be providing 2
types of mail packages. The first package comes with filtering, and the
second does not, depending on preference of the domain owner. For
- Original Message -
From: "Daniel J McDonald"
To:
Sent: Wednesday, October 21, 2009 9:21 PM
Subject: Re: Mail not scanned
On Wed, 2009-10-21 at 18:59 +0200, Lars Ebeling wrote:
I am running SA 3.2.5 on HP-UX 11.11. I am using postfix as MTA.
http://pastebin.com/m612529a7
The in
On Wed, 2009-10-21 at 18:59 +0200, Lars Ebeling wrote:
> I am running SA 3.2.5 on HP-UX 11.11. I am using postfix as MTA.
>
> http://pastebin.com/m612529a7
>
> The interface is configured in master.cf
It's 42K, so check that you don't have a size limit.
When I scan it I get:
X-Spam-Report:
> http://ipadmin.junkemailfilter.com/remove.php?ip=62.40.128.130
Just received this FP from a customer. That IP is indeed an MX for
kabsi.at, a big cable provider in Austria. Please put it on YELLOW.
mfg zmi
--
// Michael Monnerie, Ing.BSc- http://it-management.at
// Tel: 0660 / 41
21.10.2009 18:40, Lars Ebeling kirjoitti:
> Why aren't mail from "United Parcel Service" scanned?
>
> The last 24 hours have i got about 20 of them and none scanned.
>
>
Those are not scanned in *my* system just because they are scanned by
amavisd-new before they will be scanned by SA. As the
At 07:09 PM 10/20/2009, you wrote:
That's a reason for not accepting mail from that host, but why would
a server refuse to deliver there?
I'd have to agree there
Let's say you are yourdomain.com, I am mydomain.com . You send mail
to m...@mydomain.com . Your server looks up the mx for myd
From: "Ralf Hildebrandt"
To:
Sent: Wednesday, October 21, 2009 5:59 PM
Subject: Re: Mail not scanned
* Lars Ebeling :
Why aren't mail from "United Parcel Service" scanned?
What makes you think so?
Since I don't get any :
X-Spam-Virus: No
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.2.5 (2008
I am running SA 3.2.5 on HP-UX 11.11. I am using postfix as MTA.
http://pastebin.com/m612529a7
The interface is configured in master.cf
Regards
Lars
- Original Message -
From: "Kevin Parris"
To:
Sent: Wednesday, October 21, 2009 5:46 PM
Subject: Re: Mail not scanned
In this sit
On Wed, 2009-10-21 at 17:40 +0200, Lars Ebeling wrote:
> Why aren't mail from "United Parcel Service" scanned?
>
> The last 24 hours have i got about 20 of them and none scanned.
>
>
check the size of the messages, see if the embedded images make it
larger than your cutoff...
But a pastebin ex
* Lars Ebeling :
> Why aren't mail from "United Parcel Service" scanned?
What makes you think so?
> The last 24 hours have i got about 20 of them and none scanned.
Maybe they got scanned and just went through.
Scanned for what, anyway?
--
Ralf Hildebrandt
Geschäftsbereich IT | Abteilung Net
In this situation I believe Spock would say "Insufficient Data" . . .
What o/s are you running? What is your mail handling software? How does that
mail handling software interface to SpamAssassin? Are you sure the items were
not scanned, or are you simply bothered that they were not marked as
Why aren't mail from "United Parcel Service" scanned?
The last 24 hours have i got about 20 of them and none scanned.
--
Regards
Lars Ebeling
http://leopg9.no-ip.org
Hobbithobbyist
"I am not young enough to know everything."
-- Oscar Wilde
On Wednesday 21 October 2009, Martin Gregorie wrote:
>On Wed, 2009-10-21 at 01:34 -0400, Gene Heskett wrote:
>> On Tuesday 20 October 2009, Martin Gregorie wrote:
>> >[getmail] does the same job as fetchmail, but without some of the bugs
>> > and with better documentation and easier configuration.
On Wed, 2009-10-21 at 01:34 -0400, Gene Heskett wrote:
> On Tuesday 20 October 2009, Martin Gregorie wrote:
> >[getmail] does the same job as fetchmail, but without some of the bugs and
> >with
> >better documentation and easier configuration. A nice touch is that you
> >can use a fetchmail MDA s
22 matches
Mail list logo
