> --[ UxBoD ]-- wrote:
> > policyd works a treat :) V2 is also in development aswell.
> >
>
> it's not the same. I don't know why they call it V2.
> As far as I know, Cami is no more involved. so I would stick
> with the "current" (which is a single C threaded program).
So you still prefer po
> policyd works a treat :) V2 is also in development aswell.
I will take in account your judge..
:-)
rocsca
--[ UxBoD ]-- wrote:
policyd works a treat :) V2 is also in development aswell.
it's not the same. I don't know why they call it V2.
As far as I know, Cami is no more involved. so I would stick with the
"current" (which is a single C threaded program).
policyd works a treat :) V2 is also in development aswell.
Regards,
--
--[ UxBoD ]--
// PGP Key: "curl -s http://www.splatnix.net/uxbod.asc | gpg --import"
// Fingerprint: F57A 0CBD DD19 79E9 1FCC A612 CB36 D89D 2C5A 3A84
// Keyserver: www.keyserver.net Key-ID: 0x2C5A3A84
// Phone: +44 845 869 2
> > What do I need to set up GL? Only the command below or there is
> > something other parameter that I could set up (eg: the time spent
> > before a message is accepted and so on)?
> >
> >
>
> of course, you need to install a policy server! Cami's
> policyd is a good choice (it also has ot
Rocco Scappatura wrote:
And spammer are becoming more faster as the time goes on.. Is it
convenient to use gray listing
newer bots retry, so GL is only effective is the time
interval is large enough, but that's not a neutral thing so
should be restricted to suspicious mail. That's what I
> > And spammer are becoming more faster as the time goes on.. Is it
> > convenient to use gray listing
>
> newer bots retry, so GL is only effective is the time
> interval is large enough, but that's not a neutral thing so
> should be restricted to suspicious mail. That's what I use GL
> for
Rocco Scappatura wrote:
% telnet yourserver 25
...
EHLO somehostname
...
MAIL FROM:
...
RCPT TO:
DATA
copy-patse the message with full headers except the Delivered-To that
contains your recipient address
end with a line containing a dot ('.') like this:
.
QUIT
Infact I get:
Feb 26 23:07:5
On Tue, 2008-02-26 at 23:14 +0100, Rocco Scappatura wrote:
> And spammer are becoming more faster as the time goes on.. Is it
> convenient to use gray listing or there is something other effective
> tecnique that I could use to reduce false negative?
Grey-listing helps, but seldom because the UR
> % telnet yourserver 25
> ...
> EHLO somehostname
> ...
> MAIL FROM:
> ...
> RCPT TO:
> DATA
> copy-patse the message with full headers except the Delivered-To that
> contains your recipient address
> end with a line containing a dot ('.') like this:
> .
> QUIT
Infact I get:
Feb 26 23:07:50 av4
Rocco Scappatura wrote:
Rocco Scappatura wrote:
[snip]
Sorry It was not the case to send the entire email.. Here the
X-Spam-Status after running the message against 'spamassassin -D':
X-Spam-Status: Yes, score=11.2 required=5.0
tests=AWL,BAYES_50,HTML_MESSAGE,
RATWARE_MS_H
> Rocco Scappatura wrote:
>>> [snip]
>>
>> Sorry It was not the case to send the entire email.. Here the
>> X-Spam-Status after running the message against 'spamassassin -D':
>>
>> X-Spam-Status: Yes, score=11.2 required=5.0
>> tests=AWL,BAYES_50,HTML_MESSAGE,
>>
>> RATWARE_MS_HASH,RATWARE_OUTL
Rocco Scappatura wrote:
[snip]
Sorry It was not the case to send the entire email.. Here the
X-Spam-Status after running the message against 'spamassassin -D':
X-Spam-Status: Yes, score=11.2 required=5.0
tests=AWL,BAYES_50,HTML_MESSAGE,
RATWARE_MS_HASH,RATWARE_OUTLOOK_NONAME,RDNS_NONE,URIBL
> > Since some days the number of SMTP connections rejected by
> my server
> > is increased (maybe doubled). It doesn't worry me. But
> there is a side
> > effect because even the number of false negative is increased.
> >
> > For example, at the moment a spam message with this header is
> >
Rocco Scappatura wrote:
Hello,
Since some days the number of SMTP connections rejected by my server is
increased (maybe doubled). It doesn't worry me. But there is a side
effect because even the number of false negative is increased.
For example, at the moment a spam message with this header i
Hello,
Since some days the number of SMTP connections rejected by my server is
increased (maybe doubled). It doesn't worry me. But there is a side
effect because even the number of false negative is increased.
For example, at the moment a spam message with this header is considered
clean by Amav
16 matches
Mail list logo
