Re: Backporting features from trunk to 1.6.x

2011-06-22 Thread Stefan Sperling
On Wed, Jun 22, 2011 at 07:25:13PM +0300, Daniel Shahaf wrote: > Stefan Sperling wrote on Tue, Jun 21, 2011 at 13:52:37 +0200: > > The backports simply fall under the terms of the old licence when > > they get released. But then again, the project owns copyright to > > these changes in the first pl

Re: Backporting features from trunk to 1.6.x

2011-06-22 Thread Daniel Shahaf
Stefan Sperling wrote on Tue, Jun 21, 2011 at 13:52:37 +0200: > The backports simply fall under the terms of the old licence when > they get released. But then again, the project owns copyright to > these changes in the first place :) The project does not own the copyright to an individual patch t

Re: Backporting features from trunk to 1.6.x

2011-06-21 Thread Stefan Sperling
On Tue, Jun 21, 2011 at 01:29:56PM +0200, Björn Kasteleiner wrote: > Hello, > > I'm new to the subversion users mailing list. > > Due to a larger subversion server setup, I would like to backport the > AuthzSVNReposRelativeAccessFile feature of the Apache authz module. > This backport patch is b

Backporting features from trunk to 1.6.x

2011-06-21 Thread Björn Kasteleiner
Hello, I'm new to the subversion users mailing list. Due to a larger subversion server setup, I would like to backport the AuthzSVNReposRelativeAccessFile feature of the Apache authz module. This backport patch is based on the revisions 1030536 and 1071781. Except one small change due to missin