On 25/05/2012 21:40, Hermes Flying wrote:
> Creating a new Thread as Pid recommended:
> Concerning the questions posed by Konstantin Kolinko:
>>> You do not say what jars are exactly where and what actual
>>> configuration (server.xml and logging) you have.
> I am not sure I follow: you mean the ve
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hermes,
A: Because it's hard to read.
Q: Why shouldn't I top-post?
- -chris
On 5/25/12 4:40 PM, Hermes Flying wrote:
> Creating a new Thread as Pid recommended: Concerning the questions
> posed by Konstantin Kolinko:
>>> You do not say what jars ar
Creating a new Thread as Pid recommended:
Concerning the questions posed by Konstantin Kolinko:
>>You do not say what jars are exactly where and what actual
>>configuration (server.xml and logging) you have.
I am not sure I follow: you mean the version? I have log4j in the WEB-INF\xml,
and commons
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Chad,
On 5/25/12 3:31 PM, chad.da...@emc.com wrote:
> I'm trying to convert my app to use the preferred catalina base
> and home deployment.
I dunno about /preferred/, but it certainly is flexible.
> I understand that this allows for easier migratio
chad.da...@emc.com wrote:
I'm trying to convert my app to use the preferred catalina base and home deployment. I understand that this allows for easier migration between tomcat versions, etc.
Maybe that is a slight misconception. I think that the separation between catalina_base
and catalina
I'm trying to convert my app to use the preferred catalina base and home
deployment. I understand that this allows for easier migration between tomcat
versions, etc. As a point of reference, I'm reading about how to do this in
Tomcat: The Definitive Guide. Also, I'm dealing with 5.5.35, if th
On 25 May 2012, at 19:21, Mark Eggers wrote:
>>
>> From: Christopher Schultz
>> To: Tomcat Users List
>> Sent: Friday, May 25, 2012 9:57 AM
>> Subject: Re: mod_jk not working !!
>>
>> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
>> Hash: SHA1
>>
>> Chuck,
>>
>> On 5/25/12
>
> From: Christopher Schultz
>To: Tomcat Users List
>Sent: Friday, May 25, 2012 9:57 AM
>Subject: Re: mod_jk not working !!
>
>-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
>Hash: SHA1
>
>Chuck,
>
>On 5/25/12 12:41 PM, Caldarale, Charles R wrote:
>>> From: Mark Eggers [mai
GOOD loadbalancer (loadbalancer,app-03)
[Fri May 25 11:52:52 2012] [24754:1138370880] [debug]
wc_get_worker_for_name::jk_worker.c (115): found a worker loadbalancer
[Fri May 25 11:52:52 2012] [24754:1138370880] [debug]
wc_get_name_for_type::jk_worker.c (292): Found worker type 'lb'
[Fri May 25 1
>
> What if you remove the jkstatus worker?
>
worker.list=app-03,loadbalancer
app-03: works
loadbalancer: does NOT work (503)
worker.list=loadbalancer,app-03
app-03: does NOT work (503)
loadbalancer: works
> What if you put jkstatus at the end of the list?
>
worker.list=app-03,loadbalancer,j
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Chuck,
On 5/25/12 12:41 PM, Caldarale, Charles R wrote:
>> From: Mark Eggers [mailto:its_toas...@yahoo.com] Subject: Re:
>> mod_jk not working !!
>
>
>> I'll try to give a few general directions.
>
>
>
>> Again, start simply.
>
>> 1. Stock Apach
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Tony,
On 5/25/12 12:07 PM, Anthony J. Biacco wrote:
> worker.list=jkstatus,app-03,loadbalancer loadbalancer: does NOT
> work (503) app-03: works
>
> worker.list=jkstatus,loadbalancer,app-03 loadbalancer: works
> app-03: does NOT work (503)
>
> work
> From: Mark Eggers [mailto:its_toas...@yahoo.com]
> Subject: Re: mod_jk not working !!
> I'll try to give a few general directions.
> Again, start simply.
> 1. Stock Apache HTTPD installation (and verify)
> 2. Stock Apache Tomcat installation (and verify)
> 3. mod_jk installation (and verif
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Tony,
On 5/25/12 12:07 PM, Anthony J. Biacco wrote:
> If I take the worker out of the worker list, then the loadbalancer
> works. But then accessing the worker by itself it doesn't. It seems
> to be based on the worker.list ordering
>
> Here's the b
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Mark,
On 5/25/12 12:26 PM, Mark Eggers wrote:
> . . . just my three cents (since this is long)
More like twelve bucks: you should send this guy a bill for the
message you just put together for him.
- -chris
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: Gnu
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Aman,
On 5/25/12 1:25 AM, Aman Arora wrote:
> I'm trying to do a setup of tomcat clustering in which one tomcat
> is on port 8080 and other one is on 8081.
Sounds reasonable.
> i have downloaded the tomcat-connector in the modules folder of my
> apa
>
> From: Aman Arora
>To: users@tomcat.apache.org
>Sent: Thursday, May 24, 2012 10:25 PM
>Subject: mod_jk not working !!
>
>m trying to do a setup of tomcat clustering in which one tomcat is on port
>8080 and other one is on 8081.
>i have downloaded the tomcat-conn
>
> > I'm sure that once we had 'must not be in worker.list',
> > but someone changed that to 'should' inside
> > http://tomcat.apache.org/connectors-doc/reference/workers.html
> > (see balance_workers directive)
> >
> >
>
> Probably needs to be changed back, or a strong warning added.
>
And t
> On 05/24/2012 09:40 PM, Anthony J. Biacco wrote:
> >
> >
> > I'm still puzzled as to why this behavior just changed between .35
and
> > .36
> >
>
> OK, but if you follow the recommended configuration
> by making sure that workers which are members of lb are not
> listed inside worker.list, does
On Fri, May 25, 2012 at 1:29 PM, Mladen Turk wrote:
> On 05/25/2012 11:28 AM, Martin Knoblauch wrote:
>>
>> On Fri, May 25, 2012 at 6:45 AM, Mladen Turk wrote:
>>>
>>> On 05/24/2012 09:40 PM, Anthony J. Biacco wrote:
I'm still puzzled as to why this behavior just changed
On 25/05/2012 10:03, Hermes Flying wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I have upgraded from Tomcat 5.5 to Tomcat 6.0.35
> I am getting java.lang.NoClassDefFoundError:
> org.apache.commons.logging.LogFactory
> I didn't have this problem before.
> Note that I have commons-logging already in my web apps WEB-INF\lib
>
2012/5/25 Hermes Flying :
> Hi,
>
> I have upgraded from Tomcat 5.5 to Tomcat 6.0.35
> I am getting java.lang.NoClassDefFoundError:
> org.apache.commons.logging.LogFactory
> I didn't have this problem before.
> Note that I have commons-logging already in my web apps WEB-INF\lib
> And this exceptio
On 05/25/2012 11:28 AM, Martin Knoblauch wrote:
On Fri, May 25, 2012 at 6:45 AM, Mladen Turk wrote:
On 05/24/2012 09:40 PM, Anthony J. Biacco wrote:
I'm still puzzled as to why this behavior just changed between .35 and
.36
OK, but if you follow the recommended configuration
by making su
On Fri, May 25, 2012 at 6:45 AM, Mladen Turk wrote:
> On 05/24/2012 09:40 PM, Anthony J. Biacco wrote:
>>
>>
>>
>> I'm still puzzled as to why this behavior just changed between .35 and
>> .36
>>
>
> OK, but if you follow the recommended configuration
> by making sure that workers which are member
That's strange. It's working fine for many other people, on thousands of
websites.
Maybe it is your configuration that is not working ?
" is not working !!" is about the best subject that can be imagined, if your intention
was to not get any response at all. The only missing parts are ca
Hi,
I have upgraded from Tomcat 5.5 to Tomcat 6.0.35
I am getting java.lang.NoClassDefFoundError:
org.apache.commons.logging.LogFactory
I didn't have this problem before.
Note that I have commons-logging already in my web apps WEB-INF\lib
And this exception is from a class (custom class) running
On Thu, May 24, 2012 at 1:19 PM, Peter Roßbach wrote:
> HI Vadzim,
>
> as you like a hot HTTP-JMX access use
>
> http://www.jolokia.org/
>
> chili...
>
> Peter
>
>
> Am 23.05.2012 um 00:06 schrieb Vadzim Mikhalenak:
>
> > On Wed, May 23, 2012 at 12:31 AM, Konstantin Kolinko <
> knst.koli...@gmail
27 matches
Mail list logo
