>> I am using Tomcat 7.0.42 and Tomcat jdbc pool.
>Just to be perfectly clear, how are you using this? With a
tag in your Tomcat >configuration or are you creating the pool in your
code? Either way, include the necessary >config or code which shows how
you've defined the pool.
The pool configu
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Mark,
On 11/7/13, 4:44 PM, Mark Thomas wrote:
> On 07/11/2013 21:10, Christopher Schultz wrote:
>
>> Can you describe the effective difference between my
>> over-simplified description and what is implemented in
>> commons-pool (ignoring thread-fa
On Nov 7, 2013, at 1:24 PM, Christopher Schultz
wrote:
> But nobody in their right mind uses
> "../../../.." to get to the context-path (which, by definition is
> relative to the host)... instead they use request.getContextPath() and
> then tack-on a context-relative link to the end of it.
You
On 07/11/2013 21:10, Christopher Schultz wrote:
> Can you describe the effective difference between my
> over-simplified description and what is implemented in commons-pool
> (ignoring thread-fairness, which I'll admit is a very useful
> feature)?
For starters, the relatively expensive validation
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Dan,
On 11/7/13, 2:43 PM, Daniel Mikusa wrote:
> On Nov 7, 2013, at 2:08 PM, Crystal Maramba
> wrote:
>
>> Thanks, Dan. That helps a lot.
>
> Please don't top post. Reply inline or at the bottom.
>
>> 2) a. I was referring to importing another
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Dale,
On 11/6/13, 5:50 PM, Dale Ogilvie wrote:
> Chris made the following good suggestion in another thread:
>
> "Can I make a suggestion? Fix your web application so it can
> cleanly un-deploy and re-deploy and then simply do a hot
> deployment?"
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Milo,
On 11/7/13, 2:46 PM, Milo Hyson wrote:
> On Nov 7, 2013, at 7:57 AM, Christopher Schultz
> wrote:
>
>> The only way to reliably mutate context-paths during proxying is
>> to re-write the headers and content of the pages. It's
>> miserable.
>
Mark Thomas [mailto:ma...@apache.org] wrote:
>In short, if there is something the Tomcat developers can do to help then we
>would love to do so - just let us know.
Many thanks Mark, I'll definitely take careful notes next time I look at this
and report back.
Dale
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Mark,
On 11/7/13, 11:14 AM, Mark Thomas wrote:
> On 07/11/2013 16:03, Christopher Schultz wrote:
>> Yogesh,
>>
>> On 11/7/13, 10:58 AM, yogesh hingmire wrote:
>>> While looking to upgrade to tomcat7, i understand the
>>> connection pool is a major
On 11/7/2013 12:51 PM, Mark Thomas wrote:
> On 07/11/2013 18:20, Bob DeRemer wrote:
>> Guys,
>>
>> I wanted to follow back around on some of the websocket load testing
>> we’ve been doing in EC2.The good news is, we were able to get 100K
>> websockets connected directly to a single Tomcat insta
On Nov 7, 2013, at 7:59 AM, Christopher Schultz
wrote:
> What I'm saying is that from a practical point of view, when writing
> dynamic web applications, context-relative links are always the way to go.
>
> I'm not sure how much more I can say on this topic and nobody else
> seems to care so I'
On Nov 7, 2013, at 7:57 AM, Christopher Schultz
wrote:
> The only way to reliably mutate context-paths during proxying is to
> re-write the headers and content of the pages. It's miserable.
Perhaps YOUR experiences have been miserable, but clearly that's not the case
for everyone. The only hea
On Nov 7, 2013, at 2:08 PM, Crystal Maramba wrote:
> Thanks, Dan. That helps a lot.
Please don't top post. Reply inline or at the bottom.
> 2) a. I was referring to importing another certificate to the same .keystore
> that Instance1 is using.
A keystore file can contain multiple certificate
> -Original Message-
> From: Mark Thomas [mailto:ma...@apache.org]
> Sent: Thursday, November 07, 2013 1:52 PM
> To: Tomcat Users List
> Subject: Re: (working) high load (100K+) websocket + NIO connector setting
> comparison on 1 Tomcat 7 instance
>
> On 07/11/2013 18:20, Bob DeRemer wro
Thanks, Dan. That helps a lot.
2) a. I was referring to importing another certificate to the same .keystore
that Instance1 is using.
3) The tomcat-users.xml file is used to store the user and password for the
tomcat manager which is used to deploy .war files.
-Original Message-
From: Da
On 07/11/2013 18:20, Bob DeRemer wrote:
> Guys,
>
> I wanted to follow back around on some of the websocket load testing
> we’ve been doing in EC2.The good news is, we were able to get 100K
> websockets connected directly to a single Tomcat instance (EASILY)
Excellent.
> My theory is it’s a
On Nov 7, 2013, at 12:46 PM, Crystal Maramba wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I am getting ready to deploy the Second Instance of Tomcat on the same server
> using different IP addresses.
>
> \Tomcat\Instance1 (IP Address: xx.xx.xx.x1)
> \Tomcat\Instance2 (IP Address: xx.xx.xx.x2)
>
> I have a few question,
Guys,
I wanted to follow back around on some of the websocket load testing we've been
doing in EC2.The good news is, we were able to get 100K websockets
connected directly to a single Tomcat instance (EASILY) - once we got the
settings right. As a result, I wanted to post my results here f
Do you know what the syntax would be to have the AJP and Shutdown port bind to
the IP? Would it be the same "address="xx.xx.xx.xx"".?
For ex:
-Original Message-
From: David kerber [mailto:dcker...@verizon.net]
Sent: Thursday, November 07, 2013 10:00 AM
To: Tomcat Users List
Subject: R
On 11/7/2013 12:46 PM, Crystal Maramba wrote:
Hi,
I am getting ready to deploy the Second Instance of Tomcat on the same server
using different IP addresses.
\Tomcat\Instance1 (IP Address: xx.xx.xx.x1)
\Tomcat\Instance2 (IP Address: xx.xx.xx.x2)
I have a few question, see below:
1) For
Hi,
I am getting ready to deploy the Second Instance of Tomcat on the same server
using different IP addresses.
\Tomcat\Instance1 (IP Address: xx.xx.xx.x1)
\Tomcat\Instance2 (IP Address: xx.xx.xx.x2)
I have a few question, see below:
1) For the Tomcat server ports, I will be using the Con
In tomcat's svn history I see that looked method was added to InstanceManager
(tomcat-api) when Back-porting JSR-356:
+ public Object newInstance(Class clazz)
+ throws IllegalAccessException, InvocationTargetException, NamingException,
+ InstantiationException;
+
However, I solved the problem
On Wed, Nov 06, 2013 at 02:18:36PM -0700, Jay Vee wrote:
> I subscribed to this email list using the digest format; How do I freaking
> reply now?
Ask the people who made your email user agent. It's their problem.
Digest format is standardized, but every client implementation is
different.
> I s
Thank you everyone!
I have already combined bin folders.
And yes, I was aware of that. And we are using 64-bit windows. That hasn't
changed.
Prior, the client did not state that they needed the windows service which is
why I had to purge and merge files.
-Original Message-
From: Kons
While debuging I see that
httpUpgradeHandlerClass in upgrade of org.apache.catalina.connector.Request
is
class org.apache.tomcat.websocket.server.WsHttpUpgradeHandler
InstanceManager is org.apache.catalina.core.DefaultInstanceManager
in the source code of my maven dependency of tomcat-api-7.0.47
On 07/11/2013 16:08, Christopher Schultz wrote:
> Mark,
>
> On 11/7/13, 11:03 AM, Mark Thomas wrote:
>> On 07/11/2013 15:58, yogesh hingmire wrote:
>>> While looking to upgrade to tomcat7, i understand the
>>> connection pool is a major improvement. I read that
>>>
>>> commons-dbcp is single thre
On 07/11/2013 16:03, Christopher Schultz wrote:
> Yogesh,
>
> On 11/7/13, 10:58 AM, yogesh hingmire wrote:
>> While looking to upgrade to tomcat7, i understand the connection
>> pool is a major improvement. I read that
>
>> commons-dbcp is single threaded, in order to be thread safe
>> commons-
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Mark,
On 11/7/13, 11:03 AM, Mark Thomas wrote:
> On 07/11/2013 15:58, yogesh hingmire wrote:
>> While looking to upgrade to tomcat7, i understand the connection
>> pool is a major improvement. I read that
>>
>> commons-dbcp is single threaded, in o
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Jeff,
On 11/7/13, 10:17 AM, Jeffrey Janner wrote:
>> -Original Message- From: Leo Donahue - OETX
>> [mailto:leodona...@mail.maricopa.gov] Sent: Wednesday, November
>> 06, 2013 4:29 PM To: Tomcat Users List Subject: [OT] RE: Baked-in
>> conte
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Yogesh,
On 11/7/13, 10:58 AM, yogesh hingmire wrote:
> While looking to upgrade to tomcat7, i understand the connection
> pool is a major improvement. I read that
>
> commons-dbcp is single threaded, in order to be thread safe
> commons-dbcp locks
On 07/11/2013 15:58, yogesh hingmire wrote:
> While looking to upgrade to tomcat7, i understand the connection pool is a
> major improvement. I read that
>
> commons-dbcp is single threaded, in order to be thread safe commons-dbcp
> locks the entire pool, even during query validation.
Where did y
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Leo,
On 11/6/13, 6:06 PM, Leo Donahue - OETX wrote:
>> From: Leo Donahue - OETX [mailto:leodona...@mail.maricopa.gov]
>> Subject: RE: Baked-in context paths
>>
>>
>> I'm not convinced relative links are bad, nor that one should not
>> try to use
While looking to upgrade to tomcat7, i understand the connection pool is a
major improvement. I read that
commons-dbcp is single threaded, in order to be thread safe commons-dbcp
locks the entire pool, even during query validation.
So as i understand, the connection pool will be locked when handi
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Milo,
On 11/6/13, 5:22 PM, Milo Hyson wrote:
> I wasn't trying to "play games," I was trying to route HTTP
> requests. Again, this is something I have done, without incident,
> for many years. It's possible I've just been lucky, but it's also
> poss
I think I moved forward. I changed version of javaee-web-api from 6.0 to
7.0:
javaxjavaee-
web-api6.0provided
to:
javaxjavaee-
web-api7.0provided
However now I get an error on the server side:
SEVERE: Servlet.service() for servlet [default] in context with path []
threw exception [Filter execution
On Nov 6, 2013, at 4:24 PM, Marko Sanković wrote:
> Nick, thanks for your quick response.
>
> Unfortunately, specifying javax.websocket.server.ServerEndpointConfig.
> Configurator is still not enough. This is what I have tried so far:
>
> @ServerEndpoint(value = "/wsendpoint", configurator =
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Leo Donahue - OETX [mailto:leodona...@mail.maricopa.gov]
> Sent: Wednesday, November 06, 2013 4:29 PM
> To: Tomcat Users List
> Subject: [OT] RE: Baked-in context paths
>
> >-Original Message-
> >From: Leo Donahue - OETX [mailto:leodona...@mail.maricopa
Hello,
I am migrating my websocket application to the new API with version 7.0.47.
How can correctly make a configuration of tomcat7-maven-plugin to use
tomcat7-websocket on localhost.
Here what I have in my pom:
...
...
org.apache.tomcattomcat-catalina
org.apache.tomcattomcat-coyote
org.apac
On Nov 6, 2013, at 11:23 PM, Muhammad Ali Orakzai wrote:
First, please don't top post. This comment is an example of top posting.
Instead reply inline, like the rest of my comments, or at the end.
> I am using GUI version of tomcat and heap memory has been configured to
> 500M min and 1000M m
On Nov 7, 2013, at 2:07 AM, Anu Prab wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I am using Tomcat 7.0.42 and Tomcat jdbc pool.
Just to be perfectly clear, how are you using this? With a tag in
your Tomcat configuration or are you creating the pool in your code? Either
way, include the necessary config or code which
On Nov 7, 2013, at 8:37 AM, Mark Thomas wrote:
> On 06/11/2013 17:35, Daniel Mikusa wrote:
>> Is this possibly related to the recent changes listed here?
>>
>> http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/tomcat-dev/201311.mbox/%3c52783299.5000...@apache.org%3e
>
> Guilty as charged.
>
> I've fixe
On 06/11/2013 17:35, Daniel Mikusa wrote:
> Is this possibly related to the recent changes listed here?
>
> http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/tomcat-dev/201311.mbox/%3c52783299.5000...@apache.org%3e
Guilty as charged.
I've fixed this specific error along with some related issues.
Thanks f
On 06/11/2013 22:50, Dale Ogilvie wrote:
> Chris made the following good suggestion in another thread:
>
> "Can I make a suggestion? Fix your web application so it can cleanly
> un-deploy and re-deploy and then simply do a hot deployment?"
>
> I've been down this track with our own Spring web app
Hi Chris,
On Sat, Nov 2, 2013 at 7:04 PM, Christopher Schultz <
ch...@christopherschultz.net> wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA256
>
> Vidyadhar,
>
> On 11/1/13, 11:31 PM, Vidyadhar wrote:
> > Hi Konstantin,
> >
> > On 2 Nov 2013 01:06, "Konstantin Kolinko"
> > wrote:
> >>
44 matches
Mail list logo
