Re: mod_jk - fail_on_status per LB, not per worker

to make mod_jk do something it wasn't designed to do. Hopefully this enhancement will make it onto your to-do list at some point. I'll be patient, if you need any help in testing this, let me know... regards James Masson Rainer Jung wrote: > No easy idea. At the moment, fail_on_sta

mod_jk - fail_on_status per LB, not per worker

web-app on each server - but that config will be ridiculously complex, and I'll likely have problems with jvmRoute variables, and such. Any ideas? thanks James Masson ** Confidentiality : This e-mail and any attachments

Re: mod_jk - more than 15 workers = hang

Usually the size should be big enough to handle 64 workers (including ajp13, load balancers and lb sub workers). You can check, the size that is being used on your system and then double it via JkShmSize and try again. Let us know your results. One question: James Masson wrote: Hi, I'

mod_jk - more than 15 workers = hang

going wrong? thanks James Masson ### [Wed Jan 31 09:55:09 2007] [32523:1728] [error] validate::jk_lb_worker.c (1206): allocating worker record from shared memory [Wed Jan 31 09:55:09 2007] [32523:1728] [error] wc_create_worker::jk_worker.c (161): validate failed for managementLogic