Re: clarification on "Correct error in fix for 49683"

2012-02-09 Thread Janne Jalkanen
Just to confirm - 7.0.25 seems to solve the problem for the most part. /Janne On 24 Jan 2012, at 10:53, Janne Jalkanen wrote: > > Been running 7.0.25 in production now for a day and the fd leak seems at > least mitigated somewhat. lsof still lists a few open sockets left by >

Re: clarification on "Correct error in fix for 49683"

2012-01-24 Thread Janne Jalkanen
Been running 7.0.25 in production now for a day and the fd leak seems at least mitigated somewhat. lsof still lists a few open sockets left by Tomcat, but this is less than what 7.0.23/.22 was doing. I will continue to run this a bit further and report back in a day or two whether the situatio

Re: help analyzing thread dump for Tomcat 7.0.23 issue

2012-01-03 Thread Janne Jalkanen
>> What were those 4 RUNNABLE threads doing? > > They were processing POST requests from the client with a somewhat > large data payload. Just wanted to pop in and say that my app does also get large POST requests AND uses APR AND has problems on 7.0.23. Perhaps my FD leak is related to this?

Re: File leak in 7.0.23?

2012-01-01 Thread Janne Jalkanen
> OK. Sounds like APR/native has an issue. There was a fair bit of refactoring > in 7.0.22. > > I'll see if I can reproduce it. A simple test case may help. Should I open a bug now on the issue tracker? /Janne - To unsubscribe,

Re: File leak in 7.0.23?

2012-01-01 Thread Janne Jalkanen
> If you take heap dumps can you see an Increase in the number of sockets? What should I be looking for, assuming that the problem is with APR connection? Any particular class? /Janne - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@

Re: File leak in 7.0.23?

2012-01-01 Thread Janne Jalkanen
seeing the FD leak, whenever APR+native is enabled. /Janne On Dec 31, 2011, at 23:05 , Mark Thomas wrote: > On 31/12/2011 13:38, Janne Jalkanen wrote: >>> Which Connector are you using? >> >>> connectionTimeout="2"

Re: File leak in 7.0.23?

2011-12-31 Thread Janne Jalkanen
> What if you remove the command-line switch > -Dcom.sun.management.jmxremote.port= > ? No effect. > Also, what does > netstat -pan | grep > have to say ? Nothing unusual (i.e. stuff I wouldn't expect) or different from the other instances: Database connections, listening on 8080, etc. It loo

Re: File leak in 7.0.23?

2011-12-31 Thread Janne Jalkanen
dies a slow > horrible death on Tomcat 7.0.23. It would seem that a bug was > introduced in either 7.0.22 or 7.0.23. > > > > On Sat, Dec 31, 2011 at 6:48 AM, André Warnier wrote: >> Janne Jalkanen wrote: >>>> >>>> When did the problem start occurring a

Re: File leak in 7.0.23?

2011-12-31 Thread Janne Jalkanen
> When did the problem start occurring and what else has changed? Exactly at the time when I upgraded to 7.0.23. I don't recall making any other modifications (I would've suspected them first ;-) I will try to downgrade to 7.0.22 and lower to try and see if there's a difference between Tomcat

Re: File leak in 7.0.23?

2011-12-31 Thread Janne Jalkanen
> Which Connector are you using? > What is the minimum that is required to reproduce the issue? Wish I knew. This is from our production cluster, so I'm a bit hesitant to start experimenting with it. However, there was no configuration change between 7.0.20 and 7.0.23, I just shut down t

File leak in 7.0.23?

2011-12-31 Thread Janne Jalkanen
Hi all! I am seeing odd behaviour with 7.0.23, with the tomcat user's open file count increasing slowly, but consistently. Two other instances running the exact same codebase on identical hardware, BUT with Tomcat 7.0.20, are not exhibiting the same behaviour. 7.0.20 is rock solid, 7.0.23 dies