Re: Servlet 3.1 asynchronous processing API

2014-07-09 Thread Marko Asplund
sin 4.0.40. What could be causing this? A bug in my servlet code? The code and results can be found here: https://github.com/marko-asplund/servlet3-async marko

Re: Servlet 3.1 asynchronous processing API

2014-07-09 Thread Marko Asplund
On Wed, 09 Jul 2014 09:59 Martin Grigorov wrote: > Casting ServletResponse to HttpServletResponse is OK most of the time. You > can check with "instanceof" before doing the cast. > But casting AsyncContext to HttpServletResponse is way too brave. Quite true, I'm not usually that courageous on pur

Re: Servlet 3.1 asynchronous processing API

2014-07-09 Thread Marko Asplund
On 09/07/2014 09:16, Mark Thomas wrote: > > There's a couple of parts in particular that I'm wondering about: > > - what's the correct way to deliver error response to client? Can I just > > cast the response acquired from AsyncContext to HttpServletResponse and use > > the normal Servlet API mech

Re: Servlet 3.1 asynchronous processing API

2014-07-09 Thread Marko Asplund
On Wed, 09 Jul 2014 07:23 Martin Grigorov wrote: > > ... > > try { > > response = (HttpServletResponse)asyncContext; > > > > Maybe it is implementation detail that this cast works but usually you have > to use > http://docs.oracle.com/javaee/6/api/javax/servlet/AsyncContext.html#

Servlet 3.1 asynchronous processing API

2014-07-08 Thread Marko Asplund
Hi, I'm just starting out with using the Servlet 3.1 asynchronous processing API. I use the API for generating response content, that can potentially be a slow process, in another thread. The code appears to be working, but since the specification contains many caveats, I'd like to try and verify

Webapp HTTP proxy authentication

2013-08-16 Thread Marko Asplund
Hi, We're developing webapps running on Tomcat 7. The apps use third-party components that we can't modify and those components connect to external sites using HTTP. Our ops guys have a policy of routing all outbound traffic through an authenticating HTTP proxy. This is a bit of problem for us sin

Re: Apache httpd reverse proxy setup

2012-11-06 Thread Marko Asplund
Chris Schultz wrote: > On 10/31/12 3:55 PM, Marko Asplund wrote: > > There are at least 3 different approaches for configuring Apache > > httpd 2.2 to act as a reverse proxy for Tomcat 7.0: > > > > a) mod_proxy_http b) mod_proxy_ajp c) mod_jk > > > > ... &

Re: Apache httpd reverse proxy setup

2012-11-04 Thread Marko Asplund
On 31/10/2012 20:08:21 GMT, Mark Thomas wrote: > http://www.tomcatexpert.com/blog/2010/06/16/deciding-between-modjk-modproxyhttp-and-modproxyajp > > The mod_proxy_ajp stability issues are less of an issue now than they > were when I wrote that article. What that means is if you want the SSL > bene

Apache httpd reverse proxy setup

2012-10-31 Thread Marko Asplund
Hi, There are at least 3 different approaches for configuring Apache httpd 2.2 to act as a reverse proxy for Tomcat 7.0: a) mod_proxy_http b) mod_proxy_ajp c) mod_jk There's been quite a lot of discussion about the differences of each one but a lot of that discussion appears to be either not ver