Re: “Virtual hosting” with port removed?

2015-02-11 Thread Micky Hulse
On Wed, Feb 11, 2015 at 12:35 AM, André Warnier wrote: > Just be careful when doing this, that an "undeploy" of your application > would not delete much more than what you are prepared for. Ahh, good tip. Had not realized that could be a possibility. Thanks André! :) Cheers, Micky -

Re: “Virtual hosting” with port removed?

2015-02-11 Thread André Warnier
Micky Hulse wrote: I just wanted to say thanks to everyone for the help. I ended up downloading Tomcat directly from the Tomcat site and got that up-and-running super fast. In the end, I opted to not worry about spoofing/vhosting anything. Maybe down the road, but for right now I've been fine w

Re: “Virtual hosting” with port removed?

2015-02-10 Thread Micky Hulse
I just wanted to say thanks to everyone for the help. I ended up downloading Tomcat directly from the Tomcat site and got that up-and-running super fast. In the end, I opted to not worry about spoofing/vhosting anything. Maybe down the road, but for right now I've been fine with symlinking my Git

RE: “Virtual hosting” with port removed?

2015-02-01 Thread Caldarale, Charles R
> From: Zala Pierre GOUPIL [mailto:goupilpie...@gmail.com] > Subject: Re: “Virtual hosting” with port removed? > If you use Tomcat alone (without Apache or any other web servers), you'll > have to find a way to have it listen on the port 80 (there a some of them > available

Re: “Virtual hosting” with port removed?

2015-02-01 Thread Zala Pierre GOUPIL
Ho, just to be sure: never ever launch Tomcat with root privileges. Right? :-) On Mon, Feb 2, 2015 at 1:39 AM, Zala Pierre GOUPIL wrote: > Good evening, > > If you use Tomcat alone (without Apache or any other web servers), you'll > have to find a way to have it listen on the port 80 (there a so

Re: “Virtual hosting” with port removed?

2015-02-01 Thread Zala Pierre GOUPIL
Good evening, If you use Tomcat alone (without Apache or any other web servers), you'll have to find a way to have it listen on the port 80 (there a some of them available on the web). Because Tomcat uses the port 8080 by default. In such a situation, you can't remove the port number: no port num

Re: “Virtual hosting” with port removed?

2015-02-01 Thread Micky Hulse
Thanks for tips Hassan! I really appreciate it! I'll follow your suggestions and take another stab at it. I'll post back here with my results. > On Feb 1, 2015, at 2:46 PM, Hassan Schroeder > wrote: > Why? Download the real thing, untar, done. No questions about > packaging issues. Who knows

Re: “Virtual hosting” with port removed?

2015-02-01 Thread Hassan Schroeder
On Sun, Feb 1, 2015 at 1:04 PM, Micky Hulse wrote: > I'm using Bitnami's Tomcat 8.0.18-0 Dev (64-bit) installer for OS X Yosemite. Why? Download the real thing, untar, done. No questions about packaging issues. Who knows what this thing does? > https://gist.github.com/mhulse/9c1278fa73a7a62be8e

“Virtual hosting” with port removed?

2015-02-01 Thread Micky Hulse
Hello, I'm using Bitnami's Tomcat 8.0.18-0 Dev (64-bit) installer for OS X Yosemite. Here's my relevant code: https://gist.github.com/mhulse/9c1278fa73a7a62be8ef I have a `hosts` entry for 127.0.0.1 spoofing `tomcat.local`. Problem: I can't get the vhost working without the port number. Goal