Re: A question about mod_jk 1.2.28 configuration

2009-11-20 Thread thomas2004
al commands, e-mail: users-h...@tomcat.apache.org -- View this message in context: http://old.nabble.com/A-question-about-mod_jk-1.2.28-configuration-tp26264069p26443598.html Sent from the Tomcat - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

Re: A question about mod_jk 1.2.28 configuration

2009-11-20 Thread Rainer Jung
On 20.11.2009 09:03, thomas2004 wrote: > >> Scroll back to Rainer's message dated 17/11/2009. > There is a question there. The answer to that question is what Rainer > is waiting for. > > > Ok, here again Rainer's question: > > >> I know, that you have seen a problem, the errno=11 thing. I n

Re: A question about mod_jk 1.2.28 configuration

2009-11-20 Thread thomas2004
rrno=11 in the mod_jk.log now. As I said in my last post, the developer changed the program so it will not return PDF-stream but simply plain text. What I get is posted in my former post. Does Rainer need further info? I will supply him. -- View this message in context: http://old.nabble.c

Re: A question about mod_jk 1.2.28 configuration

2009-11-19 Thread André Warnier
thomas2004 wrote: Rainer is asking you a question, here. If you can work with him, I'm sure he'll be able to diagnose and possibly solve your problem. Sorry for my misunderstanding Rainer's question. I can surely work with him. Just tell me how and in which way. I will try my best. Scroll b

Re: A question about mod_jk 1.2.28 configuration

2009-11-19 Thread thomas2004
ew this message in context: http://old.nabble.com/A-question-about-mod_jk-1.2.28-configuration-tp26264069p26421227.html Sent from the Tomcat - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@tom

Re: A question about mod_jk 1.2.28 configuration

2009-11-18 Thread Christopher Schultz
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Thomas, On 11/18/2009 2:26 AM, thomas2004 wrote: >> I know, that you have seen a problem, the errno=11 thing. I need to >> know, whether *this* problem (errno=11, which is your original PDF >> generation problem) also happens, when no socket-timeout a

Re: A question about mod_jk 1.2.28 configuration

2009-11-17 Thread thomas2004
w a mod_jk problem and therefore is of no interest for me at the moment. Let's concentrate on the test case with errno=11. Ok. Hope to hear good news soon. -- View this message in context: http://old.nabble.com/A-question-about-mod_jk-1.2.28-configuration-tp26264069p26403187.html Sent

Re: A question about mod_jk 1.2.28 configuration

2009-11-17 Thread Rainer Jung
Hello Thomas, On 17.11.2009 11:05, thomas2004 wrote: > >> I think the reproduction with html is not working because of some other > reasons likely not related with mod_jk. In the original message he has a > jk error message referring to errno 11=EAGAIN. There is a change between > 1.2.26 and 1.2.

Re: A question about mod_jk 1.2.28 configuration

2009-11-17 Thread thomas2004
y one can check if this problem has to do with mod_jk (or apache httpd) version or not. Regards Thomas -- View this message in context: http://old.nabble.com/A-question-about-mod_jk-1.2.28-configuration-tp26264069p26387241.html Sent from the Tomcat - User mailing list arc

Re: A question about mod_jk 1.2.28 configuration

2009-11-17 Thread thomas2004
working and that 1.2.28 was not working. Has that changed? This problem doesn't occur by the machine where the mod_jk1.2.26 and Apache 2.0.46 installed. This problem occurs by the machine where mod_jk 1.2.28 and Apache 2.0.52 installed. -- View this message in context: http://old.nabble.com/A-

Re: A question about mod_jk 1.2.28 configuration

2009-11-13 Thread Rainer Jung
On 13.11.2009 15:49, Christopher Schultz wrote: > Thomas, > > On 11/13/2009 2:55 AM, thomas2004 wrote: >> Sorry, the return page this time should just contains simply text, somewhat >> like "Generated in 0 msec[query time: 22186 msec, processing time: 20 >> msec] for 36 contracts. ", not a PDF

Re: A question about mod_jk 1.2.28 configuration

2009-11-13 Thread Christopher Schultz
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Thomas, On 11/13/2009 2:55 AM, thomas2004 wrote: > Sorry, the return page this time should just contains simply text, somewhat > like "Generated in 0 msec[query time: 22186 msec, processing time: 20 > msec] for 36 contracts. ", not a PDF-stream si

Re: A question about mod_jk 1.2.28 configuration

2009-11-13 Thread thomas2004
the stop button on the browser), But when I move the same workers.properties configuration to another machine with mod_jk 1.2.26 and Apache/2.0.52, it works fine. So I thing it might lie on mod_jk or Apache version. Hope you understood my problem now. -- View this message in context: h

Re: A question about mod_jk 1.2.28 configuration

2009-11-13 Thread André Warnier
thomas2004 wrote: I cannot tell you what's wrong, but I can tell you that the log you show below, shows that the JBoss response is a HTML document, not a PDF. So maybe you have to revise some of your assumptions. Sorry, you are right. This time I haven't test the PDF generation since I just w

Re: A question about mod_jk 1.2.28 configuration

2009-11-13 Thread thomas2004
t to test the simple case. The returned page contains only text. But I can't get the return page though long after the processing on Jboss is finished and send back the render. On the machine with mod_jk-1.2.26 I can get the return page. -- View this message in context: http://old.nabble.co

Re: A question about mod_jk 1.2.28 configuration

2009-11-12 Thread thomas2004
nux ES release 4 (Nahant Update 8) 64 bit I am not sure these make different. -- View this message in context: http://old.nabble.com/A-question-about-mod_jk-1.2.28-configuration-tp26264069p26332661.html Sent from the Tomcat - User mailing list archi

Re: A question about mod_jk 1.2.28 configuration

2009-11-12 Thread André Warnier
thomas2004 wrote: log-message in mod_jk.log Continue: But it's still a HTML response, not a PDF. [code] [Thu Nov 12 16:08:15 2009] [9280:2537062720] [debug] wc_maintain::jk_worker.c (339): Maintaining worker worker_portfolio_son1 [Thu Nov 12 16:08:15 2009] [9280:2537062720] [debug] ajp_reset

Re: A question about mod_jk 1.2.28 configuration

2009-11-12 Thread André Warnier
thomas2004 wrote: ... I cannot tell you what's wrong, but I can tell you that the log you show below, shows that the JBoss response is a HTML document, not a PDF. So maybe you have to revise some of your assumptions. ... 00 00 FF 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 - 0... [Thu Nov 12 15:50

Re: A question about mod_jk 1.2.28 configuration

2009-11-12 Thread Christopher Schultz
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Thomas, On 11/12/2009 10:12 AM, thomas2004 wrote: > I issue a request from the client (browser) to the to generate the report. > On Jboss-log I can watch as follow: > > 2009-11-12 15:50:24,094 INFO [STDOUT] - 1. Get data - > 2009-11-12 15:56

RE: A question about mod_jk 1.2.28 configuration

2009-11-12 Thread thomas2004
: http://old.nabble.com/A-question-about-mod_jk-1.2.28-configuration-tp26264069p26320475.html Sent from the Tomcat - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@tomcat.apache.org For

RE: A question about mod_jk 1.2.28 configuration

2009-11-12 Thread thomas2004
est.civ-versicherung.de 351.425973 [Thu Nov 12 15:56:15 2009] [9287:2537062720] [debug] jk_handler::mod_jk.c (2599): Service finished with status=200 for worker=worker_portfolio_son1 [/code] -- View this message in context: http://old.nabble.com/A-question-about-mod_jk-1.2.28-configuration-tp262

RE: A question about mod_jk 1.2.28 configuration

2009-11-12 Thread Caldarale, Charles R
> From: thomas2004 [mailto:thomas200...@yahoo.de] > Subject: Re: A question about mod_jk 1.2.28 configuration > > Where is 'Bugzilla'? Try the link from the Tomcat home page, cleverly hidden under the name "Bug Database". - Chuck THIS COMMUNICATION MAY CONTA

Re: A question about mod_jk 1.2.28 configuration

2009-11-12 Thread thomas2004
> Thomas can open an issue in Bugzilla, which helps us not forgetting it. > Topic: "Socker read returns EAGAIN during long wait". > > Regards, > > Rainer > > Where is 'Bugzilla'? -- View this message in context: http://old.nabble.com/

Re: A question about mod_jk 1.2.28 configuration

2009-11-11 Thread Rainer Jung
On 11.11.2009 22:53, Christopher Schultz wrote: > Thomas, > > On 11/11/2009 9:45 AM, thomas2004 wrote: > >>> 20-40 minutes is an unreasonable amount of time to wait for an HTTP request >> to complete. I recommend changing your architecture so that HTTP requests >> don't have to take so long. > >

Re: A question about mod_jk 1.2.28 configuration

2009-11-11 Thread Christopher Schultz
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Thomas, On 11/11/2009 9:45 AM, thomas2004 wrote: > >> 20-40 minutes is an unreasonable amount of time to wait for an HTTP request > to complete. I recommend changing your architecture so that HTTP requests > don't have to take so long. > > Surely is

Re: A question about mod_jk 1.2.28 configuration

2009-11-11 Thread thomas2004
> Without socket_timeout the log message looks as follow: [code] [Wed Nov 11 14:25:13 2009] [1976:2537062720] [info] ajp_handle_cping_cpong::jk_ajp_common.c Please ignog my post. The log message is wrong. -- View this message in context: http://old.nabble.com/A-question-about-mod_jk-1.2

Re: A question about mod_jk 1.2.28 configuration

2009-11-11 Thread thomas2004
want to change their program. They said it works by mod_jk 1.2.26, why not by 1.2.28? I am not able to give them a satisfied answer. -- View this message in context: http://old.nabble.com/A-question-about-mod_jk-1.2.28-configuration-tp26264069p26302415.html Sent from the Tomcat - User mailing list

Re: A question about mod_jk 1.2.28 configuration

2009-11-11 Thread thomas2004
worker JkMount /myWeb/* worker_portfolio_son1 -- View this message in context: http://old.nabble.com/A-question-about-mod_jk-1.2.28-configuration-tp26264069p26302185.html Sent from the Tomcat - User mailing list archive at Nabb

Re: A question about mod_jk 1.2.28 configuration

2009-11-10 Thread Christopher Schultz
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Rainer, On 11/10/2009 11:26 AM, Rainer Jung wrote: > It's possible, that this would work as a workaround. The usual "let some > bits dripple to keep the connection active" strategy. Ugh. Why not have the request fire-off a report-generation thread th

Re: A question about mod_jk 1.2.28 configuration

2009-11-10 Thread Christopher Schultz
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Thomas, On 11/10/2009 2:53 AM, thomas2004 wrote: >> Just to confirm: you have a single request that takes 20-40 minutes to >> fulfill? Or do you issue a request to generate the report and then, >> later, issue a request to retrieve the (already-genera

Re: A question about mod_jk 1.2.28 configuration

2009-11-10 Thread Rainer Jung
On 10.11.2009 17:12, André Warnier wrote: > Rainer Jung wrote: >> On 10.11.2009 14:26, thomas2004 wrote: Remove the socket_timeout. Please let us know, whether that helped. >>> I've moved the socket_timeout and the reply_timeout two days ago but it >>> doesn't help. >> > ... > Hi. > Just my To

Re: A question about mod_jk 1.2.28 configuration

2009-11-10 Thread André Warnier
Rainer Jung wrote: On 10.11.2009 14:26, thomas2004 wrote: Remove the socket_timeout. Please let us know, whether that helped. I've moved the socket_timeout and the reply_timeout two days ago but it doesn't help. ... Hi. Just my Tomcat- and Java-dummy look on this. As I understand the basic i

Re: A question about mod_jk 1.2.28 configuration

2009-11-10 Thread Rainer Jung
On 10.11.2009 14:26, thomas2004 wrote: > >> Remove the socket_timeout. Please let us know, whether that helped. > > I've moved the socket_timeout and the reply_timeout two days ago but it > doesn't help. > My workersproperties looks now as follow: > > [code] > worker.worker_portfolio_son1.conne

Re: A question about mod_jk 1.2.28 configuration

2009-11-10 Thread thomas2004
//tomcat.apache.org/connectors-doc/generic_howto/timeouts.html I will try this later and tell you the result. Btw, is there any difference between mod_jk 1.2.26 and 1.2.28. I wonder why it works by 1.2.26 but not by 1.2.28. Regards Thomas -- View this message in context: http://old.nabble.com/A-qu

Re: A question about mod_jk 1.2.28 configuration

2009-11-10 Thread Rainer Jung
On 09.11.2009 11:27, thomas2004 wrote: > > I newly installed the mod_jk 1.2.28 and since then got problem (see below). > > ** > We have a web application deployed on Jboss (RH Linux OS). The access to the > web application is via a Apache Httpd Web Server. One of the function

Re: A question about mod_jk 1.2.28 configuration

2009-11-09 Thread thomas2004
do with cache. But I don't know where and which one. -- View this message in context: http://old.nabble.com/A-question-about-mod_jk-1.2.28-configuration-tp26264069p26279572.html Sent from the Tomcat - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com. --

Re: A question about mod_jk 1.2.28 configuration

2009-11-09 Thread Christopher Schultz
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Thomas, On 11/9/2009 5:27 AM, thomas2004 wrote: > We have a web application deployed on Jboss (RH Linux OS). The access to the > web application is via a Apache Httpd Web Server. One of the function of > this web application is one can online generate

A question about mod_jk 1.2.28 configuration

2009-11-09 Thread thomas2004
this message in context: http://old.nabble.com/A-question-about-mod_jk-1.2.28-configuration-tp26264069p26264069.html Sent from the Tomcat - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr..