AW: Configuration question for 2500 simultaneous users.

2013-08-05 Thread Stadelmann Josef
ist Betreff: Re: Configuration question for 2500 simultaneous users. On 7/30/2013 1:17 PM, Tomcat Random wrote: > Thanks Mark, I will give it a close read. > > As far as profiling, are you using any tools that are worth mentioning? > Nothing outstanding, since currently all of

Re: Configuration question for 2500 simultaneous users.

2013-08-02 Thread Christopher Schultz
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 Alec, On 8/1/13 6:08 PM, Tomcat Random wrote: > Thanks Mark, I've been getting up to speed on JMeter. I've used > selenium before. "The particulars depend on your particular > application" - agreed. That part I can work out myself by looking > at bo

Re: Configuration question for 2500 simultaneous users.

2013-08-02 Thread Christopher Schultz
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 Alec, On 8/1/13 6:14 PM, Tomcat Random wrote: > I'm expecting 5000 simultaneous users, with a physical load > balancer to two physical app servers. So ~2500 per machine, each > running an instance of tomcat not fronted by httpd or any proxy > server

Re: Configuration question for 2500 simultaneous users.

2013-08-01 Thread Tomcat Random
Hey Chris, I'm expecting 5000 simultaneous users, with a physical load balancer to two physical app servers. So ~2500 per machine, each running an instance of tomcat not fronted by httpd or any proxy server. (i.e., using Tomcat to serve a few static assets along with the webapp). "are you just in

Re: Configuration question for 2500 simultaneous users.

2013-08-01 Thread Tomcat Random
Thanks Mark, I've been getting up to speed on JMeter. I've used selenium before. "The particulars depend on your particular application" - agreed. That part I can work out myself by looking at bottlenecks, generally timing areas of the application with more and more granularity, in places where the

Re: Configuration question for 2500 simultaneous users.

2013-07-31 Thread Christopher Schultz
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 Alec, On 7/30/13 3:42 PM, Tomcat Random wrote: > The project I'm working on has 5000 simultaneous users average. I > have two physical servers both running an instance of Tomcat 7.0. > They're behind a physical load balancer with sticky, least > con

Re: Configuration question for 2500 simultaneous users.

2013-07-30 Thread Mark Eggers
On 7/30/2013 1:17 PM, Tomcat Random wrote: Thanks Mark, I will give it a close read. As far as profiling, are you using any tools that are worth mentioning? Nothing outstanding, since currently all of our applications are pretty lightweight. That may change if we redo the architecture. JMe

Re: Configuration question for 2500 simultaneous users.

2013-07-30 Thread Tomcat Random
Thanks Mark, I will give it a close read. As far as profiling, are you using any tools that are worth mentioning? Best, A On Tue, Jul 30, 2013 at 4:02 PM, Mark Eggers wrote: > On 7/30/2013 12:42 PM, Tomcat Random wrote: > >> The project I'm working on has 5000 simultaneous users average. I h

Re: Configuration question for 2500 simultaneous users.

2013-07-30 Thread Mark Eggers
On 7/30/2013 12:42 PM, Tomcat Random wrote: The project I'm working on has 5000 simultaneous users average. I have two physical servers both running an instance of Tomcat 7.0. They're behind a physical load balancer with sticky, least connections balancing. Nothing in front of the Tomcats. Port 8

Configuration question for 2500 simultaneous users.

2013-07-30 Thread Tomcat Random
The project I'm working on has 5000 simultaneous users average. I have two physical servers both running an instance of Tomcat 7.0. They're behind a physical load balancer with sticky, least connections balancing. Nothing in front of the Tomcats. Port 80 to is routed to them by iptables. Anyone ou