> -Original Message-
> From: Christopher Schultz [mailto:ch...@christopherschultz.net]
> Sent: Wednesday, January 05, 2011 10:21 AM
> To: Tomcat Users List
> Subject: Re: httpd/Tomcat load balancing question
>
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
&g
On 1/5/11 4:21 PM, Christopher Schultz wrote:
>> In this case, only gain.
> I see some opportunities for loss: see above.
:)
p
0x62590808.asc
Description: application/pgp-keys
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Pid,
Late to the thread. :(
On 12/23/2010 5:37 AM, Pid wrote:
> On 23/12/2010 07:49, André Warnier wrote:
>> So in clear everyday English, for the benefit of the oppressed minority
>> who does not speak JSTL fluently, the fact of encoding this link i
55 PM
> To: Tomcat Users List
> Subject: RE: httpd/Tomcat load balancing question
>
> > From: Jeffrey Janner [mailto:jeffrey.jan...@polydyne.com]
> > Subject: RE: httpd/Tomcat load balancing question
>
> >
> > default
> > /static/*
&
> From: Jeffrey Janner [mailto:jeffrey.jan...@polydyne.com]
> Subject: RE: httpd/Tomcat load balancing question
>
> default
> /static/*
>
> This is supposed to send anything that comes in as /static/ to the
> default servlet for Tomcat to
ing?
Jeff
> -Original Message-
> From: André Warnier [mailto:a...@ice-sa.com]
> Sent: Thursday, December 23, 2010 7:15 AM
> To: Tomcat Users List
> Subject: Re: httpd/Tomcat load balancing question
>
> I'll top post and reply to an earlier message at the same time,
> -Original Message-
> From: Konstantin Kolinko [mailto:knst.koli...@gmail.com]
> Sent: Thursday, December 23, 2010 5:07 AM
> To: Tomcat Users List
> Subject: Re: httpd/Tomcat load balancing question
>
> 2010/12/23 Pid :
> > On 23/12/2010 07:49, André Warn
the
URL?
Jeff
-Original Message-
From: Jeffrey Janner [mailto:jeffrey.jan...@polydyne.com]
Sent: Wednesday, December 22, 2010 4:50 PM
To: 'Tomcat Users List'
Subject: RE: httpd/Tomcat load balancing question
In the specific case I mention below, this is the source from the js
2010/12/23 Pid :
> On 23/12/2010 07:49, André Warnier wrote:
>> Pid * wrote:
>>> On 22 Dec 2010, at 23:38, André Warnier wrote:
>>>
Pid * wrote:
> On 22 Dec 2010, at 23:02, Jeffrey Janner
> wrote:
>> Definitely the culprit. Now, I just have to convince the Dev team
>> that t
On 23/12/2010 07:49, André Warnier wrote:
> Pid * wrote:
>> On 22 Dec 2010, at 23:38, André Warnier wrote:
>>
>>> Pid * wrote:
On 22 Dec 2010, at 23:02, Jeffrey Janner
wrote:
> Definitely the culprit. Now, I just have to convince the Dev team
> that they are, once again, a bunc
On 23.12.2010 00:08, Pid * wrote:
On 22 Dec 2010, at 23:02, Jeffrey Janner wrote:
Definitely the culprit. Now, I just have to convince the Dev team that they
are, once again, a bunch of idiots.
Fail.
I'm sure it's some framework/tool they are using. The question now is, if I
can't get
Pid * wrote:
On 22 Dec 2010, at 23:38, André Warnier wrote:
Pid * wrote:
On 22 Dec 2010, at 23:02, Jeffrey Janner wrote:
Definitely the culprit. Now, I just have to convince the Dev team that they
are, once again, a bunch of idiots.
Fail.
Pid,
why /do/ the "static objects" links embedde
On 22 Dec 2010, at 23:38, André Warnier wrote:
> Pid * wrote:
>> On 22 Dec 2010, at 23:02, Jeffrey Janner wrote:
>>> Definitely the culprit. Now, I just have to convince the Dev team that
>>> they are, once again, a bunch of idiots.
>> Fail.
> Pid,
> why /do/ the "static objects" links embedde
Pid * wrote:
On 22 Dec 2010, at 23:02, Jeffrey Janner wrote:
Definitely the culprit. Now, I just have to convince the Dev team that they
are, once again, a bunch of idiots.
Fail.
Pid,
why /do/ the "static objects" links embedded in the login page get back to the browser
with a jsessioni
f
>
>> -Original Message-
>> From: Jeffrey Janner [mailto:jeffrey.jan...@polydyne.com]
>> Sent: Wednesday, December 22, 2010 4:50 PM
>> To: 'Tomcat Users List'
>> Subject: RE: httpd/Tomcat load balancing question
>>
>> In the specific case
2, 2010 4:50 PM
> To: 'Tomcat Users List'
> Subject: RE: httpd/Tomcat load balancing question
>
> In the specific case I mention below, this is the source from the jsp:
> " />
>
> I'm not a jsp programmer, but I'm betting it has something to d
; Sent: Wednesday, December 22, 2010 4:40 PM
> To: 'Tomcat Users List'; 'Tomcat Users List'
> Subject: RE: httpd/Tomcat load balancing question
>
> Thanks, that was what I was thinking.
> Since the only JSP I have access to is the welcome-file, I'm not sur
Addendum.
You could also write the links as
(without leading "/"). That would keep them relative to the current app, and cause less
work if you ever want to call the application other than "Portal".
You could also put the static elements in your app under Tomcat.
Unless there are lots of the
22, 2010 2:43 PM
> To: Tomcat Users List
> Subject: Re: httpd/Tomcat load balancing question
>
> Hi.
>
> Not knowing anything about JSP per se, I would nevertheless guess that
> the links are
> written using something like
> or similarly, instead
> of just plain html
&g
Hi.
Not knowing anything about JSP per se, I would nevertheless guess that the links are
written using something like
or similarly, instead of just plain html
.
That probably leads the JSP compiler to think it has to "relativise" the links to the app
context and so on, while in this case it s
Httpd 2.2.17
Tomcat 6.0.29
Sun JDK 1.6.0_22
Spring Framework (3.0.2 I think)
All on Windows
The Dev team is creating a new app that we are planning to deploy using httpd
as a load-balancer to two Tomcats on separate servers. Httpd is configured to
serve static files - graphics, css, etc. - with
Thanks for your two cents Luca, they are a pretty smart idea on how to
load balance thing in a expert way, however this is not a reality when
you work for a company that a thinking line as "do more with less", they
wont give me an extra nic for load balancing neither a third server...
my constr
hi,
This seems the correct way to do. The best way to do it is to use a balanced
ip.
In my setup I use the same http.conf and workers file on both of the server.
When one tomcat goes down the apache sends all the rest of the queries to
second node. When the apache goes down the load balancer, in
Thats the way my mod_proxy conf is right now
BalancerMember http://servera:8080/agent/ route=worker0 keepalive=On
loadfactor=1
BalancerMember http://serverb:8080/agent/ route=worker1 keepalive=On
loadfactor=1
ProxySet lbmethod=byrequests maxattempts=3
stickysession=JSESSIONID|jsessio
On Fri, 2010-08-27 at 09:17 -0300, Thiago Locatelli da Silva wrote:
> Hello list! :)
>
> Here at work I was asked to give a try on load balancing two tomcat
> servers running tomcat 6.0.29. The problem is that I was given only two
> servers to do this, what gave me only one option: run the apach
On 27.08.2010 19:22, Thiago Locatelli da Silva wrote:
Hi Rainer,
I followed your suggestions and it seems to be working, the load
balacing, now i need to look into why my application, created with gwt +
comet is not working. It seems that comet stopped working.
Any information about what the s
Hi Rainer,
I followed your suggestions and it seems to be working, the load
balacing, now i need to look into why my application, created with gwt +
comet is not working. It seems that comet stopped working.
Thanks
T
Rainer Jung escreveu:
On 27.08.2010 14:17, Thiago Locatelli da Silva wrot
My apache version is 2.2.3 as follow.
[r...@servera ~]$ httpd -version
Server version: Apache/2.2.3
Server built: Nov 10 2007 12:44:08
I will take a look at your suggestions and give a try. I will be further
posting my finding on this thread.
Thanks a lot Rainer
T
Rainer Jung escreveu:
O
On 27.08.2010 14:17, Thiago Locatelli da Silva wrote:
Hello list! :)
Here at work I was asked to give a try on load balancing two tomcat
servers running tomcat 6.0.29. The problem is that I was given only two
servers to do this, what gave me only one option: run the apache in one
of these server
Hello list! :)
Here at work I was asked to give a try on load balancing two tomcat
servers running tomcat 6.0.29. The problem is that I was given only two
servers to do this, what gave me only one option: run the apache in one
of these servers. So I decided to put the apache httpd server which
Hi
Implemented the changes... Still getting the same problem
>>For Load balancing ,when 1st Tomcat is shutdown, The Session is not
transfered to the 2nd Tomcat.
Any more ideas ?
with regards
Karthik
Filip Hanik - Dev Lists wrote:
see corrections inline
karthikn wrote:
Hi
Can some
see corrections inline
karthikn wrote:
Hi
Can some body suggest me any thin missing in here...
I have 2 independent Tomcats clustered
The Apache Configurations is as given
httpd.conf
-
LoadModule jk_module modules/mod_jk.so
JkWorkersFile con
> From: karthikn [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Can some body suggest me any thin missing in here...
[lots of text missing]
Please describe the problem you have, that leads you to think something might
be missing. Without that, we're guessing.
- Peter
Hi
Can some body suggest me any thin missing in here...
I have 2 independent Tomcats clustered
The Apache Configurations is as given
httpd.conf
-
LoadModule jk_module modules/mod_jk.so
JkWorkersFile conf/workers.properties
JkLogFile lo
Hi,
first of all I assume you are using version 1.2.18 of mod_jk? Otherwise
please update.
Sharma, Siddharth schrieb:
> We have a 12 (tomcat 5.5.16) instance cluster on 4 physical machines running
> redhat linux. There is an Apache installed on each machine (4 mod_jks). Each
> mod_jk's worker.pro
We have a 12 (tomcat 5.5.16) instance cluster on 4 physical machines running
redhat linux. There is an Apache installed on each machine (4 mod_jks). Each
mod_jk's worker.properties is configured exactly the same way i.e. each
mod-jk load-balances across all 12 tomcat instances. All instances have t
36 matches
Mail list logo
