Re: Mod_jk load balacing algorithm

2006-08-08 Thread Rainer Jung
Mohan2005 wrote: On the 'P' option which was recommended by Mladen Turk some time ago when we had issues (share memory locking) with a older version of mod_jk ( <1.2.15), we have left it as it is. There definitely were issues concerning optimistic locking around 1.2.15, but we expect them to b

Re: Mod_jk load balacing algorithm

2006-08-08 Thread Mohan2005
t is. But if you recommend that 'O' locking gives better performance on new mod_jk versions we will be looking into changing it after testing under our applications. Thanks -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/Mod_jk-load-balacing-algorithm-tf2064844.html#a57018

Re: Mod_jk load balacing algorithm

2006-08-08 Thread Rainer Jung
Hi, Mohan2005 schrieb: > Hello > > Thaks. We will enable loggin to find this, but since its a production setup > will it affect performance ? The numbers suggest, that you've got 210.000 * 12(instances) / 21 (days) = 120.000 requests/day So depending on the time distribution, this should boild

Re: Mod_jk load balacing algorithm

2006-08-07 Thread Mohan2005
, server4_2, server1_3, server2_3, server3_3, server4_3 worker.loadbalancer.lock=P worker.loadbalancer.method=B worker.loadbalancer.local_worker_only=1 -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/Mod_jk-load-balacing-algorithm-tf2064844.html#a5700083 Sent from the Tomcat - User forum

Re: Mod_jk load balacing algorithm

2006-08-07 Thread Rainer Jung
Hi, Mohan Wickramasinghe schrieb: > Hello > > We are using the "new" Busyness method with 1.2.18 > We have also using 'sticky sessions'. > > Clarification on > "> As soon as there will be real load, behaviour will differ." > > We have 9 nodes on 3 identitical servers with identical settings, lb

Re: Mod_jk load balacing algorithm

2006-08-07 Thread Mohan Wickramasinghe
Hello We are using the "new" Busyness method with 1.2.18 We have also using 'sticky sessions'. Clarification on "> As soon as there will be real load, behaviour will differ." We have 9 nodes on 3 identitical servers with identical settings, lb factor equal on all nodes, but we see one node which

RE: Mod_jk load balacing algorithm

2006-08-07 Thread Sharma, Siddharth
Subject: Re: Mod_jk load balacing algorithm mod_jk neither supports round-robin, nor random load-balancing. Currently you can choose between three algorithms: method=B (busyness): choose the worker with the lowwest number of requests currently in processing. method=R (requests): choose the worker

Re: Mod_jk load balacing algorithm

2006-08-07 Thread Rainer Jung
mod_jk neither supports round-robin, nor random load-balancing. Currently you can choose between three algorithms: method=B (busyness): choose the worker with the lowwest number of requests currently in processing. method=R (requests): choose the worker that did the lowest number of requests

Mod_jk load balacing algorithm

2006-08-07 Thread Sharma, Siddharth
Is it possible to change mod_jk's load-balacing algorithm to random (from round robin)? If yes, how? TIA Sidd - To start a new topic, e-mail: users@tomcat.apache.org To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional comma