Hi,
Ok, so to conclude this is not possible at the moment.
Thanks for the input and clarifications as well as the suggested ways to
work :)
br
/Linus
On 29 September 2015 at 00:16, Christopher Schultz <
ch...@christopherschultz.net> wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA256
>
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Linus,
On 9/28/15 2:37 AM, Linus Brimstedt wrote:
> On 27 September 2015 at 23:55, Christopher Schultz <
> ch...@christopherschultz.net> wrote:
>
>>
>> You have competing requirements:
>>
>> 1. All servers are the same
>>
> 2. Some subset users
>> You have competing requirements:
>>
>> 1. All servers are the same
>>
>2. Some subset users get a different version of the application
>>
>
>All servers would have all versions of the app, thats the whole point
>:)
>I.e.
>Instead of
>Server 1 - 3: App Version 001
>Server 4 - 6: App Version 0
Hello,
On 27 September 2015 at 23:55, Christopher Schultz <
ch...@christopherschultz.net> wrote:
>
> You have competing requirements:
>
> 1. All servers are the same
>
2. Some subset users get a different version of the application
>
All servers would have all versions of the app, thats the w
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Linus,
On 9/27/15 2:41 PM, Linus Brimstedt wrote:
> On 24 September 2015 at 23:59, George Sexton
> wrote:
>
> Tomcat. Other suggestions are welcome.
>>
>> Couldn't you have your load balancer send x% to one instance, and
>> 1-x% to the other inst
On 24 September 2015 at 23:59, George Sexton wrote:
Tomcat. Other suggestions are welcome.
>
> Couldn't you have your load balancer send x% to one instance, and 1-x% to
> the other instance? Why would Tomcat even have to be aware of this?
>
>
Hi
Sure I could. But I like all my servers to be ide
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
George,
On 9/24/15 5:59 PM, George Sexton wrote:
> On 9/24/2015 4:35 AM, Linus Brimstedt wrote:
>> Hello,
>>
>> Opening an old thread here regarding controlling which version of
>> a web app a request ends up at in a parallell deployment
>> scenari
On 9/24/2015 4:27 PM, André Warnier (tomcat) wrote:
On 24.09.2015 23:59, George Sexton wrote:
...
Couldn't you have your load balancer send x% to one instance, and
1-x% to the other
instance?
Wait, I didn't get this.
Say that x = 20.
So we send 20% to instance A.
Then we send (1 - 20)% =
On 24.09.2015 23:59, George Sexton wrote:
...
Couldn't you have your load balancer send x% to one instance, and 1-x% to the
other
instance?
Wait, I didn't get this.
Say that x = 20.
So we send 20% to instance A.
Then we send (1 - 20)% = -19%, to instance B.
So together, instance A and instan
On 9/24/2015 4:35 AM, Linus Brimstedt wrote:
Hello,
Opening an old thread here regarding controlling which version of a web app
a request ends up at in a parallell deployment scenario.
My use case:
I would like to use parallel deployments for A/B testing.
I.e, deploy new version.
Send x% of
Hello,
Opening an old thread here regarding controlling which version of a web app
a request ends up at in a parallell deployment scenario.
My use case:
I would like to use parallel deployments for A/B testing.
I.e, deploy new version.
Send x% of visitors to the new version, the rest to the old
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Chris,
On 7/21/15 1:30 PM, chris derham wrote:
>>> BTW: The reason I'm asking is because that transparent shift
>>> from one app release to the next doesn't play along well with
>>> any caches (browser, caching proxies, CDNs etc.): When a shift
>>>
>> BTW: The reason I'm asking is because that transparent shift from
>> one app release to the next doesn't play along well with any caches
>> (browser, caching proxies, CDNs etc.): When a shift to the next app
>> release occurs, I generally need the client browsers to fetch a
>> fresh copy of all
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Chris,
On 7/21/15 11:07 AM, Chris Gamache wrote:
> +1 here. This would be nice to have a standard way to manage
> different logical versions of the same webapp to handle
> split-braining client and server code. That's my million dollar
> problem.
+1 here. This would be nice to have a standard way to manage different logical
versions of the same webapp to handle split-braining client and server code.
That's my million dollar problem.
So, the idea floated by this fine group of list participants was to deploy and
use cookies that a revers
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Hartmut,
On 7/19/15 2:49 PM, Hartmut Honisch wrote:
> Hi everyone,
>
> I'm using Tomcat's parallel deployment feature, and I wonder
> whether there's a way to request a specific version of my webapp.
>
> Let's say I have a WAR named myapp##001.war
2015-07-19 22:49 GMT+03:00 Hartmut Honisch :
> Hi everyone,
>
> I'm using Tomcat's parallel deployment feature, and I wonder whether
> there's a way to request a specific version of my webapp.
>
> Let's say I have a WAR named myapp##001.war deployed on my server and just
> deployed a new WAR myapp#
Hi everyone,
I'm using Tomcat's parallel deployment feature, and I wonder whether
there's a way to request a specific version of my webapp.
Let's say I have a WAR named myapp##001.war deployed on my server and just
deployed a new WAR myapp##002.war.
Requests to http:/myserver/myapp/.. are transpa
18 matches
Mail list logo
