Re: Java databases as alternative to MySQL on OS X Server? (OT)

Mieke Banderas wrote: Mike Sabroff suggested: Cloudscape is it faster than Apache Derby in your experience? - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] The IBM

Re: Java databases as alternative to MySQL on OS X Server? (OT)

Mike Sabroff suggested: >Cloudscape is it faster than Apache Derby in your experience? - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: Java databases as alternative to MySQL on OS X Server? (OT)

Cloudscape, now owned by IBM is a good choice. It can be run as a Standalone server or as an imbedded db running within the JVM with your code. I haven't used it lately, but developed some stuff a few years ago when Sun use to ship it with the J2EE package. Richard Schilling wrote: You might

Re: Java databases as alternative to MySQL on OS X Server? (OT)

You might try a Java Data Objects implementation: www.objectdb.com java.sun.com/products/jdo/index.jsp These are pure object databases, and are reasonably fast. The Sun's reference implementation of JDO is not intended for production use but it's great as a development toolkit. Richard Sch

RE: Java databases as alternative to MySQL on OS X Server? (OT)

> From: Oded Arbel [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Re: Java databases as alternative to MySQL on OS X > Server? (OT) > > Please read up on your Java memory model. What you describe > is a nice abstraction that many Java developers have in their > mind, but is techni

Re: Java databases as alternative to MySQL on OS X Server? (OT)

On Tuesday, 29 בNovember 2005 17:28, Caldarale, Charles R wrote: > > From: Oded Arbel [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Subject: Re: Java databases as alternative to MySQL on OS X > > Server? (OT) > > > > inter-thread communication in java is done through shared > >

RE: Java databases as alternative to MySQL on OS X Server? (OT)

> From: Oded Arbel [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Re: Java databases as alternative to MySQL on OS X > Server? (OT) > > inter-thread communication in java is done through shared > memory - shared variables, but the Java memory sharing model > doesn't really sha

Re: Java databases as alternative to MySQL on OS X Server? (OT)

On Tuesday, 29 בNovember 2005 05:12, Mieke Banderas wrote: > I wonder how much faster Linux could run on my G3 server hardware. I > would have lots of work replacing all the built in services in Mac OS > X Server to give me all that control also in Linux, buy maybe I have > to. I'm a bit cashstrapp

Re: Java databases as alternative to MySQL on OS X Server? (OT)

On Tuesday, 29 בNovember 2005 03:21, Mieke Banderas wrote: > Oded Arbel said: > >b) Even assuming they are right, you still want to choose MySQL over > > JVM space databases, because Java and Java databases are very much > > thread enabled and create and destroy many threads. > > But do they do it

RE: Java databases as alternative to MySQL on OS X Server? (OT)

> From: Mieke Banderas [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Re: Java databases as alternative to MySQL on OS X > Server? (OT) > > It would seem so, as I now learnt that The HotSpot JVM > uses native threads. The only possible escape then would > be to use another JVM that

Re: Java databases as alternative to MySQL on OS X Server? (OT)

Mieke Banderas said: >I'd like to know >where/how exactly Java threads are started/killed on Hotspot in OS X. >Doesn't java threads mainly intercommunicate within the JVM? Context >switches? >Is it really a completely dead end that minimizing the OS threading in >Mac OS X and keeping threads with

Re: Java databases as alternative to MySQL on OS X Server? (OT)

Oded Arbel said: >b) Even assuming they are right, you still want to choose MySQL over JVM >space databases, because Java and Java databases are very much thread >enabled and create and destroy many threads. But do they do it mainly within the OS or within the JVM? Top or PS doesn't show indivi

Re: Java databases as alternative to MySQL on OS X Server? (OT)

On Monday, 28 בNovember 2005 19:59, Mieke Banderas wrote: > Given the sad, sad performance findings at: > "No More Apple Mysteries, Part Two" > Date: September 1st, 2005 > > I don't enough of JVMs to know if Javabased DBs are usually better > perf

Re: Java databases as alternative to MySQL on OS X Server? (OT)

On Monday, 28 בNovember 2005 19:59, Mieke Banderas wrote: > are there any javabased DB alternatives, that may perform better than > MySQL (or PostgreSQL for that matter)? I prefer free, open sourced > DBs or otherwise with a license that could fit a small business/non > profit organisation. HSQLdb