Christopher Schultz wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Filip,
Filip Hanik - Dev Lists wrote:
Mentioning WatchedResource is a red herring.
reloadable attribute -> nothing to do with reloadable apps
I disagree:
"relodable ( attribute)
Set to true if you want
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Filip,
Filip Hanik - Dev Lists wrote:
>> Mentioning WatchedResource is a red herring.
>
> reloadable attribute -> nothing to do with reloadable apps
I disagree:
"relodable ( attribute)
Set to true if you want Catalina to monitor classes in /WEB-INF
PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, August 24, 2007 2:39 PM
To: Tomcat Users List
Subject: Re: Tomcat6, apache2, mod_jk, non-APR, windows 2000, slow server
startup with unpacked WAR
Dan Beaulieu wrote:
Well I guess this gets into the nuances of classloaders that I am
completely
unfamiliar with, but
TECTED]
> Sent: Friday, August 24, 2007 10:42 AM
> To: Tomcat Users List
> Subject: Re: Tomcat6, apache2, mod_jk, non-APR, windows 2000, slow server
> startup with unpacked WAR
>
> Dan Beaulieu wrote:
>
>> Right, I understand the function of the reloadable attribute.
Filip
Not to mention, it doesn't really make sense when using an unpackable war.
-Original Message-
From: Filip Hanik - Dev Lists [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, August 23, 2007 5:25 PM
To: Tomcat Users List
Subject: Re: Tomcat6, apache2, mod_jk, non-APR, windows 2000
ip
> Not to mention, it doesn't really make sense when using an unpackable war.
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Filip Hanik - Dev Lists [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Thursday, August 23, 2007 5:25 PM
> To: Tomcat Users List
> Subject: Re: Tomcat6, apache2, mod_jk
riginal Message-
From: Filip Hanik - Dev Lists [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, August 23, 2007 5:25 PM
To: Tomcat Users List
Subject: Re: Tomcat6, apache2, mod_jk, non-APR, windows 2000, slow server
startup with unpacked WAR
even then, you should set reloadable="false"
th
]
Sent: Friday, August 24, 2007 10:26 AM
To: 'Tomcat Users List'
Subject: RE: Tomcat6, apache2, mod_jk, non-APR, windows 2000, slow server
startup with unpacked WAR
Right, I understand the function of the reloadable attribute. What I don't
understand is how on a modern computer, r
n
> subsequent start ups with out deleting the webapp dir are fast.
>
> Agreed, reloadable shouldn't have that much of an impact.
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Len Popp [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Thursday, August 23, 2007 2:43 PM
> To: Tomcat Users List
le shouldn't have that much of an impact.
-Original Message-
From: Len Popp [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, August 23, 2007 2:43 PM
To: Tomcat Users List
Subject: Re: Tomcat6, apache2, mod_jk, non-APR, windows 2000, slow server
startup with unpacked WAR
Is it unpacking the wa
lto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, August 23, 2007 2:43 PM
To: Tomcat Users List
Subject: Re: Tomcat6, apache2, mod_jk, non-APR, windows 2000, slow server
startup with unpacked WAR
Is it unpacking the war during startup? Unzipping 2000 files takes a
while (even if they're small).
--
Len
Is it unpacking the war during startup? Unzipping 2000 files takes a
while (even if they're small).
--
Len
On 8/23/07, Dan Beaulieu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Sorry to reply to my own post, but I have sort of figured it out. There were
> about 2000 classes in /WEB-INF/classes, only one servlet
if you have reloadable="true" (and maybe even if it is not set, not
sure) Tomcat adds files to a list for monitoring the timestamp of them
changing. Hence many classes will add to more stuff to add to the list
and monitor
but that doesn't seem like it should take 80sec anyway
Filip
Dan Beaul
Sorry to reply to my own post, but I have sort of figured it out. There were
about 2000 classes in /WEB-INF/classes, only one servlet though. Instead of
making the war from here, we only have the servlet class in WEB-INF/classes
and jar up the rest of the packages and place that jar into WEB-INF/li
14 matches
Mail list logo
