-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Daniel,
On 5/9/20 12:34, daniel@dell.com wrote:
> We want to use APR to call openssl also do with native to support
FIPS mode in tomcat.
>
> Software info Tomcat/9.0.34 libtcnative-1-0-1.2.23-15.30.x86_64
Where did you get that? Is it tcnative-
java.base/java.lang.Thread.run(Thread.java:834)
BRs
Dan
-Original Message-
From: Christopher Schultz
Sent: Friday, May 8, 2020 10:37 PM
To: users@tomcat.apache.org
Subject: Re: APR connector questions
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Daniel,
On 5/8/20 04:25, daniel
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Daniel,
On 5/8/20 04:25, daniel@dell.com wrote:
> We are changing from Nio connector to APR connector to enable FIPS
> mode in tomcat. But we hit tomcat hang issue, ssl handshake no
> response when run long time. So many close_wait in netstat ou
Dear experts:
Nowadays, we are changing from Nio connector to APR connector to enable FIPS
mode in tomcat.
But we hit tomcat hang issue, ssl handshake no response when run long time.
So many close_wait in netstat output.
Do you have any advises about that issue?
BRs
Dan
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
John,
On 9/10/19 14:20, John Beaulaurier -X (jbeaulau - ADVANCED NETWORK
INFORMATION INC at Cisco) wrote:
> I needed to build the APR libs from source as there was no rpm in
> yum, but the default directory where the libs were place was not
> in th
-Original Message-
From: Christopher Schultz
Sent: Friday, September 6, 2019 2:37 PM
To: users@tomcat.apache.org
Subject: Re: APR libs present but not found
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
John,
On 9/6/19 16:51, John Beaulaurier -X (jbeaulau - ADVANCED NETWORK INFORMATION
INC at
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
John,
On 9/6/19 16:51, John Beaulaurier -X (jbeaulau - ADVANCED NETWORK
INFORMATION INC at Cisco) wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I installed the following RPMs via Yum for OpenSSL support
>
> RHEL 7.4 apr.i686
> 1.4.8-3.el7_4.1 apr.x86_64
> 1.4.8-3.el7_4.1 a
On 04/02/2019 09:37, M. Manna wrote:
> Hello,
>
> Is it okay to replace 1.2.19 (packed with Tomcat 8.5.37 Windows 64 bit)
> with the newly released version 1.2.21?
Yes.
Mark
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@tomcat.ap
On 25/04/18 13:34, M. Manna wrote:
> I needed to mask out certain information before I could send you the full
> stack trace. Here is the full version:
OK. That looks like a normal ClientAbortException.
This doesn't look like Tomcat's logging. It looks like application
logging. I think you need t
Hi Mark,
Thanks for clarifying. Apologies as I truly meant to say "Client dropped
the connection". So once again, thanks for pointing that out.
I needed to mask out certain information before I could send you the full
stack trace. Here is the full version:
INFO | jvm 1| 2018/04/25 05:37:38
On 25/04/18 11:18, M. Manna wrote:
> Hello,
> But from the above stack track it seems as though the
> socket cannot handle the size of the data being transferred.
That is not correct. What you are seeing is an I/O exception as a result
of the client dropping the connection.
> We did a controll
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Chris,
On 10/31/17 12:18 PM, Cheltenham, Chris wrote:
> I will need some help here.
>
> How do I generate a stack trace?
If you are getting an exception in the log file, I'd expect a stack
trace to accompany it. Something that looks like this:
o
lphia
Work # 215-400-5025
Cell # 215-301-6571
-Original Message-
From: Mark Thomas [mailto:ma...@apache.org]
Sent: Tuesday, October 31, 2017 12:47 PM
To: Tomcat Users List
Subject: Re: apr
On 31/10/17 14:41, Cheltenham, Chris wrote:
> Thanks Mark , but where in the error logs do you
On 31/10/17 14:41, Cheltenham, Chris wrote:
> Thanks Mark , but where in the error logs do you see I am building against
> 1.0.1?
> 31-Oct-2017 10:40:15.250 SEVERE [main]
> org.apache.catalina.core.AprLifecycleListener.lifecycleEvent Failed to
> initialize the SSLEngine.
> org.apache.tomcat.
# 215-301-6571
-Original Message-
From: Christopher Schultz [mailto:ch...@christopherschultz.net]
Sent: Tuesday, October 31, 2017 11:48 AM
To: users@tomcat.apache.org
Subject: Re: apr
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Chris,
On 10/31/17 10:41 AM, Cheltenham, Chris wrote
District of Philadelphia
Work # 215-400-5025
Cell # 215-301-6571
-Original Message-
From: Christopher Schultz [mailto:ch...@christopherschultz.net]
Sent: Tuesday, October 31, 2017 11:48 AM
To: users@tomcat.apache.org
Subject: Re: apr
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Chris,
On
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Chris,
On 10/31/17 10:41 AM, Cheltenham, Chris wrote:
> Thanks Mark , but where in the error logs do you see I am building
> against 1.0.1?
>
> 31-Oct-2017 10:40:15.243 INFO [main]
> org.apache.catalina.core.AprLifecycleListener.lifecycleEvent Loa
;
Chris Cheltenham
Technology Services
The School District of Philadelphia
Work # 215-400-5025
Cell # 215-301-6571
-Original Message-
From: Mark Thomas [mailto:ma...@apache.org]
Sent: Tuesday, October 31, 2017 10:08 AM
To: Tomcat Users List
Subject: Re: apr
On 31/10/17 12:19, Cheltenham
>
> Work # 215-400-5025
> Cell # 215-301-6571
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Mark Thomas [mailto:ma...@apache.org]
> Sent: Tuesday, October 31, 2017 3:24 AM
> To: Tomcat Users List
> Subject: Re: apr
>
> On 30/10/2017 17:49, Cheltenham, Chris wrote:
>&g
to tell
me.
===
Thank You;
Chris Cheltenham
Technology Services
The School District of Philadelphia
Work # 215-400-5025
Cell # 215-301-6571
-Original Message-
From: Mark Thomas [mailto:ma...@apache.org]
Sent: Tuesday, October 31, 2017 3:24 AM
To: Tomcat Users List
Subject: R
On 30/10/2017 17:49, Cheltenham, Chris wrote:
> Hello Everyone,
>
> Using OpenSSL 1.0.2k-fips
>
> I am trying to install the apr.
>
> I used several different versions of APR 1.4 through 1.6
>
> Then I compiled tnative 1.1.16, 1.2.x
The latest release of the 1.1.x line is 1.1.34.
Given 1.2.x
, 2017 3:17 PM
To: users@tomcat.apache.org
Subject: Re: apr
Hi Chris,
Did you recompile APR with FIPS? You must completely compile
tcnative.dll.
Marcus
From: Cheltenham, Chris
Sent: Monday, October 30, 2017 1:49 PM
To: users@tomcat.apache.org
Subject: apr
Hi Chris,
Did you recompile APR with FIPS? You must completely compile tcnative.dll.
Marcus
From: Cheltenham, Chris
Sent: Monday, October 30, 2017 1:49 PM
To: users@tomcat.apache.org
Subject: apr
Hello Everyone,
Using OpenSSL 1.0.2k-fips
I am trying to in
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Anibal,
On 7/22/17 11:30 AM, Anibal Alvarez Alvarez wrote:
> Hi. When I run a .jsp file, in the console I can read < [main] org.apache.catalina.core.AprLifecycleListener.lifecycleEvent
> La biblioteca nativa de Apache Tomcat basada en ARP que permit
On 20/05/2015 18:02, Maxim Neshcheret wrote:
> Dear All
>
> I am deploying application (Tomcat 8.0.22, JDK 1.7.79, Solaris, SPARC, APR
> 1.5.2) and observing multiple erros while its communicates with client
> software (error presented below). It looks like that error happens while
> applicatio
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Sanaullah,
On 12/1/14 6:09 AM, Sanaullah wrote:
> I have attached the diff [that allows external crypto decides to
> be used via tcnative). let me know if its ok?
For reference, here's the diff:
>
> 304c304 < #if 1 //HAVE_ENGINE_LOAD_BUILTIN_ENGI
Hi Chris,
I have attached the diff.let me know if its ok?
Regards,
Sanaullah
On Fri, Nov 21, 2014 at 2:08 AM, Christopher Schultz <
ch...@christopherschultz.net> wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA256
>
> Sanaullah,
>
> On 11/18/14 10:26 PM, Sanaullah wrote:
> > Hi Chris,
>
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Sanaullah,
On 11/18/14 10:26 PM, Sanaullah wrote:
> Hi Chris,
>
> Engine is loaded Successfully. the issue is with tcnative.
> tcnative was not loading any engine and it was due to
> HAVE_ENGINE_LOAD_BUILTIN_ENGINES preprocessor which is unable to
Hi Chris,
Engine is loaded Successfully. the issue is with tcnative. tcnative was
not loading any engine and it was due to HAVE_ENGINE_LOAD_BUILTIN_ENGINES
preprocessor which is unable to call ENGINE_load_builtin_engines. I made
one change and in ssl.c of tomcat-native-1.1.31
original Preprocess
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Sanaullah,
On 11/14/14 10:04 PM, Sanaullah wrote:
> The Engine name is correct its "LunaCA3" Here is the code snippet
> from the openssl for the confirmation.
>
> openssl-1.0.1g/engines/e_lunaca3.c:#define ENGINE_LUNACA3_ID
> "LunaCA3"
>
> I thi
Hi Chris,
The Engine name is correct its "LunaCA3" Here is the code snippet from the
openssl for the confirmation.
openssl-1.0.1g/engines/e_lunaca3.c:#define ENGINE_LUNACA3_ID "LunaCA3"
I think the issue is with static and shared libraries of openssl. if
openssl build as shared then this LunaCA
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Sanaullah,
On 10/29/14 9:54 AM, Sanaullah wrote:
> I again started working on SSLEngine with safenet and i need some
> help, how to enable the debugging? I configure the engine as
> "LunaCA3".
>
> SSLEngine="LunaCA3" />
>
> Here is error log afte
I again started working on SSLEngine with safenet and i need some help, how
to enable the debugging? I configure the engine as "LunaCA3".
Here is error log after starting the server.
Oct 29, 2014 1:40:21 PM org.apache.catalina.core.AprLifecycleListener init
INFO: Loaded APR based Apache Tomcat
Hi Chris,
did you get any chance to take a look into the issue ?
Regards,
Sanaullah
On Wed, Aug 6, 2014 at 5:12 AM, Christopher Schultz <
ch...@christopherschultz.net> wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA256
>
> Sunaullah,
>
> On 7/26/14, 4:50 AM, Sanaullah wrote:
> > I trie
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Sunaullah,
On 7/26/14, 4:50 AM, Sanaullah wrote:
> I tried that configuration but getting errrors.
I just want you to know that you haven't been forgotten: I'm on
vacation for a bit but I'd really like to take a look at this issue
when I return.
I
I tried that configuration but getting errrors.
NFO: Loaded APR based Apache Tomcat Native library 1.1.30 using APR version
1.4.6.
Jul 23, 2014 3:06:40 AM org.apache.catalina.core.AprLifecycleListener init
INFO: APR capabilities: IPv6 [true], sendfile [true], accept filters
[false], random [true].
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Sanaullah,
On 7/25/14, 9:16 AM, Sanaullah wrote:
> httpd is working with HSM with addition of parameter
> SSLCryptoDevice=LunaCA but when i try the same parameter in tomEE.
> TomEE don't recognized this parameters.
>
> WARNING: [SetAllPropertiesR
Hi Chris,
httpd is working with HSM with addition of parameter
SSLCryptoDevice=LunaCA but when i try the same parameter in tomEE. TomEE
don't recognized this parameters.
WARNING: [SetAllPropertiesRule]{Server/Service/Connector} Setting property
'SSLCryptoDevice' to 'LunaCA3' did not find a match
Thanks chris,
I haven't tried such configurations with httpd. I will explore now.
Regards,
Sanaullah
On Thu, Jul 10, 2014 at 7:40 PM, Christopher Schultz <
ch...@christopherschultz.net> wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA256
>
> Sanaullah,
>
> On 7/10/14, 4:19 AM, Sanaullah
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Sanaullah,
On 7/10/14, 4:19 AM, Sanaullah wrote:
> is there a way i can use pkcs11 supported SmartCard/token when
> using APR based SSL Connector in tomcat ? PEM encoded certificates
> and keys are stored in smartcard.
>
> I know BIO/NIO connectors
Ok, thanks for the advice. If it means removing one more layer of
complexity, I'm all for it.
Best,
Alec
On Fri, Sep 20, 2013 at 11:57 PM, Christopher Schultz <
ch...@christopherschultz.net> wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA256
>
> Alec,
>
> On 9/20/13 2:03 PM, Tomcat Rand
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Alec,
On 9/20/13 2:03 PM, Tomcat Random wrote:
> Chris, Thanks for correcting the misdirected reply.
>
> "Do you mean it's not working under load, or you haven't yet tried
> it under load?"
>
> I mean I haven't tested it under load yet.
>
> One o
ep 19, 2013 at 1:56 PM, Jeffrey Janner wrote:
> > -Original Message-
> > From: Christopher Schultz [mailto:ch...@christopherschultz.net]
> > Sent: Thursday, September 19, 2013 12:38 PM
> > To: Tomcat Users List
> > Cc: Tomcat Random
> > Subject: Re: AP
> -Original Message-
> From: Christopher Schultz [mailto:ch...@christopherschultz.net]
> Sent: Thursday, September 19, 2013 12:38 PM
> To: Tomcat Users List
> Cc: Tomcat Random
> Subject: Re: APR Connector questions
>
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Alec,
Please keep discussions on the mailing lists so others can benefit
from them.
On 9/19/13 12:01 PM, Tomcat Random wrote:
> The answer for am I going to be using SSL is maybe. It's not
> mandatory, but would be nice for an admin area of the sit
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Alec,
Changed subject: it's APR (Apache Portable Runtime), not ARP (which is
something different).
On 9/19/13 11:39 AM, Tomcat Random wrote:
> Tomcat 7.0.42, RHEL6
>
> I've installed the APR connector and have my service.xml configured
> with the
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Jesse,
On 8/25/13 1:08 PM, Jesse Barnum wrote:
> On Aug 25, 2013, at 9:58 AM, Michael-O <1983-01...@gmx.net> wrote:
>
>> 1. Did you configure mod_ssl and APR Connector the same way?
> I'm not sure how to make sure that they are configured
> identic
On Aug 25, 2013, at 9:58 AM, Michael-O <1983-01...@gmx.net> wrote:
> 1. Did you configure mod_ssl and APR Connector the same way?
I'm not sure how to make sure that they are configured identically. The syntax
in server.xml is not identical to the syntax in apache2.conf. For example, in
Apache's
Am 2013-08-25 14:21, schrieb Jesse Barnum:
How come Java 6 can connect to SSL running on Apache without this
setting, but not to Tomcat running APR/SSL?
On Aug 24, 2013, at 12:15 PM, Michael-O <1983-01...@gmx.net> wrote:
I had this problem months ago too. APR Connector ist fine. The
problem wi
How come Java 6 can connect to SSL running on Apache without this setting, but
not to Tomcat running APR/SSL?
On Aug 24, 2013, at 12:15 PM, Michael-O <1983-01...@gmx.net> wrote:
> I had this problem months ago too. APR Connector ist fine. The problem with
> Java 6 is that the URLConnection -- J
Am 2013-08-24 18:10, schrieb Jesse Barnum:
I am trying to use SSL with Tomcat and an APR connector. This is
hosted on Ubuntu 13.04. I can make changes to the server, but not to
the existing Java client.
For some reason, whenever a Java 6 client connects to the Tomcat
server using SSL, it is not
Hi Jakob
I'm experiencing exact same problem.
Could you help me with the solution ? Since the thread is older I'm assuming
that you may have nailed it and found a solution.
Regards,
Gaurav
Jakob Ericsson wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> We are experiencing issues with AJP-communication between the httpd
>
Problem resolved! Thanks so much for all the helpful hints. I had
been going to the end of the catalina.out file and seeing this error
message in the last ~60 lines of text, and thought it represented the
latest restart errors. What I failed to notice, was that there WERE
previous errors above t
I understand you want to use APR, but just for troubleshooting purposes,
try using the same server.xml but changing the SSL connector from
protocol="org.apache.coyote.http11.Http11AprProtocol"
to
protocol="org.apache.coyote.http11.Http11NioProtocol"
If that works, then your problem is with APR,
2011/11/21 Eric Kemp :
> Below is my entire server.xml (minus commented lines)
>
Good to know.
Can you post the logs? (catalina..log file). Clear them first
then try starting Tomcat.
Best regards,
Konstantin Kolinko
-
To unsubs
sl/myDomain.com.key"
> SSLCACertificateFile="/etc/apache2/ssl/myDomain.com.ca.crt" />
>
>
>
> className="org.apache.catalina.realm.UserDatabaseRealm"
> resourceName="UserDatabase"/>
>
> name="localhost"
> a
Below is my entire server.xml (minus commented lines)
Thanks
On Sun, Nov 20, 2011 at 4:18 PM, Caldarale, Charles R
wrote:
>> From: Eric Kemp [mailto:cruisingat90...@gmail.com]
>> Subject: Re: APR SSL error:
> From: Eric Kemp [mailto:cruisingat90...@gmail.com]
> Subject: Re: APR SSL error: "Socket bind failed: [98] Address already in use"
> Any other ideas would still be appreciated.
As others have noted, the conflict is likely on some port other than 8443.
Post your entire ser
Changing from jdk1.7.0_01 to 1.6.0_20 still results in the same error.
I use the following commands to stop and start Tomcat:
sudo /etc/init.d/tomcat6 stop
sudo /etc/init.d/tomcat6 start
I have verified that the Tomcat process DOES shut down when initiating
a "stop" command via "ps -ef | grep jav
On 20 Nov 2011, at 12:49, Igor Cicimov wrote:
> Isnt 8005 shutdown port for tomcat? I can see sshd bound to that port
> already.
I think that's the line above...
There is a java process holding 8005
> On Nov 20, 2011 6:33 PM, "Konstantin Kolinko"
> wrote:
>
>> 2011/11/19 Eric Kemp :
>>> Summa
Isnt 8005 shutdown port for tomcat? I can see sshd bound to that port
already.
On Nov 20, 2011 6:33 PM, "Konstantin Kolinko"
wrote:
> 2011/11/19 Eric Kemp :
> > Summary: I'm looking for ideas on how to resolve this "Address already
> > in use" error when configuring SSL in Tomcat APR.
> >
> > Env
On 19 Nov 2011, at 18:44, Eric Kemp wrote:
> Summary: I'm looking for ideas on how to resolve this "Address already
> in use" error when configuring SSL in Tomcat APR.
>
> Environment:
> Running Apache Tomcat/6.0.24
> on OS is Ubuntu 10.04.2 LTS
> with JVM 1.7.0_01-b08
>
> //
> // Prior to config
2011/11/19 Eric Kemp :
> Summary: I'm looking for ideas on how to resolve this "Address already
> in use" error when configuring SSL in Tomcat APR.
>
> Environment:
> Running Apache Tomcat/6.0.24
That one is old. Maybe you can upgrade to 6.0.33?
> on OS is Ubuntu 10.04.2 LTS
> with JVM 1.7.0_0
I've seen several places where people say [98] is the error message
number - not the port number. Also, I'm not doing anything with port
98.
Thanks
On Sat, Nov 19, 2011 at 8:03 PM, Talal Rabaa wrote:
> Looks like you have another service (not necessarily Tomcat) running on port
> 98.
>
> On 2
Looks like you have another service (not necessarily Tomcat) running on port 98.
On 2011-11-19, at 1:44 PM, Eric Kemp wrote:
> Summary: I'm looking for ideas on how to resolve this "Address already
> in use" error when configuring SSL in Tomcat APR.
>
> Environment:
> Running Apache Tomcat/6.0.2
My goal with this thread was to rise awareness with APR connector poll time
defaults, as some users will not really bother investigating why their
servers have such high context switches / timer interrupts. There is no
"problem" here as Tomcat is working fine with defaults.
There should be no ha
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Darius,
On 7/18/2011 2:23 PM, Darius D. wrote:
> Does Tomcat APR really needs pollTime set so low by default? I
> thought timeout is meant for some sort of book keeping, where is all
> connections in FD set are "idle", no events come for timeout perio
> Does Tomcat APR really needs pollTime set so low by default?
Anyone care to comment on this point? I'm interested in this
discussion as a user of Linux+APR connectors. While we don't yet run
on a tickless kernel, I'm considering trying to measure the impact on
our systems as well, but some ins
Darius D. wrote:
>
>
> Does Tomcat APR really needs pollTime set so low by default? I thought
> timeout is meant for some sort of book keeping, where is all connections
> in FD set are "idle", no events come for timeout period - you force
> timeout and do bookkeeping - on a busy system you will
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
To whom it may concern,
On 6/30/2011 4:21 PM, ccastle wrote:
> I have the same problem [where APR won't load], except that in the log it is
> not specified what
> library is needed.
You don't need to read the logs to see what library is needed, you
Hello.
I have the same problem, except that in the log it is not specified what
library is needed. This are the messages in the log:
30-jun-2011 15:13:03 org.apache.coyote.http11.Http11Protocol pause
INFO: Pausing Coyote HTTP/1.1 on http-8080
30-jun-2011 15:13:04 org.apache.catalina.core.Standar
ple, reproducible test
case then please open a bugzilla issue.
Mark
>
> Thank you!
>
>> -Original Message-
>> From: Mark Thomas [mailto:ma...@apache.org]
>> Sent: Dienstag, 21. Dezember 2010 14:10
>> To: Tomcat Users List
>> Subjec
ot;X-...", ...).
Thank you!
> -Original Message-
> From: Mark Thomas [mailto:ma...@apache.org]
> Sent: Dienstag, 21. Dezember 2010 14:10
> To: Tomcat Users List
> Subject: Re: APR and async request
>
> On 21/12/2010 13:07, spr...@gmx.eu wrote:
>
On 21/12/2010 13:07, spr...@gmx.eu wrote:
> OK; I've got it...
>
> when I change the Connector from HTTP/1.1 to
> org.apache.coyote.http11.Http11NioProtocol is works.
> Sounds a bit logical (Non-Blocking and async) but can someone please
> explain?
You'll need to explain what you mean by async re
OK; I've got it...
when I change the Connector from HTTP/1.1 to
org.apache.coyote.http11.Http11NioProtocol is works.
Sounds a bit logical (Non-Blocking and async) but can someone please
explain?
Thank you
> when I disable APR by removing the tcnative-1.dll or by removing the APR
> listener from
On 03/12/2010 09:35, André Warnier wrote:
> David Dabbs wrote:
>> Would it provide better performance for AJP connector processing?
>
> Not at all. The comparison you have been pointed to refers to HTTP
> connectors.
> AJP is another (different) protocol, and has a different connector.
The AJP c
: Caldarale, Charles R [mailto:chuck.caldar...@unisys.com]
Sent: Thursday, December 02, 2010 3:09 PM
To: Tomcat Users List
Subject: RE: APR/Native: when to use it?
From: Aggarwal, Ajay [mailto:ajay.aggar...@stratus.com]
Subject: APR/Native: when to use it?
Is it always advisable to use APR if tomcat is
Would it provide better performance for AJP connector processing?
Thanks,
David
-Original Message-
From: Caldarale, Charles R [mailto:chuck.caldar...@unisys.com]
Sent: Thursday, December 02, 2010 3:09 PM
To: Tomcat Users List
Subject: RE: APR/Native: when to use it?
> From: Aggar
Thanks for your quick response, but I still don't know when should I use
APR. That comparison table doesn't help me much (perhaps my ignorance
here).
-Original Message-
> Is it always advisable to use APR if tomcat is the main
> web server?
No.
> Does it provide better performance for
> From: Aggarwal, Ajay [mailto:ajay.aggar...@stratus.com]
> Subject: APR/Native: when to use it?
> Is it always advisable to use APR if tomcat is the main
> web server?
No.
> Does it provide better performance for core tomcat engine
> or do you need to write code to take advantage of it?
Tha
On 18/10/2010 23:20, Simon Funnell wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I wanted to know if it was worth using the sendfile features for small
> static files or is the APR already optimised for serving static content?
>
> I basically have a jsp that makes a choice between serving up a static
> (.html) and custom ver
On Tue, 19 Oct 2010 11:05:42 +0100, Simon Funnell
wrote:
I guess my question is, if I use
instead of sendfile, is their any difference?
I figure that if I have lots of unauthenticated users this will help
with maintaining the load.
I'm afraid, that processing of directive is so
expensive
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
To whom it may concern,
On 10/12/2010 11:00 AM, efftronics wrote:
> I am running apache tomcat 6.0.18 , java 1.6 on windows xp platform.
> I copied tcnative-1.dll and openssl.exe(1.1.14 version) in
> C:\apache-tomcat-6.0.18\bin . But i w
> From: Christopher Schultz [mailto:ch...@christopherschultz.net]
> Subject: Re: APR & Tomcat...
>
> > Was that vs BIO or NIO? As I recall, there is no sendFile
> > capability in BIO, so both NIO and APR should beat that.
>
> BIO = JIO, right? Too many TLAs
:40 AM
Subject: Re: APR & Tomcat...
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Tony,
On 7/20/2010 12:35 AM, Tony Anecito wrote:
> Interesting. I saw that when a static file was around 21K or below a dramatic
> improvement in recorded time in the log for APR. I have not tried with
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Tony,
On 7/20/2010 12:35 AM, Tony Anecito wrote:
> Interesting. I saw that when a static file was around 21K or below a dramatic
> improvement in recorded time in the log for APR. I have not tried with
> regular
> Apache Web Server to see what I ge
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Chuck,
On 7/19/2010 11:50 PM, Caldarale, Charles R wrote:
>> From: Christopher Schultz [mailto:ch...@christopherschultz.net]
>> Subject: Re: APR & Tomcat...
>>
>> My tests show that use of sendFile is dramatically faste
- Original Message
From: Pid
To: Tomcat Users List
Sent: Tue, July 20, 2010 10:11:39 AM
Subject: Re: APR & Tomcat...
On 19/07/2010 22:21, Tony Anecito wrote:
> Hi Pid
>
> First off I get a little red x in the upper left hand corner of the web page.
Excellent technical d
ot?
p
> Best Regards,
> -Tony
>
>
>
> - Original Message
> From: Pid
> To: Tomcat Users List
> Sent: Mon, July 19, 2010 3:05:41 PM
> Subject: Re: APR & Tomcat...
>
> On 19/07/2010 19:44, Tony Anecito wrote:
>> Hi All,
>>
>> I ha
Christopher Schultz wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Dale,
On 7/19/2010 7:42 PM, Dale Ogilvie wrote:
Reasons to use httpd being what?
Here are a few ideas:
1. Load balancing
2. Use of mixed Java and non-Java webapps (PHP, Perl, etc.)
3. Use of multiple Tomcat instances b
Users List
Sent: Mon, July 19, 2010 9:50:59 PM
Subject: RE: APR & Tomcat...
> From: Christopher Schultz [mailto:ch...@christopherschultz.net]
> Subject: Re: APR & Tomcat...
>
> My tests show that use of sendFile is dramatically faster
> than without.
Was that vs BIO or NIO?
> From: Christopher Schultz [mailto:ch...@christopherschultz.net]
> Subject: Re: APR & Tomcat...
>
> My tests show that use of sendFile is dramatically faster
> than without.
Was that vs BIO or NIO? As I recall, there is no sendFile capability in BIO,
so both NIO and A
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Dale,
On 7/19/2010 7:42 PM, Dale Ogilvie wrote:
> Reasons to use httpd being what?
Here are a few ideas:
1. Load balancing
2. Use of mixed Java and non-Java webapps (PHP, Perl, etc.)
3. Use of multiple Tomcat instances behind a single web server
If
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Chuck,
On 7/19/2010 9:57 PM, Caldarale, Charles R wrote:
>> From: Tony Anecito [mailto:adanec...@yahoo.com]
>> Subject: Re: APR & Tomcat...
>>
>> So as to say the Tomcat group did not want to compete
>> why build t
> From: Tony Anecito [mailto:adanec...@yahoo.com]
> Subject: Re: APR & Tomcat...
>
> The disadvantages are such as when Tomcat is taken down
> so does your static content.
So why are you taking Tomcat down? "Doctor, doctor, it hurts when I do this!"
> I am gue
> From: Dale Ogilvie [mailto:dale.ogil...@trimble.co.nz]
> Subject: RE: APR & Tomcat...
>
> Reasons to use httpd being what?
Serving PHP and as a poor man's load balancer, for starters.
> The reason we used httpd in the past was "httpd serves
> static content
> From: Tony Anecito [mailto:adanec...@yahoo.com]
> Subject: Re: APR & Tomcat...
>
> So as to say the Tomcat group did not want to compete
> why build the APR?
Tomcat people did not create it - APR has been around for years. It's part of
many products (e.g., subve
be used to
tune the heck out of static and semi-static content!
--
Richard Maynard
-Original Message-
From: Tony Anecito [mailto:adanec...@yahoo.com]
Sent: Monday, July 19, 2010 7:42 PM
To: Tomcat Users List
Subject: Re: APR & Tomcat...
I used APR for performance reasons. I was runn
load
balancing.
So APR Native was an experiment for me not a final solution. Time to go back to
reality.
Thanks,
-Tony
- Original Message
From: Dale Ogilvie
To: Tomcat Users List
Sent: Mon, July 19, 2010 5:42:39 PM
Subject: RE: APR & Tomcat...
Reasons to use httpd being what
.m.
To: Tomcat Users List
Subject: Re: APR & Tomcat...
There certainly are reasons to use Apache httpd out in front of Tomcat,
but performance isn't one of them.
- -chris
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@tomcat.apa
1 - 100 of 207 matches
Mail list logo
