[RESOLVED] Re: malformed HTTP?

Tim Funk joedog.org> writes: > > Actually - it might be more like > http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=37627 > > -Tim Thanks Tim! --p - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mai

Re: malformed HTTP?

Actually - it might be more like http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=37627 -Tim Patricio Keilty wrote: Tim Funk joedog.org> writes: There is a bugzilla report similar to this - but also check 5.1.15 since it has some fixes too. -Tim Thanks for your response Tim Think

Re: malformed HTTP?

Tim Funk joedog.org> writes: > > There is a bugzilla report similar to this - but also check 5.1.15 since it > has some fixes too. > > -Tim Thanks for your response Tim Think i´ve found the bug you were referring to http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=33714 whose status is

Re: malformed HTTP?

also show not well formed html, this made me think tomcat was responding with "malformed" HTTP. Comparing my old server.xml fine with the one in v5.5.4 binaries, i could see a difference in attributes: maxHttpHeaderSize="8192" was not set in my old config. After adding this attrib

malformed HTTP?

ot; html, kind of source code view in my browser window, and also some Response HTTP Header data appended. I first blame on my FireFox browser, but Mozilla and IE will also show not well formed html, this made me think tomcat was responding with "malformed" HTTP. Comparing my old server.