-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Felix,
On 5/2/2011 12:20 PM, Felix Schumacher wrote:
> That would be nice, if it would work, but sadly it doesn't.
>
> redirect is only alowed for a sub-worker, which is referenced indirectly
> by a load balancer group.
> See http://tomcat.apache.or
Am Montag, den 02.05.2011, 10:06 -0400 schrieb Christopher Schultz:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> Felix,
>
> On 4/30/2011 5:09 AM, Felix Schumacher wrote:
> > The original req, as I understood it:
> >
> > tomcat1
> > \-- /abc* (active)
> > |-- /def* (passive)
> >
>
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Felix,
On 4/30/2011 5:09 AM, Felix Schumacher wrote:
> The original req, as I understood it:
>
> tomcat1
> \-- /abc* (active)
> |-- /def* (passive)
>
> tomcat2
> \-- /abc* (passive)
> |-- /def* (active)
>
> If one of those tomcat server
On Fri, 29 Apr 2011 18:39:09 -0400, Christopher Schultz wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Felix,
On 4/28/2011 12:44 PM, Felix Schumacher wrote:
"Christopher Schultz" schrieb:
Felix and Guillaume,
I think you guys are working too hard for this. Isn't it as simple
as
using
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Felix,
On 4/28/2011 12:44 PM, Felix Schumacher wrote:
> "Christopher Schultz" schrieb:
>
> Felix and Guillaume,
>
>> I think you guys are working too hard for this. Isn't it as simple as
>> using a redirect from each worker to the other, with no cl
Hi Felix,
To keep you posted, your solution is working smoothly, the error was coming
from redirect set to the cluster instead of the jvmRoute.
My point (and for now it is a pure theorical question as I don't have the
need) was If I want to add a third or fourth server (for load reason). I
will h
"Christopher Schultz" schrieb:
>-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
>Hash: SHA1
>
>Felix and Guillaume,
>
>I think you guys are working too hard for this. Isn't it as simple as
>using a redirect from each worker to the other, with no clustering or
>anything like that? You don't even need to set
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Felix and Guillaume,
I think you guys are working too hard for this. Isn't it as simple as
using a redirect from each worker to the other, with no clustering or
anything like that? You don't even need to set jvmRoute, etc. since
there's no cluster.
-
On Wed, 27 Apr 2011 21:15:36 +0100, Guillaume Favier wrote:
On Wed, Apr 27, 2011 at 8:55 PM, Felix Schumacher <
felix.schumac...@internetallee.de> wrote:
Am Mittwoch, den 27.04.2011, 19:20 +0100 schrieb Guillaume Favier:
> Felix,
>
> Dis you check my workaround ?
>
>
> On Wed, Apr 27, 2011 at 7
On Wed, Apr 27, 2011 at 8:55 PM, Felix Schumacher <
felix.schumac...@internetallee.de> wrote:
> Am Mittwoch, den 27.04.2011, 19:20 +0100 schrieb Guillaume Favier:
> > Felix,
> >
> > Dis you check my workaround ?
> >
> >
> > On Wed, Apr 27, 2011 at 7:01 PM, Felix Schumacher <
> > felix.schumac...@i
Am Mittwoch, den 27.04.2011, 19:20 +0100 schrieb Guillaume Favier:
> Felix,
>
> Dis you check my workaround ?
>
>
> On Wed, Apr 27, 2011 at 7:01 PM, Felix Schumacher <
> felix.schumac...@internetallee.de> wrote:
>
> > Am Mittwoch, den 27.04.2011, 10:21 +0200 schrieb Felix Schumacher:
> > > On W
Felix,
Dis you check my workaround ?
On Wed, Apr 27, 2011 at 7:01 PM, Felix Schumacher <
felix.schumac...@internetallee.de> wrote:
> Am Mittwoch, den 27.04.2011, 10:21 +0200 schrieb Felix Schumacher:
> > On Wed, 27 Apr 2011 09:58:45 +0200, Felix Schumacher wrote:
> > > On Tue, 26 Apr 2011 21:24
Am Mittwoch, den 27.04.2011, 10:21 +0200 schrieb Felix Schumacher:
> On Wed, 27 Apr 2011 09:58:45 +0200, Felix Schumacher wrote:
> > On Tue, 26 Apr 2011 21:24:16 +0100, Guillaume Favier wrote:
> >> Thanks for your answer Felix,
> > Well, after rethinking my original answer, I think you will have to
Hi Felix,
That's strange, it doesn't try to connect to the c1t2 worker, here is the
log file.
[Wed Apr 27 11:45:33 2011] [4129:47406689800960] [info]
jk_open_socket::jk_connect.c (626): connect to 127.0.0.1:9001 failed
(errno=111)
[Wed Apr 27 11:45:33 2011] [4129:47406689800960] [info]
ajp_conne
On Wed, 27 Apr 2011 09:58:45 +0200, Felix Schumacher wrote:
On Tue, 26 Apr 2011 21:24:16 +0100, Guillaume Favier wrote:
Thanks for your answer Felix,
Well, after rethinking my original answer, I think you will have to
define two clusters:
worker.list=cluster1,cluster2
...
worker.c2t2.ty
Thanks Felix, that might do the trick. I'll test it and get back to you.
nice hack BTW.
gui
On Wed, Apr 27, 2011 at 8:58 AM, Felix Schumacher <
felix.schumac...@internetallee.de> wrote:
> On Tue, 26 Apr 2011 21:24:16 +0100, Guillaume Favier wrote:
>
>> Thanks for your answer Felix,
>>
> Well, aft
On Tue, 26 Apr 2011 21:24:16 +0100, Guillaume Favier wrote:
Thanks for your answer Felix,
Well, after rethinking my original answer, I think you will have to
define two clusters:
worker.list=cluster1,cluster2
where each cluster worker has two distinct members
worker.cluster1.type=lb
wo
Thanks for your answer Felix,
On Tue, Apr 26, 2011 at 8:36 PM, Felix Schumacher <
felix.schumac...@internetallee.de> wrote:
> On Mon, 25 Apr 2011 09:40:59 +0100, Guillaume Favier wrote:
>
>> Hi,
>>
>> I have 2 tomcat 5.5 server. Each of them handling a set (50+) of third
>> party
>> webapps name
On Mon, 25 Apr 2011 09:40:59 +0100, Guillaume Favier wrote:
Hi,
I have 2 tomcat 5.5 server. Each of them handling a set (50+) of
third party
webapps name /ABC* and /DEF*.
Each of these webapp is quite memory consumming when started (more
than
300M).
I would like all connection to ABC* webapp
Sorry for the double post, but I didn't see any remarks on this thread.
This a tricky question (at least for me), and I am a bit stuck here.
thanks
gui
Hi,
>
> I have 2 tomcat 5.5 server. Each of them handling a set (50+) of third
> party webapps name /ABC* and /DEF*.
> Each of these webapp is q
Hi,
I have 2 tomcat 5.5 server. Each of them handling a set (50+) of third party
webapps name /ABC* and /DEF*.
Each of these webapp is quite memory consumming when started (more than
300M).
I would like all connection to ABC* webapps be handled by tomcat server 1,
and connection to webapps DEF* to
21 matches
Mail list logo
