Re: tomcat 7.0.25 - tomcat7 //US//.... ++jmvOptions broken ??

2012-02-06 Thread Mark Thomas
On 06/02/2012 04:53, Caldarale, Charles R wrote: >> From: Dan Tran [mailto:dant...@gmail.com] >> Subject: Re: tomcat 7.0.25 - tomcat7 //US// ++jmvOptions broken ?? > >> it seems procrun already fixed this issue at its end. > > Only in SVN, no new commons-daem

RE: tomcat 7.0.25 - tomcat7 //US//.... ++jmvOptions broken ??

2012-02-05 Thread Caldarale, Charles R
> From: Dan Tran [mailto:dant...@gmail.com] > Subject: Re: tomcat 7.0.25 - tomcat7 //US//.... ++jmvOptions broken ?? > it seems procrun already fixed this issue at its end. Only in SVN, no new commons-daemon releases yet. > does tomcat team has a tentative schedule date for 7.0.

Re: tomcat 7.0.25 - tomcat7 //US//.... ++jmvOptions broken ??

2012-02-05 Thread Dan Tran
it seems procrun already fixed this issue at its end. does tomcat team has a tentative schedule date for 7.0.26? Thanks -Dan On Sun, Feb 5, 2012 at 1:46 AM, Dan Tran wrote: > I also notice commons-deamon is upgraded after tomcat 7.0.23 > > Would this be the main issue? > > -D > > On Sun, Feb 5

Re: tomcat 7.0.25 - tomcat7 //US//.... ++jmvOptions broken ??

2012-02-05 Thread markt
Dan Tran wrote: >I also notice commons-deamon is upgraded after tomcat 7.0.23 > >Would this be the main issue? > >-D > >On Sun, Feb 5, 2012 at 1:40 AM, Dan Tran wrote: >> Hello, >> >> Starting tomcat 7.0.25, update windows tomcat server option using >> ++jmvOptions seems to replace existing opti

Re: tomcat 7.0.25 - tomcat7 //US//.... ++jmvOptions broken ??

2012-02-05 Thread Dan Tran
I also notice commons-deamon is upgraded after tomcat 7.0.23 Would this be the main issue? -D On Sun, Feb 5, 2012 at 1:40 AM, Dan Tran wrote: > Hello, > > Starting tomcat 7.0.25, update windows tomcat server option using > ++jmvOptions seems to replace existing option. > > Can someone confirm t

tomcat 7.0.25 - tomcat7 //US//.... ++jmvOptions broken ??

2012-02-05 Thread Dan Tran
Hello, Starting tomcat 7.0.25, update windows tomcat server option using ++jmvOptions seems to replace existing option. Can someone confirm this? run bin/service.bat, and you can see the last ++jmvOptions replaces previous configuration Thanks -D Note: I have a custom bat script to setup my W