On Tuesday 05 October 2010 19:30:38, Pedro Alves wrote:
> Now, given this, I won't be surprised if you're seeing races
> with ->s, <-OK, ->vCont sequences, as GDB may well be thinking
> that the "OK" is a reply to the vCont.
>
I meant ->s, <-OK, ->vStopped sequences.
--
Pedro Alves
On Tuesday 05 October 2010 18:27:29, Oleg Nesterov wrote:
> The more or less "typical" transcript is:
>
> [... snip ...]
> => s
This is already wrong.
"The stub must support @samp{vCont} if it reports support for
multiprocess extensions (@pxref{multiprocess extensions})."
The stub
On 10/04, Oleg Nesterov wrote:
>
> While trying to understand what does this mean, I hit another bug
> in ugdb.
No, /usr/bin/gdb is buggy.
> A multithreaded tracee can "hang" if gdb simulates
> watchpoints with single-steps + mem-fetch/compare.
It doesn't, but gdb "forgets" about the pending "St
