[mailto:m...@redhat.com]
Sent: Saturday, April 23, 2011 11:13 AM
To: Turgis, Frederic
Cc: Frank Ch. Eigler; utrace-devel@redhat.com; Roland McGrath
Subject: Re: utrace support on ARM
> I will see if I can interest people in TI and Linaro.
> I will need a good story... ;-)
This desc
> I will see if I can interest people in TI and Linaro.
> I will need a good story... ;-)
This describes why you want user_regset:
http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.linux.kernel/616284
This describes why you want tracehooks:
http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.linux.kernel/707950
Both those patch sets hav
> I will see if I can interest people in TI and Linaro. I will need a good
> story... ;-)
It is kernel port modernization work that nearly every other platform has
done by now.
R.C.S Antibes. Capital de EUR 753.920
-Original Message-
From: Mark Wielaard [mailto:m...@redhat.com]
Sent: Friday, April 22, 2011 10:18 AM
To: Roland McGrath
Cc: Frank Ch. Eigler; utrace-devel@redhat.com; Turgis, Frederic
Subject: Re: utrace support on ARM
> utrace per se has no mach
> utrace per se has no machine-dependent code. It requires modern
> support for machine dependencies in generic kernel code,
> i.e. user_regset and tracehook. The ARM kernel has a tiny
> subset of those, but not enough to be useful.
> Long ago I did 98% of the work for implementing user_regset
> a
utrace per se has no machine-dependent code. It requires modern support
for machine dependencies in generic kernel code, i.e. user_regset and
tracehook. The ARM kernel has a tiny subset of those, but not enough to be
useful. Long ago I did 98% of the work for implementing user_regset and
traceho
UR 753.920
-Original Message-
From: Frank Ch. Eigler [mailto:f...@redhat.com]
Sent: Thursday, April 21, 2011 7:51 PM
To: Turgis, Frederic
Cc: utrace-devel@redhat.com; Mark Wielaard
Subject: Re: utrace support on ARM
f-turgis wrote:
> [...]
> So I am interested in this kind of status:
>
>
f-turgis wrote:
> [...]
> So I am interested in this kind of status:
>
> * utrace has not been accepted upstream. Does it mean it may lose
> traction ? Is "community" pushing for something else or happy with
> what they have ? [...]
There are many communities. I am not anticipating additional u
Hi Turgis,
On Wed, 2011-04-20 at 10:00 +0200, Turgis, Frederic wrote:
> * utrace has not been accepted upstream. Does it mean it may lose
> traction ? Is "community" pushing for something else or happy with
> what they have ?
Parts haven't. utrace builds upon regsets and tracehooks, which are bot
Villeneuve Loubet.
036 420 040 R.C.S Antibes. Capital de EUR 753.920
-Original Message-
From: Mark Wielaard [mailto:m...@redhat.com]
Sent: Tuesday, March 29, 2011 5:26 PM
To: Turgis, Frederic
Cc: utrace-devel@redhat.com
Subject: Re: utrace support on ARM
On Tue, 2011-03-29 at 16:26 +02
On Tue, 2011-03-29 at 16:26 +0200, Turgis, Frederic wrote:
> - http://people.redhat.com/roland/utrace is no longer valid. Where has
> it been moved ?
http://userweb.kernel.org/~frob/utrace/
> - Mail archive in https://www.redhat.com/archives/utrace-devel/ stops
> in December. Did I miss something
Hi all,
In the scope of profiling work with systemtap, I would like to test systemtap
user-space probing capabilities based on uprobes/utrace.
- is anyone maintaining some port for ARM architecture ?
- http://people.redhat.com/roland/utrace is no longer valid. Where has it been
moved ? (think
12 matches
Mail list logo
