It is pending review, so not going to stage 3 just yet.
☆*PhistucK*
On Mon, Jan 6, 2020 at 8:07 PM Frank Tang wrote:
>
>
> On Mon, Jan 6, 2020 at 10:05 AM Frank Tang wrote:
>
>>
>>
>> On Sun, Jan 5, 2020 at 11:21 PM Yoav Weiss wrote:
>>
>>>
>
Is this intentionally not an intent to implement and ship, by the way?
☆*PhistucK*
On Mon, Aug 12, 2019 at 7:32 PM 'Gabriel Giannattasio' via blink-dev <
blink-...@chromium.org> wrote:
> This is a great feature to add, looking forward to seeing it in production
> :)
>
ctions.
☆*PhistucK*
On Wed, Aug 7, 2019 at 2:56 AM Boris Zbarsky wrote:
> On 8/6/19 5:55 PM, Gus Caplan wrote:
> > Firefox: Public support (
> https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1566143)
>
> For what it's worth, there are no signals from Mozilla in that bug
&
Thank you for your thoughts, all.
I filed an issue with HTML -
https://github.com/whatwg/html/issues/4630
☆*PhistucK*
On Wed, May 15, 2019 at 10:52 PM Shane Carr wrote:
> Hi PhistucK,
>
> Thanks for the feedback! Adding HTML for Intl features would be out of
> scope for this
-
State/province:
☆*PhistucK*
On Tue, May 14, 2019 at 5:03 AM Frank Tang wrote:
>
>
> On Mon, May 13, 2019 at 6:56 PM 'Frank Tang (譚永鋒)' via v8-dev <
> v8-...@googlegroups.com> wrote:
>
>>
>>
>> *From: *Mathias Bynens
>> *Date: *Mo
Can you make the example clearer?
["...", index: 0, input: "..."] is unfamiliar, invalid syntax.
☆*PhistucK*
On Fri, Dec 14, 2018 at 2:19 AM Peter Wong wrote:
> Contact emails
> peter.wm.w...@gmail.com
> jgru...@chromium.org
> yang...@chromium.org
>
> m
Are the specification and implementation compatible with the Babel based
implementation/interpretation of the feature? After all, previously
transpiled code could now be interpreted natively...
Unfortunately, this is also considered "Web compatibility".
☆*PhistucK*
On Wed, Oct 17, 201
Great catch goes to han.guokai@ which filed the original issue. :)
By the way, all of the pull requests were merged, so mostly accidentally
old code would be broken at this point (unless new cases were added since
then :().
I will work on the change list again soon.
☆*PhistucK*
On Thu, Sep 6
Comments inline.
☆*PhistucK*
On Wed, Aug 8, 2018 at 3:29 AM Adam Klein wrote:
> Apologies for the delay, this got hidden from me due to some gmail
> filtering issues...comments inline.
>
> On Thu, Jul 26, 2018 at 2:14 PM PhistucK wrote:
>
>> I misremembered formatTo
Thoughts, anyone?
☆*PhistucK*
On Fri, Jul 27, 2018 at 12:13 AM PhistucK wrote:
> I misremembered formatToParts as a relatively recent feature, but now I
> see that the intent I remembered was actually discussing NumberFormat.
> DateTimeFormat did not seem to have an intent on blink-d
tion to add a use counter to V8?
Is there an existing use counter for formatToParts altogether that I may
have missed (or maybe it is internal)?
Also, Node does not have to use V8 anymore, just saying. ;)
☆*PhistucK*
On Thu, Jul 26, 2018 at 7:59 PM Adam Klein wrote:
> +Jungshik and Da
Yep, I know. No rush.
☆*PhistucK*
On Fri, Jul 20, 2018 at 9:24 PM Chris Harrelson
wrote:
>
>
> On Fri, Jul 20, 2018 at 10:00 AM PhistucK wrote:
>
>> Guess so, though I am personally not going through with the change if
>> there are any blink-dev reservations. ;)
>
Guess so, though I am personally not going through with the change if there
are any blink-dev reservations. ;)
☆*PhistucK*
On Fri, Jul 20, 2018 at 7:55 PM Philip Jägenstedt
wrote:
> This is an FYI for blink-dev, right? Should I remove it from
> https://bit.ly/blinkintents?
>
> On
ps://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/v8/v8/+/1145304
Link to entry on the feature dashboard <https://www.chromestatus.com/>
https://www.chromestatus.com/features/5252265900244992
Requesting approval to ship?
Yes. I think so. Do you think a deprecation period is warranted? There is
no (publi
ions from them are not a given (not as far as "strongly positive").
I think it makes sense to add links for opinions that are not your own.
Just my two or three cents.
☆*PhistucK*
On Fri, Feb 16, 2018 at 3:07 PM, Mathias Bynens wrote:
> Note that since this is a V8/JS feature, t
(At least on blink-dev)
"Interoperability risk" should have links for citing each vendor and web
developer support.
☆*PhistucK*
On Fri, Feb 16, 2018 at 2:15 PM, Mathias Bynens
wrote:
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> *Contact emailsmath...@chromium.org
> Spechtt
> and Edge ships this anyway
I wonder whether those specific Microsoft products even support Edge.
Hunch? No.
I think this should be shipped regardless. It feels like a low-ransom
hostage situation. :P
☆*PhistucK*
On Thu, Feb 1, 2018 at 3:18 AM, Rick Byers wrote:
> Yay!
> Given th
Will it be a lot of effort to just run the tests and create a list of
failures? I can go over a manageable part of them and see if something
looks fishy.
☆*PhistucK*
On Wed, Jun 21, 2017 at 9:07 PM, wrote:
> I expect a significant number of tests will fail due to the different
> sem
Since this (intent) is a big feature, I think it would be appropriate to
run the entire suite in a module scope before it is shipped.
Do you think it would take a lot of work to do that?
☆*PhistucK*
On Wed, Jun 21, 2017 at 8:27 PM, Adam Klein wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 21, 2017 at 9:44 AM, Phist
On Wed, Jun 21, 2017 at 6:25 PM, Domenic Denicola wrote:
>
the same engine, but who knows, it may uncover
hidden peculiarities in the engine)
☆*PhistucK*
On Wed, Jun 21, 2017 at 6:54 PM, Adam Klein wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 21, 2017 at 8:25 AM, Domenic Denicola wrote:
>
>> From: blink-...@chromium.org [mailto:blink-...@chromium.org] On
Since there is no intent-to-ship-modules thread in V8 (and since this
intent brings module support into HTML as well as scripts and not just one
or the other), I think the test262 question is very much appropriate in
this thread (you may disagree, but I may, too ;)).
☆*PhistucK*
On Wed, Jun 21
that signals that the fetch event is for a module fetch?
☆*PhistucK*
--
--
v8-users mailing list
v8-users@googlegroups.com
http://groups.google.com/group/v8-users
---
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"v8-users" group.
To unsubscribe from this gr
around 2001, so not a novice by definition.)
☆*PhistucK*
On Sun, Apr 30, 2017 at 6:02 AM, kai zhu wrote:
> i apologize if this is not the most appropriate mailing list, but i can’t
> help but express my frustration at the chaos in frontend-world caused by
> over-abuse of all the new es
Cool, thank you and sorry!
☆*PhistucK*
On Thu, Apr 27, 2017 at 6:20 PM, Jeffrey Yasskin
wrote:
> Stage 3 is exactly the stage at which implementations are supposed to
> ship: https://tc39.github.io/process-document/, in particular the
> entrance criteria for stage 4 requi
Is it fine to ship it as it is a stage 3 proposal at the moment?
See tc39/proposals <https://github.com/tc39/proposals>.
☆*PhistucK*
On Fri, Apr 21, 2017 at 12:04 AM, Adam Klein wrote:
> Thanks, LGTM to ship!
>
> On Thu, Apr 20, 2017 at 12:38 PM, Sathya Gunasekaran > wrote
build. So the situation is
the same as with WebKit and Gecko.
I really do not like this feature (why does C++ exclude this?)...
JavaScript is loose enough as it is, but this is not the place for such
feedback. :)
☆*PhistucK*
--
--
v8-users mailing list
v8-users@googlegroups.com
http://groups.googl
Yes, I am. I already noticed it is blocking the Chromium issue.
Thank you!
☆*PhistucK*
On Thu, Oct 20, 2016 at 9:33 AM, Yang Guo wrote:
> I guess you are looking for https://bugs.chromium.org/
> p/v8/issues/detail?id=178
>
> This is a long standing feature request that has not be
Yeah, I wish. I do not have a strong machine yet. :(
I wanted to try an old version of Chromium (which does not have
[Unforgeable] yet), but my corporate proxy is blocking me from using the
site in question. I will try again when I am home.
☆*PhistucK*
On Thu, Oct 20, 2016 at 9:31 AM
File crbug.com/657697 (and crbug.com/657700 for a related bug I found as
a result :(). But it is really a duplicate of crbug.com/49 (so I closed
mine). I guess it will not be in progress soon. :(
☆*PhistucK*
On Thu, Oct 20, 2016 at 8:19 AM, Jochen Eisinger
wrote:
> As far as I k
I wanted to know whether there is a V8 (or Chrome) flag of some sort that
will let me add breakpoints on native function calls.
I do not mean C++ functions, I mean built in web platform (or ECMAScript)
functions.
My issue is that I click on a link and suddenly some code is apparently
calling doc
ich is not ideal...
☆*PhistucK*
On Mon, Sep 26, 2016 at 9:42 AM, Jochen Eisinger
wrote:
> Thanks for tracking this down. In general, if you're willing / able to
> provide a repro case, we're happy to investigate suchs bugs ourselves, so
> you don't have to go through the
d have
reported it if it did not require days of investigations).
☆*PhistucK*
On Sat, Sep 24, 2016 at 1:45 PM, PhistucK wrote:
> Thank you! Unfortunately, for everyone, it is getting clearer and clearer
> that this is an optimization issue. The issue does not reproduce with the
> --no-
nd the exact issue (without showing
code :()?
☆*PhistucK*
On Tuesday, September 20, 2016 at 3:54:19 PM UTC+3, Michael Hablich wrote:
> --no-crankshaft should do the trick. The name is misleading, it will also
> disable TurboFan.
>
> On Tuesday, September 20, 2016 at 1:51:51 PM UTC+2,
I have an issue where the code suddenly (since Chrome 53) gets caught up in
a cyclic recursion until it exceeds the stack size limit.
Since the code is the same, I want to try and rule out engine optimization
issues. Is there a V8 flag for disabling all of the optimizations?
☆*PhistucK
So which one should be removed? Can you merge their content in a reasonable
way and remove one of them?
☆*PhistucK*
On Tue, May 31, 2016 at 1:29 AM, Caitlin Potter
wrote:
> LGTM1 (just kidding)
>
> Sorry for not getting the launch process ball rolling myself months ago,
> that pro
I love this.
By the way, why are there two ChromeStatus entries?
https://www.chromestatus.com/feature/5644533144485888 as well as
https://www.chromestatus.com/feature/5643236399906816?
☆*PhistucK*
On Thu, May 12, 2016 at 6:34 PM, wrote:
> Super excited for this to land in V8, and then
Of course listening to the event is implemented in Blink, but it uses V8
APIs in order to break at uncaught exceptions, so I wondered if activating
this makes the execution less performant.
☆*PhistucK*
On Fri, May 27, 2016 at 6:19 PM, Yang Guo wrote:
> That doesnt sound like something in
Not throwing errors, but whether adding an event listener to the "error"
influences performance without even throwing errors. I just do not know...
☆*PhistucK*
On Tue, May 24, 2016 at 1:46 PM, Yang Guo wrote:
> Throwing errors typically are not and should not be on the critical
ome way (for example, fire it not immediately if it knows there is
more code to run at the moment, or something similar, batching and so on)?
Again, I do not know whether there is even any performance implication to
adding an "error" event listener, you probably know more.
Just an idea.
Thank you. :)
☆*PhistucK*
On Tue, May 3, 2016 at 7:45 PM, Caitlin Potter
wrote:
> V8 passes all of the relevant test262 tests included in the current
> test262 roll.
>
> Regarding interop, there's a bug in the current FireFox implementation (so
> they do not to
Are the implementations interoperable? Does V8 pass all of the relevant
test262 tests?
(By the way, I suggest adding these questions to the standard V8 intent
template)
☆*PhistucK*
On Tue, May 3, 2016 at 7:21 PM, Caitlin Potter
wrote:
> It's in v8-users, here's a copy :x
>
The post itself seems to be missing. :(
☆*PhistucK*
On Tue, May 3, 2016 at 7:13 PM, Caitlin Potter
wrote:
> +blink-dev
>>
>> --
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
> "blink-dev" group.
> To unsubscribe from this group
His message actually stated it will be removed, not deprecated, in Chrome
50.
☆*PhistucK*
On Tue, Feb 23, 2016 at 5:41 PM, 'Joe Medley' via blink-dev <
blink-...@chromium.org> wrote:
> Adam,
>
> Just to clarify, it sounds like this isn't being deprecated in M49, b
12/chrome-48-beta-present-to-cast-devices_91.html>
?
V8 people, please, holler if this is incorrect.
Thank you!
☆*PhistucK*
--
--
v8-users mailing list
v8-users@googlegroups.com
http://groups.google.com/group/v8-users
---
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
Windows 7.
☆*PhistucK*
On Wed, Oct 7, 2015 at 4:51 PM, Jochen Eisinger wrote:
> depends a bit on the OS you run chromium on?
>
> On Mon, Oct 5, 2015 at 6:55 PM PhistucK wrote:
>
>> Sure, but how do I get the output of the extension process? By enabling
>> logg
Is this in development?
☆*PhistucK*
On Thu, May 7, 2015 at 3:00 AM, 'Bill Budge' via blink-dev <
blink-...@chromium.org> wrote:
> # Contact Info
> bbu...@chromium.org, bradnel...@chromium.org
>
> # TC39 acceptance
>
> SIMD.js is a proposal in ES7
> htt
Sure, but how do I get the output of the extension process? By enabling
logging?
☆*PhistucK*
On Mon, Oct 5, 2015 at 12:52 PM, Jochen Eisinger
wrote:
> it would be interesting to have the output of the extension process when
> running chromium with --js-flags="--trace-gc --t
or a Chromium issue?
I figure it is a V8 issue, but I want to make sure, since it does involve
extensions (a background page) and DOM operations.
☆*PhistucK*
--
--
v8-users mailing list
v8-users@googlegroups.com
http://groups.google.com/group/v8-users
---
You received this message because yo
Oh, right. I get it now, thank you!
☆*PhistucK*
On Wed, Dec 17, 2014 at 9:15 PM, 'Erik Arvidsson' via blink-dev <
blink-...@chromium.org> wrote:
>
> With String.raw `\n` you get "\\n" versus with `\n` you get "\n".
>
> On Wed, Dec 17, 2014 at 2:
and it is supposed to be
String.raw("bla\n${5+6}")?
☆*PhistucK*
On Wed, Dec 17, 2014 at 7:31 PM, Joshua Bell wrote:
>
> Any caveats?
>
> Does this include the use of tags (i.e. tag`literal`;) ?
>
> Does this include String.raw()?
>
> (IMHO a subset w/o
Then I guess I am also looking to help educate about new platform features.
I understand this use case is much less needed, though.
☆*PhistucK*
On Thu, Nov 27, 2014 at 9:52 PM, Dmitry Lomov wrote:
>
>
> On Thu, Nov 27, 2014 at 8:48 PM, PhistucK wrote:
>
>> Well, you got th
ecently added to the platform and was
overridden by this website. If you expect the standard variation of this
method, perhaps polyfill it only when it does not exist.
String.prototype.includes was recently added to the platform and used by
this website. If you see issues, consider this as a possible c
*exist
'contains' is the obvious choice, 'includes' is not. This is what I mean.
While 'contains' is better named, 'includes' is less risky and therefore
should be chosen.
I am finally done, I think. Sorry for the triple post.
☆*PhistucK*
On Thu,
*shortcut
My last message was probably confusing, so continuing it -
By that, I mean that it makes more sense for 'contains' to exists already
on the web, than for 'includes'.
☆*PhistucK*
On Thu, Nov 27, 2014 at 1:55 PM, PhistucK wrote:
> This is very debateable,
This is very debateable, really. To me, it makes sense (and in my
experience, also exists) that "contains" makes more sense (as a shortcuts
for return this.indexOf(str) !== -1) than 'includes'.
☆*PhistucK*
On Thu, Nov 27, 2014 at 1:52 PM, Philip Jägenstedt
wrote:
> On
This is to ease debugging, not to solve every single case. As much as
possible, log it. On a 'best available' case.
☆*PhistucK*
On Thu, Nov 27, 2014 at 1:14 PM, 'Andreas Rossberg' via blink-dev <
blink-...@chromium.org> wrote:
> On 27 November 2014 at 11:39, Dm
Can we add a console log (not a warning) for the canary/dev/beta run
(perhaps stable, too?) for a little while to aid developers with possible
breakages?
If String.prototype.includes is overridden, deleted or accessed (called or
gotten), the log would be printed.
☆*PhistucK*
On Thu, Nov 27
Thank you for sharing! Exciting, I know a lot of developers have been
waiting for it. Hopefully Internet Explorer and Safari implements them soon
enough as well.
Do you intend to ship it with the referenced issues, or is the plan to fix
them before shipping (preferred, obviously)?
☆*PhistucK
Yes, stagnation is much better!
?!
☆*PhistucK*
On Mon, Aug 18, 2014 at 10:25 AM, newghost wrote:
>
> V8 become more and more complex.
>
>
> On Friday, August 15, 2014 4:46:39 PM UTC+8, Dmitry Lomov wrote:
>>
>> Implement ES6 classes including:
>&
(Sorry for the delayed reply, I apparently opted out of getting e-mails to
threads I start. Weird)
Great, thank you!
I updated the article a bit with the compatibility data (for Opera as well)
and removed the false Symbol.prototype.name bit.
☆*PhistucK*
On Tuesday, August 12, 2014 11:30:37
t; are supported. Symbol.iterator is supported and
now Symbol.unscopables is also supported.
What else?
Do Symbol.for and Symbol.keyFor do everything they should?
It also says Symbol.prototype.name exists only in V8 - was it removed?
Thank you!
☆*PhistucK*
On Thu, Aug 7, 2014 at 12:16 PM, Andy Wingo
Since this matches Firefox and Internet Explorer is already developing
<http://status.modern.ie/jsiteratorsietheforoffeature?term=for-> the
feature, shipping this looks great to me. :)
One step closer to ECMAScript 6! Yay.
☆*PhistucK*
On Thu, Aug 7, 2014 at 12:52 PM, Andy Wingo wrote:
(throwing is not very nice to feature detect)?
☆*PhistucK*
On Thu, Aug 7, 2014 at 12:16 PM, Andy Wingo wrote:
> For-of ("for (x of iterable) {}") is a part of ES6 [1].
>
> For-of has been shipping in Firefox since version 27 (February 2014)
> [2]. IE and Safari deve
e only intents to
ship) -
https://groups.google.com/forum/#!searchin/v8-users/subject$3Aintent%7Csort:date
☆*PhistucK*
On Thu, Mar 20, 2014 at 11:46 AM, Jochen Eisinger wrote:
> FYI - V8 promises will be enabled hopefully for M35. The v8 implementation
> was updated to reflect the Ja
announcements (VP9) exist
(mostly, but at least that). Announcements, though, not intents, which is a
shame.
☆*PhistucK*
On Mon, Sep 16, 2013 at 6:23 PM, Mike Frysinger wrote:
> Chromium isn't really part of the "web platform". it's the chrome around
> the web plat
ses it. It exposes stuff to the web platform under non
transparent, non public guidelines.
☆*PhistucK*
On Mon, Sep 16, 2013 at 6:34 PM, Mike Frysinger wrote:
> which isn't relevant. if you want to talk about standardization of the
> NaCl/PNaCl projects, then you should start threads o
Right, but Chromium exposes them to the web platform, not Blink.
☆*PhistucK*
On Mon, Sep 16, 2013 at 6:31 PM, Mike Frysinger wrote:
> NaCl/PNaCl are sep projects. they would run their own guidelines
> independently of Chromium.
> -mike
>
>
> On Mon, Sep 16, 2013 at 11:28 A
Only Chromium itself is left, right? :)
☆*PhistucK*
On Mon, Sep 16, 2013 at 5:15 PM, Alex Komoroske wrote:
> Thanks for sharing, Dmitry!
>
> Blink is just one of the sub-projects of Chromium that have web-developer
> facing features, and it's great to see other sub-projects
Not transparent quite yet - that link is not public and there is no
summary. ;)
☆*PhistucK*
On Mon, Sep 16, 2013 at 12:41 PM, Dmitry Lomov wrote:
> Following the lead of Blink in setting the web platform guidelines, we on
> the V8 team came up with a similar set of guidelines specific
This makes everything much clearer.
Thank you very much for your time.
☆*PhistucK*
On Fri, Jan 28, 2011 at 15:22, Lasse R.H. Nielsen wrote:
> If and else are not two statements. It's two different forms of the
> if-statement.
>
> The if statement is a compound statement, me
I recently found out you can actually run
this code without any error -
if (some_condition)
some_function();
else
some_other_function();
☆*PhistucK*
2011/1/28 Mikael Helbo Kjær
> Hi there.
>
>
>
> This is not the usual thing to ask here (I’d go for some sort of Javascript
>
Thank you for the very quick reply!
Got it, I think.. well, not entirely. Which is why I am asking regarding the
second code (without the semicolon) I posted in the original message.
Can you, please, clarify the behavior of the second code I posted?
☆*PhistucK*
On Fri, Jan 28, 2011 at 14:15
I am trying it within Chromium.
I posted it to v8-users, because it is a JavaScript issue, rather than a
rendering issue.
The syntax error does not show up on Internet Explorer 8. It does, however,
show up on Internet Explorer 9 (one of the platform previews).
☆*PhistucK*
On Fri, Jan 28, 2011
}
else
{
alert("a is not o");
};
Shows an alert - "a is not o".
As far as I know, "if" and "else" count as two statements. If they are, the
"else" block is actually part of the first "if" statement.
Am I misinformed, or is it a bug?
Thank you for your time!
☆*PhistucK*
--
v8-users mailing list
v8-users@googlegroups.com
http://groups.google.com/group/v8-users
and then
"282".
I have not tested Safari, or anything not on Windows.
Is this a bug?
Thank you.
☆*PhistucK*
--
v8-users mailing list
v8-users@googlegroups.com
http://groups.google.com/group/v8-users
76 matches
Mail list logo
