[Veritas-bu] Frozen/Suspended Media...

2007-08-17 Thread gudiiya
We are using Netbackup 6.0 MP4 What do other Netbackup users do with your Frozen/Suspended Media? Do you have a specific process you follow? I would like to put a process together and have contact Support. They have given me instructions to run the following on the frozen media: (Import

[Veritas-bu] Re: Status 525: Can not connect to NB-Java authentication srvc

2007-08-17 Thread selwyn
I ran into the same issue with the java client yesterday after upgrading to Netbackup 6.0 MP4. In our case I found than an older copy of vnetd had overwritten the version of vnetd that was installed with NB 6.0 MP4. After I put the correct version of vnetd back on the server the issue was r

[Veritas-bu] Netbackup 5.1

2007-08-17 Thread naymyotun
Hi all, I have my netbackup 5.1 master. When I run the MP( maintenance pack ) on it, i cannot run because the option" install to this computer" radio button is dim and cannot be selected. Another option" select the computer from available compuers from network" can be chosen. A

[Veritas-bu] Vaulting and Verifying DR backups are included...

2007-08-17 Thread gudiiya
We run vault twice a day. Our most critical servers are backed up and tapes are ejected accordingly. I need ideas on how to verify that when the vault runs that we have all our DR backups included in it. There is vault reports that run on a daily basis, and we do include them in the vault bo

Re: [Veritas-bu] Netbackup 6.5 - Anyone actually using it?

2007-08-17 Thread Ed Wilts
> Their QA really dropped the ball with this release. If by "this" you mean 6.0, you may possibly be right. With 6.5, that has yet to be proven. I feel rather sorry for the NetBackup QA group though - they have a *huge* challenge testing each release because there are so many variations po

Re: [Veritas-bu] Backing up mysql data in regular OS Filesystem backup.....

2007-08-17 Thread Marco A P D´Andrade
MySQL or any database make changes on datafiles on any time. To make a correct backup you need to lock database changes... ZIMMER, RANDY K [AG/1000] wrote: > > All, > > I should know this but I’m having a moment. I back up a client that > has mysql directory on it. We only do a OS level backups

Re: [Veritas-bu] Backing up mysql data in regular OS Filesystem backup.....

2007-08-17 Thread Ueli Schweizer
Hi Randy Most probably you are not able to recover. If you want to be sure you should use "net start mysql" in bpstart_notify and "net stop mysql" in bpend_notify. Of course if it's non Windows OS the command differs. Another way is to dump the mysql data using the mysqldump command and

[Veritas-bu] Backing up mysql data in regular OS Filesystem backup.....

2007-08-17 Thread ZIMMER, RANDY K [AG/1000]
All, I should know this but I'm having a moment. I back up a client that has mysql directory on it. We only do a OS level backups on this client. My guess is if they ever lost any mysql data they would not be able to recover from the OS level backup, is this correct? Randy K. Zimmer Sr. Unix Sy

Re: [Veritas-bu] VERITAS backup for Solaris zones

2007-08-17 Thread Mike Day
I ran into write protect errors when I tried to install the Solaris client on some zones. When I discussed this with the admin these were his questions. Can someone answer them for me please? Thanks, Mike Day "We need to know how to backup and restore a Solaris 10 server configured

Re: [Veritas-bu] Multiple tape copy question

2007-08-17 Thread BeDour, Wayne
Thanks, by using the -b option in the vmquery command and grep'ing out what I don't need, it gives me everything I need. Thanks again.. Wayne BeDour IT Unix System Administrator PH: 313-240-3374 FAX: 313-240-3065 Internet: [EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

[Veritas-bu] sreekanth adari wants to chat

2007-08-17 Thread sreekanth adari
--- sreekanth adari wants to stay in better touch using some of Google's coolest new products. If you already have Gmail or Google Talk, visit: http://mail.google.com/mail/b-1a3d2d0522-db73b27a99-e8d4bf4d7ec0cd27 You'll need to c

Re: [Veritas-bu] Multiple tape copy question

2007-08-17 Thread Darren Dunham
> Found it, bpmedialist -p volume pool name=20 If you're trying to do ejections, I don't like that one as much because it will give you media both in and out of any robot, without indidicating the current location (like vmquery will give you). -- Darren Dunham

Re: [Veritas-bu] Multiple tape copy question

2007-08-17 Thread Darren Dunham
> I'm looking but haven't found it yet so I thought I would ask while I > look. I need a command to get the volume pool and bar code of a tape > that volume pool was written to. I usally use the output of 'vmquery -a' or 'vmquery -rn <#>' and parse it. I wish you could give both robot and pool t

Re: [Veritas-bu] Multiple tape copy question

2007-08-17 Thread BeDour, Wayne
Found it, bpmedialist -p volume pool name Wayne BeDour IT Unix System Administrator PH: 313-240-3374 FAX: 313-240-3065 Internet: [EMAIL PROTECTED] From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of BeDour, Wayne Sent: Friday, August 17, 20

Re: [Veritas-bu] Multiple tape copy question

2007-08-17 Thread BeDour, Wayne
I'm looking but haven't found it yet so I thought I would ask while I look. I need a command to get the volume pool and bar code of a tape that volume pool was written to. Bottom line is I need a way to identify the copied tape so I can eject it to be sent offsite. Thanks Wayne BeDour IT U

Re: [Veritas-bu] NetBackup 6.0 MP5 on Win2K3x64 client

2007-08-17 Thread Mike Kiles
Thanks Tey. Changing the OFO to VSS seems to have done the trick. FYI: The server got rebooted during the backup when OFO was disabled or when using Veritas VSP option to backup open files. Have a great weekend. --- "Tharp, Trey" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > We're using 6.0MP4 currently with n

Re: [Veritas-bu] Very slow client

2007-08-17 Thread Clem Kruger
Hi All, This debate will continue to go on forever. I have found that hard coding works extremely well when set. In many cases setting to auto and auto still gave issues. As far as 1GB copper is concerned, the IEEE standard should be followed to the nth degree. Use a minimum of CAT 5E o

Re: [Veritas-bu] Multiple tape copy question

2007-08-17 Thread bobbyrjw
Put the second copy into a seperate Volume Pool when you set up the multiple copies. Bobby -- Original message -- From: "BeDour, Wayne" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Our environment is HP-UX 11.11, Netbackup 5.1 MP3 backing up mostly HP unix with some Sun and Windows backups.

Re: [Veritas-bu] full backup not working...

2007-08-17 Thread sreekanth adari
Hi, Even I am facing this problem with some search criteria . Did you tried from CLI using bplist command . Also check the client and server name client properties and netbackup machines and policy type windows respectively. Hope this will help With regards -Sree _

Re: [Veritas-bu] Netbackup 6.5 - Anyone actually using it?

2007-08-17 Thread Karl . Rossing
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote on 08/17/2007 01:10:06 AM: > Having spoken to a Symantec tech recently who keeps close tabs on > the dev side in the US, it doesn?t help when people hold off. He > mentioned a lot of people held of for 6.0MP1 so a lot of the issues > didn?t get fixed until MP2+3. Intere

Re: [Veritas-bu] Netbackup 6.5 - Anyone actually using it?

2007-08-17 Thread Cruice, Daniel (US - Glen Mills)
Nice response...I just got off the phone w/ Symantec and ask if anyone has reported issues w/ 6.5, and as of yet no. However I was advise by Symantec, that the Engineers at Symantec ARE advising that we all hold off on deployment of 6.5 until MP1 is release, which surprisingly enough is scheduled

Re: [Veritas-bu] Netbackup 6.5 - Anyone actually using it?

2007-08-17 Thread Karl . Rossing
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote on 08/17/2007 08:05:42 AM: > Their QA really dropped the ball > with this release. I think you have it right on with this. For instance some of the BMR bugs we have seen should have been caught in their QA. They should have caught the fact that AD wouldn't restore on a

Re: [Veritas-bu] Multiple tape copy question

2007-08-17 Thread Darren Dunham
> Our environment is HP-UX 11.11, Netbackup 5.1 MP3 backing up mostly HP > unix with some Sun and Windows backups. I need to make a daily copy of > a filesystem and send one copy offsite and leave the other in the > library. What is the best way to identify the copy so I can script an > eject fro

Re: [Veritas-bu] Netbackup 6.5 - Anyone actually using it?

2007-08-17 Thread Blaine Robison
I am using it in some of my smaller environments. so far no issues it looks like 6.0 except for some improvements in the Vault Management area. Pretty stable so far. Upgrade from 6.0 was pretty painless. Upgrade from 5.1 to 6.5 has the same pain as 6.0 to 5.1. --- "Cruice, Daniel (US - Glen Mil

Re: [Veritas-bu] Netbackup 6.5 - Anyone actually using it?

2007-08-17 Thread Jeff Lightner
Like they said going to 6.5 should be less painful than upgrading to 6.0. However, as others said it is sometimes a good idea to wait to see what the experiences of the bleeding edge folks are (especially for your production environments). The question is - would we keep going to the same dent

Re: [Veritas-bu] Netbackup 6.5 - Anyone actually using it?

2007-08-17 Thread Sesar, Steven L.
Bingo! === Steven L. Sesar Lead Operating Systems Programmer/Analyst UNIX Application Services R101 The MITRE Corporation 202 Burlington Road - MS K101 Bedford, MA 01730 tel: (781) 271-7702 fax: (781) 271-2600 mobile: (617) 519-8933 em

Re: [Veritas-bu] Netbackup 6.5 - Anyone actually using it?

2007-08-17 Thread Cruice, Daniel \(US - Glen Mills\)
I am pretty new to the whole NBU environment, pretty much got involved w/ 6.0MP4 so I missed the "fun" of the 6.0 roll-out. What is the consensus w/ 6.5? Even thought it was just released, what is the comfort level within the NBU environment? Do you guys think this release will be minimal with b

[Veritas-bu] Unable to restore after upgrade to 6.0MP5

2007-08-17 Thread ckstehman
We recently (last week) upgraded our master and media servers to NB6.0 MP5. Master and Media servers are all Windows 2003 SP2. When we tried to restore a backup to a Windows client, the backup would fail because it could not find the media. The job would start normally, locate the media ID,

[Veritas-bu] Multiple tape copy question

2007-08-17 Thread BeDour, Wayne
Our environment is HP-UX 11.11, Netbackup 5.1 MP3 backing up mostly HP unix with some Sun and Windows backups. I need to make a daily copy of a filesystem and send one copy offsite and leave the other in the library. What is the best way to identify the copy so I can script an eject from the lib

Re: [Veritas-bu] Very slow client

2007-08-17 Thread Paul Keating
any client set to auto detect is only very slow if there is a misconfiguration in the chain. auto neg has worked flawlessly for years assuming both sides are configured to auto. The documented (IEEE 802.3??) behaviour if one side is auto and the other side hardcoded is for the auto neg configured

Re: [Veritas-bu] Netbackup 6.5 - Anyone actually using it?

2007-08-17 Thread Steven L. Sesar
Ed Wilts wrote: MP1 probably won't be out until the end of the year and if nobody upgrades to 6.5, we won't see many fixes in MP1 -- that's the problem that made 6.0MP3 still a rotten release. Once users upgraded to MP3, some of the critical bug reports rolling in got the executive's a

Re: [Veritas-bu] Netbackup 6.5 - Anyone actually using it?

2007-08-17 Thread Jeff Lightner
The problem is a misconception - we all think MP stands for "maintenance patch" whereas Symantec apparently thinks it should mean "major pain". We were waiting on (6.0) MP5 and so far what I've seen on this list hasn't made me eager to install that. From: [

Re: [Veritas-bu] Netbackup 6.5 - Anyone actually using it?

2007-08-17 Thread Ed Wilts
We're trying to hold back since we got seriously burnt when we upgraded from 5.1MPsomething to 6.0MP3. However, there are a lot of things that we need in 6.5 - Linux FlashBackup, Linux ACL support, VMware consolidated backups, etc. Some things in there are nice to have but not necessarily a need