Re: Google Code goes for Mercurial

2009-04-27 Thread Ted Pavlic
> Too bad I have to learn another version control system unless > there is a good bridge For a majority of operations, the translation is simple. See: http://www.selenic.com/mercurial/wiki/index.cgi/GitConcepts Scroll to the bottom to view the "Command equivalence table". > Anyone kno

Re: Google Code goes for Mercurial

2009-04-26 Thread Douglas Drumond
> > Too bad I have to learn another version control system  unless > there is a good bridge > > Anyone know if there is a bridge? See this post on Google opensource blog about developing with Git on Google Code. http://google-opensource.blogspot.com/2008/05/develop-with-git-on-google-co

Re: Google Code goes for Mercurial

2009-04-26 Thread Steven Michalske
As a happy git user, I am just glad they are using a DVCS No surprise that the system that performed the best using their most reliable and controlled access systems ( HTTP(S) ) that they chose it. Too bad I have to learn another version control system unless there is a good bridge

Re: Google Code goes for Mercurial

2009-04-26 Thread dacresni
yeah, I thought it was Python (that influenced their decision) also. On Apr 24, 2:10 pm, Ted Pavlic wrote: > I thought some people on this list might find this interesting: > > Google Code Blog: Mercurial support for Project Hosting on Google Code > > http://google-code-updates.blogspot.com/2009

Google Code goes for Mercurial

2009-04-24 Thread Ted Pavlic
I thought some people on this list might find this interesting: Google Code Blog: Mercurial support for Project Hosting on Google Code http://google-code-updates.blogspot.com/2009/04/mercurial-support-for-project-hosting.html == We are happy to announce that Project Hosting on Google Code