On 9/6/06 12:06 PM, Patrick Middleton wrote:
On 6 Sep 2006, at 16:55, Ricardo Strausz wrote:
On Sep 5, 2006, at 21:41, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
- many of us have large volumes of ObjC code
I'm wondering: how many? Are there really a lot of us out there with
large Objective-C frameworks tha
On 6 Sep 2006, at 16:55, Ricardo Strausz wrote:
On Sep 5, 2006, at 21:41, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
- many of us have large volumes of ObjC code
I'm wondering: how many? Are there really a lot of us out there with
large Objective-C frameworks that we need to leverage in our WO apps?
+1
On Sep 5, 2006, at 21:41, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
- many of us have large volumes of ObjC code
I'm wondering: how many? Are there really a lot of us out there with
large Objective-C frameworks that we need to leverage in our WO apps?
+1
Dino
___
On 06/09/2006, at 2:28 AM, Chuck Hill wrote:
Requiring deployment on OS X is a deal breaker for many places. WO
does not have that huge of a market share to begin with, why
cripple it?
To sell Macs, of course.
At least that was going to be Apple's reason (I think, eventually)
befor
On 9/5/06 2:07 PM, Chuck Hill wrote:
On Sep 4, 2006, at 1:04 AM, Georg Tuparev wrote:
On Aug 28, 2006, at 6:10 AM, Chuck Hill wrote:
Personally, I feel that given all the improvements (and yes there
were some steps backwards) that Apple has made to WO (especially
EOF) since WO4.5 and Java'
On Sep 5, 2006, at 11:23 AM, King Chung Huang wrote:
On Sep 5, 2006, at 12:07 PM, Chuck Hill wrote:
- there are so many new cocoa technologies that we could use
(bindings, core graphics, ...)
One of the advantages of WO / Java is that it is cross platform.
Now, moving to Eclipse based t
On Sep 5, 2006, at 2:23 PM, King Chung Huang wrote:
On Sep 5, 2006, at 12:07 PM, Chuck Hill wrote:
- there are so many new cocoa technologies that we could use
(bindings, core graphics, ...)
One of the advantages of WO / Java is that it is cross platform.
Now, moving to Eclipse based to
Hi!
(defclass inYourDreamsComponent (WOComponent) ... )
:)
Yours
Miguel Arroz
On 2006/09/05, at 19:19, Ken Anderson wrote:
On Sep 5, 2006, at 2:07 PM, Chuck Hill wrote:
As an overall more productive environment, yes. As a language and
core API, never!
AMEN!
___
On Sep 5, 2006, at 12:07 PM, Chuck Hill wrote:
- there are so many new cocoa technologies that we could use
(bindings, core graphics, ...)
One of the advantages of WO / Java is that it is cross platform.
Now, moving to Eclipse based tools, it is more cross platform than
it was looking re
On Sep 5, 2006, at 2:07 PM, Chuck Hill wrote:As an overall more productive environment, yes. As a language and core API, never! AMEN! ___
Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.
Webobjects-dev mailing list (Webobjects-dev@lists
On Sep 4, 2006, at 1:04 AM, Georg Tuparev wrote:
On Aug 28, 2006, at 6:10 AM, Chuck Hill wrote:
Personally, I feel that given all the improvements (and yes there
were some steps backwards) that Apple has made to WO (especially
EOF) since WO4.5 and Java's enterprise connections (and recent
Hi there,
On 04/09/2006, at 6:04 PM, Georg Tuparev wrote:
On Aug 28, 2006, at 6:10 AM, Chuck Hill wrote:
Personally, I feel that given all the improvements (and yes there
were some steps backwards) that Apple has made to WO (especially
EOF) since WO4.5 and Java's enterprise connections (an
On Aug 28, 2006, at 6:10 AM, Chuck Hill wrote:
Personally, I feel that given all the improvements (and yes there
were some steps backwards) that Apple has made to WO (especially
EOF) since WO4.5 and Java's enterprise connections (and recent
language improvements) and ability to deploy in S
ability.
So why not both Java
and ObjC like WO4.5?
From: "Ricardo Strausz" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <webobjects-dev@lists.apple.com>
Subject: Re: WO in Java or Objective-C Date: Monday, August 28,
2006 11:43 AM Hola Chuck, Ashley y
Dana! On Aug 28,
On 8/28/06 11:15 AM, Q wrote:
There is always GnustepWeb/SOPE:x and AJRDatabase/GDL2 if you must have
that Obj-C goodness. It's not WO, but it's close.
Yeah, I'm hopefully going to be testing out SOPE soon.
--
-
Dana Kashubeck
Systems Manager
Riemer Report
Hola Chuck, Ashley y Dana!On Aug 28, 2006, at 12:06 AM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:Message: 12 Date: Sun, 27 Aug 2006 21:10:51 -0700 From: Chuck Hill <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Subject: Re: WO in Java or Objective-C (Was Re: Is WebObjects 4.5 going open source?) On Aug 27, 2006, at 9:04 PM, Ashley
On 28/08/2006, at 10:47 PM, Dana Kashubeck wrote:
Chuck Hill wrote:
On Aug 27, 2006, at 9:04 PM, Ashley Aitken wrote:
WO in Java or Objective-C? What would be most sensible going
forward?
Given that there is a lot of enterprise Java code out there that
WO in Java can and does take adv
Chuck Hill wrote:
On Aug 27, 2006, at 9:04 PM, Ashley Aitken wrote:
WO in Java or Objective-C? What would be most sensible going forward?
Given that there is a lot of enterprise Java code out there that WO in
Java can and does take advantage of (e.g. as it now uses JDBC to
replace the nee
On Aug 27, 2006, at 9:04 PM, Ashley Aitken wrote:
WO in Java or Objective-C? What would be most sensible going forward?
Given that there is a lot of enterprise Java code out there that WO
in Java can and does take advantage of (e.g. as it now uses JDBC to
replace the need for custom adap
19 matches
Mail list logo
