[Wikidata] Re: Inconsistencies on WDQS data - data reload on WDQS

On 2/27/23 10:15 AM, Guillaume Lederrey wrote: On Fri, 24 Feb 2023 at 19:31, Kingsley Idehen via Wikidata wrote: On 2/24/23 5:59 AM, Guillaume Lederrey wrote: On Thu, 23 Feb 2023 at 22:56, Kingsley Idehen wrote: On 2/23/23 3:09 PM, Guillaume Lederrey wrote: O

[Wikidata] Re: Inconsistencies on WDQS data - data reload on WDQS

On Fri, 24 Feb 2023 at 19:31, Kingsley Idehen via Wikidata < wikidata@lists.wikimedia.org> wrote: > > On 2/24/23 5:59 AM, Guillaume Lederrey wrote: > > On Thu, 23 Feb 2023 at 22:56, Kingsley Idehen > wrote: > >> >> On 2/23/23 3:09 PM, Guillaume Lederrey wrote: >> >> On Thu, 23 Feb 2023 at 16:39,

[Wikidata] Re: Inconsistencies on WDQS data - data reload on WDQS

On 2/24/23 2:25 PM, Samuel Klein wrote: This is an important topic.  Let's migrate off of Blazegraph. No, really: what's the status of WDQS backend updates , like risk projections and timelines for migration? [1

[Wikidata] Re: Inconsistencies on WDQS data - data reload on WDQS

This is an important topic. Let's migrate off of Blazegraph. No, really: what's the status of WDQS backend updates , like risk projections and timelines for migration? [1

[Wikidata] Re: Inconsistencies on WDQS data - data reload on WDQS

On 2/24/23 5:59 AM, Guillaume Lederrey wrote: On Thu, 23 Feb 2023 at 22:56, Kingsley Idehen wrote: On 2/23/23 3:09 PM, Guillaume Lederrey wrote: On Thu, 23 Feb 2023 at 16:39, Kingsley Idehen wrote: On 2/22/23 3:28 AM, Guillaume Lederrey wrote: On Wed, 22 Feb

[Wikidata] Re: Inconsistencies on WDQS data - data reload on WDQS

On 2/23/23 4:17 PM, James Heald wrote: On 23/02/2023 20:08, Kingsley Idehen via Wikidata wrote: On 2/23/23 12:19 PM, James Heald wrote: I have to say I am a bit concerned by this talk, since some of Blazegraph's "features and quirks" can be exceedingly useful. That isn't justification fo

[Wikidata] Re: Inconsistencies on WDQS data - data reload on WDQS

On Thu, 23 Feb 2023 at 22:56, Kingsley Idehen wrote: > > On 2/23/23 3:09 PM, Guillaume Lederrey wrote: > > On Thu, 23 Feb 2023 at 16:39, Kingsley Idehen > wrote: > >> >> On 2/22/23 3:28 AM, Guillaume Lederrey wrote: >> >> On Wed, 22 Feb 2023 at 00:03, Kingsley Idehen via Wikidata < >> wikidata@l

[Wikidata] Re: Inconsistencies on WDQS data - data reload on WDQS

On 2/23/23 3:09 PM, Guillaume Lederrey wrote: On Thu, 23 Feb 2023 at 16:39, Kingsley Idehen wrote: On 2/22/23 3:28 AM, Guillaume Lederrey wrote: On Wed, 22 Feb 2023 at 00:03, Kingsley Idehen via Wikidata wrote: On 2/21/23 4:05 PM, Guillaume Lederrey wrote: > H

[Wikidata] Re: Inconsistencies on WDQS data - data reload on WDQS

On 23/02/2023 20:08, Kingsley Idehen via Wikidata wrote: On 2/23/23 12:19 PM, James Heald wrote: I have to say I am a bit concerned by this talk, since some of Blazegraph's "features and quirks" can be exceedingly useful. That isn't justification for tightly-coupling a Query Tool to a Quer

[Wikidata] Re: Inconsistencies on WDQS data - data reload on WDQS

On Thu, 23 Feb 2023 at 16:39, Kingsley Idehen wrote: > > On 2/22/23 3:28 AM, Guillaume Lederrey wrote: > > On Wed, 22 Feb 2023 at 00:03, Kingsley Idehen via Wikidata < > wikidata@lists.wikimedia.org> wrote: > >> >> On 2/21/23 4:05 PM, Guillaume Lederrey wrote: >> > Hello all! >> > >> > TL;DR: We

[Wikidata] Re: Inconsistencies on WDQS data - data reload on WDQS

On 2/23/23 12:19, James Heald wrote: On Wed, 22 Feb 2023 at 00:03, Kingsley Idehen via Wikidata  wrote: On 2/21/23 4:05 PM, Guillaume Lederrey wrote: The exposed SPARQL endpoint is at the moment a direct exposition of the Blazegraph endpoint, so it does expose all the Blazegraph specific f

[Wikidata] Re: Inconsistencies on WDQS data - data reload on WDQS

On Wed, 22 Feb 2023 at 00:03, Kingsley Idehen via Wikidata wrote: On 2/21/23 4:05 PM, Guillaume Lederrey wrote: The exposed SPARQL endpoint is at the moment a direct exposition of the Blazegraph endpoint, so it does expose all the Blazegraph specific features and quirks. Is there a Que

[Wikidata] Re: Inconsistencies on WDQS data - data reload on WDQS

On 2/22/23 3:28 AM, Guillaume Lederrey wrote: On Wed, 22 Feb 2023 at 00:03, Kingsley Idehen via Wikidata wrote: On 2/21/23 4:05 PM, Guillaume Lederrey wrote: > Hello all! > > TL;DR: We expect to successfully complete the recent data reload on > Wikidata Query Service soon

[Wikidata] Re: Inconsistencies on WDQS data - data reload on WDQS

On Wed, 22 Feb 2023 at 04:45, Thad Guidry wrote: > Hi Guillaume, > > Which file system is used with Blazegraph? Is it NFS or Ext4, etc.? > Specifically, the file system used where Journal files are written and > read from? [1] > Because looking at the code, it seems there could be cases where >

[Wikidata] Re: Inconsistencies on WDQS data - data reload on WDQS

On Wed, 22 Feb 2023 at 00:03, Kingsley Idehen via Wikidata < wikidata@lists.wikimedia.org> wrote: > > On 2/21/23 4:05 PM, Guillaume Lederrey wrote: > > Hello all! > > > > TL;DR: We expect to successfully complete the recent data reload on > > Wikidata Query Service soon, but we've encountered mult

[Wikidata] Re: Inconsistencies on WDQS data - data reload on WDQS

Hi Guillaume, Which file system is used with Blazegraph? Is it NFS or Ext4, etc.? Specifically, the file system used where Journal files are written and read from? [1] Because looking at the code, it seems there could be cases where unreported errors can happen around file locking. [1] https://g

[Wikidata] Re: Inconsistencies on WDQS data - data reload on WDQS

On 2/21/23 4:05 PM, Guillaume Lederrey wrote: Hello all! TL;DR: We expect to successfully complete the recent data reload on Wikidata Query Service soon, but we've encountered multiple failures related to the size of the graph, and anticipate that this issue may worsen in the future. Althoug