Re: [Wikitech-l] New "Reference Tooltips" beta feature

On Tue, Feb 3, 2015 at 8:25 AM, Nick Wilson (Quiddity) wrote: > See also https://phabricator.wikimedia.org/T67114 (" Hovercards: Show cards > for references ") > CCing Prateek. And https://gerrit.wikimedia.org/r/#/c/139827/ for a very old patch that implements this. On 2 February 2015 at 16:49,

Re: [Wikitech-l] New "Reference Tooltips" beta feature

See also https :// phabricator.wikimedia.org /T67114 (" Hovercards: Show cards for references ") CCing Prateek. On Feb 2, 2015 5:1

Re: [Wikitech-l] New "Reference Tooltips" beta feature

Oh, I see T69282 now. But my version is much cleaner and doesn't use deprecated components :-) Il 03/02/2015 01:54, James Forrester ha scritto: Adding a Beta Feature to the Cite extension is fine. Note that there was (dormant) code in that repo to do e

Re: [Wikitech-l] New "Reference Tooltips" beta feature

Adding a Beta Feature to the Cite extension is fine. Note that there was (dormant) code in that repo to do exactly this for years, never enabled. On 2 February 2015 at 16:49, Ricordisamoa wrote: > Hi everyone, > I've come up with a rough OOjs-UI-based rewrite of the long-standing > Reference Too

[Wikitech-l] New "Reference Tooltips" beta feature

Hi everyone, I've come up with a rough OOjs-UI-based rewrite of the long-standing Reference Tooltips gadget. I'd like to see it enabled on Wikimedia sites as a beta feature, to ultimately replace the gadget, but I'm not sure it is worth an ext

Re: [Wikitech-l] [Wikimedia-l] Quarterly reviews of high priority WMF initiatives

Minutes and slides from three recent quarterly review meetings held last week are now available: Language Engineering team: https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/WMF_Metrics_and_activities_meetings/Quarterly_reviews/Language_Engineering/January_2015 MediaWiki Core team https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/W

Re: [Wikitech-l] Fwd: Phabricator monthly statistics - 2015-01

On Sun, Feb 1, 2015 at 11:49 AM, Quim Gil wrote: > Number of active users (any activity) in (2015-01): 669 > Number of task authors in (2015-01): 401 > Number of users who have closed tasks in (2015-01): 199 > How does that compare to the last months of Bugzilla? Also, if there is an easy way to

[Wikitech-l] Grafana production configs

Hello, I'm working on adding performance instrumentation to the Parsoid codebase with statsd/node-txstatsd, and then visualizing the metrics via Grafana. I'm at the stage where I'm looking to add the metrics' namespaces and schema to the WMF Grafana configs. It looks like WMF has Grafana working

[Wikitech-l] Collections-->Project: Gather

Hi Folks, Thank you for your feedback around the collections project*. One of the strongest pieces of feedback was that the project name was easily confused with the collections:extension. Yes. As a result, the collections project is now named "project gather". This is effective immediately. Th

[Wikitech-l] SMWCon Spring 2015 Tickets Now Available!

(Apologies in advance for the cross-post) I’d like to let you know that tickets are now available for SMWCon Spring 2015. Get them here: http://smwcons2015.eventbrite.com SMWCon (http://semantic-mediawiki.org/wiki/SMWCon_Spring_2015), the twice-yearly conference about Semantic MediaWiki, is com

Re: [Wikitech-l] C2.com switches to single-page app & distributed nodejs backend

Oh, cool. +1 for progressive enhancement! On Mon, Feb 2, 2015 at 9:47 AM, Max Semenik wrote: > Actually, it has a nice HTML-only fallback, and Googlebot executes JS these > days. > > On Mon, Feb 2, 2015 at 8:53 AM, James Douglas > wrote: > > > This is an interesting change. I wonder how they

Re: [Wikitech-l] C2.com switches to single-page app & distributed nodejs backend

Actually, it has a nice HTML-only fallback, and Googlebot executes JS these days. On Mon, Feb 2, 2015 at 8:53 AM, James Douglas wrote: > This is an interesting change. I wonder how they keep the site accessible > by search engine indexers, and folks with older/limited/text-only browsers > or li

Re: [Wikitech-l] Improving our code review efficiency

But this doesn't remove it from the projects review queue (or search queries, if you just use "project:mediawiki/extensions/MobileFrontend status:open"). Kind regards, Florian -Ursprüngliche Nachricht- Von: wikitech-l-boun...@lists.wikimedia.org [mailto:wikitech-l-boun...@lists.wikimedi

Re: [Wikitech-l] C2.com switches to single-page app & distributed nodejs backend

This is an interesting change. I wonder how they keep the site accessible by search engine indexers, and folks with older/limited/text-only browsers or limited connectivity. On Mon, Feb 2, 2015 at 8:20 AM, Gabriel Wicke wrote: > The original wiki is getting a technical facelift: > >- http:/

Re: [Wikitech-l] [Engineering] DevSummit appreciation

I want to hook up to this e-mail from @Tony Thomas. First: Special thanks to Jon, Quim and Rachel (and the Wikimedia travel team!) to make it possible to be there so shortly. It was a great experience, see all people "in real live and in color", talk to them and be part of the discussions, prese

Re: [Wikitech-l] Beta bounce handling completed with new beta-mx

> Hello, > > Happy to inform that beta got is now routing through its new working mx ( > mx.beta.wmflabs.org ). Great work, Tony! -- | Greg GrossmeierGPG: B2FA 27B1 F7EB D327 6B8E | | identi.ca: @gregA18D 1138 8E47 FAC8 1C7D | _

[Wikitech-l] C2.com switches to single-page app & distributed nodejs backend

The original wiki is getting a technical facelift: - http://c2.com/cgi/wiki?WikiWikiSystemNotice - http://c2.fed.wiki.org/view/welcome-visitors - https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=8983158 Gabriel ___ Wikitech-l mailing list Wikitech-l@lists.

[Wikitech-l] Beta bounce handling completed with new beta-mx

Hello, Happy to inform that beta got is now routing through its new working mx ( mx.beta.wmflabs.org ). We had discussions regarding adding a separate mx for beta back in[1] and [2]. Today, we have the mx records added for beta ( dig +short -t mx beta.wmflabs.org ) and beta is sending out mails

Re: [Wikitech-l] Add members to extension owners

On Fri, Jan 30, 2015 at 11:18 AM, Stephan Gambke wrote: > Are there any plans to streamline that process? > > Stephan > > > http://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/Gerrit/Project_ownership#To_make_a_new_Project_Owner Yes, and community input is welcome: Migrate Gerrit project ownership request system (

Re: [Wikitech-l] Fwd: Phabricator monthly statistics - 2015-01

Hi, On Sun, Feb 1, 2015 at 11:16 PM, Pine W wrote: > Thanks. Just wondering, do we have a graph somewhere that shows trends? > For Bugzilla we had http://korma.wmflabs.org/browser/its.html and http://korma.wmflabs.org/browser/bugzilla_response_time.html but now we miss graphs for Maniphest (see

Re: [Wikitech-l] Fwd: Phabricator monthly statistics - 2015-01

On Sun, Feb 1, 2015 at 2:16 PM, Pine W wrote: > Hi Quim, > > Thanks. Just wondering, do we have a graph somewhere that shows trends? > There is quite a gap between tasks created and tasks closed, and if that's > normal each month then there needs to be some thought about how to fix the > gap, yes

Re: [Wikitech-l] Fwd: Phabricator monthly statistics - 2015-01

It would be interesting to compare our trends to those of other open source projects with open bug or task trackers. Pine On Feb 1, 2015 7:47 PM, "James Forrester" wrote: > On 1 February 2015 at 14:16, Pine W wrote: > > > Hi Quim, > > > > Thanks. Just wondering, do we have a graph somewhere tha