Dan Kegel wrote:
> I am sick and tired of us wimping out and pointing people
> to dosbox. Wine should be able to run DOS apps.
> See http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9178 for
> details. Mikolaj even provided a patch that gets it working.
> IMHO this needs fixing for wine 1.0.
> - Dan
>
>
Dan Kegel wrote:
> On Dec 24, 2007 10:36 AM, Kevin Koltzau <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>> I also tried the DOS version, and that just hung (grumble).
>> pkzip 2.5 for dos works fine under dosbox
>
> I am sick and tired of us wimping out and pointing people
> to dosbox. Wine should be able to run
> "Roderick Colenbrander" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > +if (data->client_window)
> > +{
> > +int w = data->client_rect.right - data->client_rect.left;
> > +int h = data->client_rect.bottom - data->client_rect.top;
> > +
> > +TRACE("Updating client window 0x%lx
On Dec 24, 2007 9:59 AM, Dan Kegel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Dec 24, 2007 7:58 AM, Adam Petaccia <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > I'm not a developer, but it seems to me that people google search when
> > something /doesn't/ work. Few people google wine+world of warcraft (or
> > WoW) because i
On Dec 24, 2007 10:36 AM, Kevin Koltzau <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > I also tried the DOS version, and that just hung (grumble).
>
> pkzip 2.5 for dos works fine under dosbox
I am sick and tired of us wimping out and pointing people
to dosbox. Wine should be able to run DOS apps.
See http://bug
On 25/12/2007, Alexander Dorofeyev <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> +if ((pos[3] < 1e-8) && (pos[3] > -1e-8))
You should probably use eps and -eps there, like the rest of the code does.
Also, please write a test case to prevent this from regressing in the future.
"Roderick Colenbrander" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> +if (data->client_window)
> +{
> +int w = data->client_rect.right - data->client_rect.left;
> +int h = data->client_rect.bottom - data->client_rect.top;
> +
> +TRACE("Updating client window 0x%lx to %dx%x,%dx%d\n
Jeremy White <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> --- a/include/wintab.h
> +++ b/include/wintab.h
> @@ -525,6 +525,23 @@ typedef struct tagROTATION { /* 1.1 */
> #endif
>
> /***
> + * WACOM WINTAB EXTENSIONS TO SUPPORT CSR_TYPE
> + *
Hi Folks,
Okay, I've now spent some time putting some love into wintab.dll,
and I've now gotten to the point where Photoshop 7 works properly,
no matter what order your X devices are in.
I've also improved behavior of a number of other test programs
I worked with as I struggled with Photoshop.
B
On Monday 24 December 2007 12:13:10 pm Dan Kegel wrote:
> To look into
> http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3620
> I wanted to create a 16 bit self-extracting archive.
>
> I also tried the DOS version, and that just hung (grumble).
pkzip 2.5 for dos works fine under dosbox
Quoting Dan Kegel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
I have tried with WinRAR 1.54, which is available at
http://www.oldversion.com/program.php?n=winrar, and it works. I am not
sure if that's 16 or 32-bit, though. The resulting executable does not
work, by the way.
> To look into
> http://bugs.winehq.org
> On Dec 24, 2007 7:58 AM, Adam Petaccia <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > I'm not a developer, but it seems to me that people google search when
> > something /doesn't/ work. Few people google wine+world of warcraft (or
> > WoW) because it works out of the box for most people, for example.
>
> By t
To look into
http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3620
I wanted to create a 16 bit self-extracting archive.
So I downloaded
ftp://ftp.pkware.com/pk263w16.exe
and followed the instructions in Help for creating a windows self-extractor.
Sadly, 'file' on the resulting .exe says it's just a zip file
On Dec 24, 2007 7:58 AM, Adam Petaccia <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I'm not a developer, but it seems to me that people google search when
> something /doesn't/ work. Few people google wine+world of warcraft (or
> WoW) because it works out of the box for most people, for example.
By that argument
> Perhaps a silly and/or wrong observation but, is this in an effort to
> support multiple cursors?
No, not at all. It's fixing a pretty awful bug; the old code
relied on the physical device id exactly lining up with the cursor
number.
Cheers,
Jeremy
Maarten Lankhorst wrote:
> Hi Dan,
>
> Dan Kegel schreef:
>> Not a real question, but I thought this graph was interesting:
>>
>> http://www.google.com/trends?q=dreamweaver+linux%2C+%22world+of+warcraft%22+linux%2C++itunes+linux%2C+photoshop+linux
>>
>> It seems iTunes on Linux is twice as popular
On Sun, 2007-12-23 at 20:10 -0800, Dan Kegel wrote:
> Not a real question, but I thought this graph was interesting:
>
> http://www.google.com/trends?q=dreamweaver+linux%2C+%22world+of+warcraft%22+linux%2C++itunes+linux%2C+photoshop+linux
>
> It seems iTunes on Linux is twice as popular a query
Hi Dan,
Dan Kegel schreef:
> Not a real question, but I thought this graph was interesting:
>
> http://www.google.com/trends?q=dreamweaver+linux%2C+%22world+of+warcraft%22+linux%2C++itunes+linux%2C+photoshop+linux
>
> It seems iTunes on Linux is twice as popular a query as Photoshop on Linux.
> No
OK,
by meanings - Dreamweaver and Photoshop are important - iTunes are not
so important ..but a lot more peoples know about ITunes.
2007/12/24, Dan Kegel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> Not a real question, but I thought this graph was interesting:
>
> http://www.google.com/trends?q=dreamweaver+linux%2C+
19 matches
Mail list logo
