Hi,
some remarks
+if (((*poutscale).x==0)||((*poutscale).y==0)||((*poutscale).z==0))
should be
+if ((poutscale->x==0)||(poutscale->y==0)||(poutscale->z==0))
No need to redefine a module fonction
Replace +poutscale->x=module(pM->m[0][0],pM->m[0][1],pM->m[0][2]);
by
+
poutscale->x=D3D
"Dan Hipschman" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> +#include
...
> DWORD WINAPI GetSecurityInfo(
> HANDLE hObject, SE_OBJECT_TYPE ObjectType,
> @@ -2718,8 +2735,44 @@ DWORD WINAPI GetSecurityInfo(
> PSECURITY_DESCRIPTOR *ppSecurityDescriptor
> )
> {
> - FIXME("stub!\n");
> - return ERROR_BAD_
"Jeff Latimer" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> --- a/dlls/user32/dde_client.c
> +++ b/dlls/user32/dde_client.c
> @@ -520,6 +520,7 @@ static WDML_QUEUE_STATE
> WDML_HandleRequestReply(WDML_CONV* pConv, MSG* msg, WDML
> case WM_DDE_DATA:
> UnpackDDElParam(WM_DDE_DATA, msg->lParam, &uiLo, &
On Tue, Aug 5, 2008 at 3:15 AM, Alexandre Julliard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> That's ugly, you shouldn't need such special handling here, you should
> simply fall through to the normal comparisons which should give the
> correct results.
Falling through didn't work. CompareStringW does not like
2008/8/5 David Adam <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> Hi,
>
> some remarks
>
> +if (((*poutscale).x==0)||((*poutscale).y==0)||((*poutscale).z==0))
> should be
> +if ((poutscale->x==0)||(poutscale->y==0)||(poutscale->z==0))
>
To add to that, you really should test your error paths in your test case.
A
2008/8/5 Luis Busquets <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> +static const D3DVERTEXELEMENT9 lc={0xFF,0,D3DDECLTYPE_UNUSED,0,0,0};
What do you use this for?
> +while ((pdecl+i)->Stream!=0xFF)
> +{
> +i++;
You might as well increment pdecl itself.
Also keep in mind that Alexandre won't be back be
Folks,
I'm leaving on vacation, so there won't be any commits for a while. Of
course thanks to git that shouldn't prevent you from filling my mailbox
with patches... I'll be back on the 18th, and release 1.1.3 will thus be
on the 22nd.
--
Alexandre Julliard
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
They should be fine. I will get them in sometime today, and clean them
up if that is even needed.
Thanks for the work.
Francois Gouget wrote:
> On Mon, 4 Aug 2008, Jeremy Newman wrote:
>
>> I have no intention of removing the WWN box. Removing it will leave a
>> large gaping hole on that right
On 8/5/08, Paul Vriens <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Ismael Barros wrote:
>> Tests for CreateGroup
>> Fixed the implementation of CreateGroup and CreateGroupInGroup so that
>> it doesn't segfault when the service provider is not initialized
>>
>> ---
>> dlls/dplayx/dplay.c| 10 ++
>> dlls
On Fri, Aug 01, 2008 at 06:23:43PM +0400, Сергей Новосёлов wrote:
> We'd like to continue develop your version. When are you going
> to remain this project?
Great! Please send me patches and I'll apply them. I'll probably
merge with WineHQ on every WineHQ release.
I'm not planning on doing any
I've written some code for the chroot, though it has proven to be harder
than I taught it would, especially because of all the development tools
and libraries that need to be copied into the chroot.
Right now it will only work on Gentoo, other distributions will require
some fine-tuning of paths, e
Paul Vriens wrote:
> Just some things that caught my attention:
>
> Could you trim the length for some of the lines somewhat? I also don't think
> you
> need all those comments in the first call to ToUnicode.
>
> There is a C++ comment in the patch, should be avoided.
>
> And as a last one, is it
Dmitry Timoshkov wrote:
> "Anatoly Lyutin" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>> I run test-cases on 98 and XP and I can not see where this messages
>> have been posted in tests. In Wine this messages have not processing.
>>
>> Does anybody something know about this?
>
> Try to run the tests in a palett
"Lei Zhang" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> diff --git a/dlls/oleaut32/vartype.c b/dlls/oleaut32/vartype.c
> index daeac85..713ebae 100644
> --- a/dlls/oleaut32/vartype.c
> +++ b/dlls/oleaut32/vartype.c
> @@ -6942,7 +6942,24 @@ HRESULT WINAPI VarBstrCmp(BSTR pbstrLeft, BSTR
> pbstrRight, LCID lcid,
Piotr Caban <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> +static HRESULT namespacePush(saxlocator *locator, int ns)
> +{
> +if(locator->nsStackLast+1>locator->nsStackSize)
> +{
> +locator->nsStackSize += STACKALLOCATIONSIZE;
> +locator->nsStack = HeapReAlloc(GetProcessHeap(), 0,
> +
Hi,
1. The order of
+/*The components of the translation transformation vector are straigth in
the fourth column of the transformation matrix*/
+(*pouttranslation).x=(*pM).m[3][0];
+(*pouttranslation).y=(*pM).m[3][1];
+(*pouttranslation).z=(*pM).m[3][2];
+
+/*Let's calculate
"Hongbo Ni" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I have posted a another patch regarding to windows hook into another
> process.
> http://www.winehq.org/pipermail/wine-patches/2008-August/059069.html
>
> Basically it change LoadlibraryW to LoadlibraryExW with Alt-path.
>
> Could you please let me know
17 matches
Mail list logo
