"Austin English" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> -/* test FindWindow behavior */
> +SetLastError(0xdeadbeef);
> +HWND hWnd = FindWindow("SomeWindowThatDoesNotExist", NULL);
> +if(hWnd) {
> + printf("hWnd not NULL");
> +}
> +else {
> +
> + todo_wine
> + ok(GetLastE
Hi Hwang,
Thank you for helping localize Wine in Korean!
According to our automated patch checker,
http://kegel.com/wine/patchwatcher/results/
your patches did not apply easily. You should
probably repost them with all filenames as if
you were one level above the wine tree. e.g.
instead of
--
On Wed, 2008-08-13 at 19:32 +0100, Reece Dunn wrote:
> 2008/8/13 Adam Petaccia <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> > Its customary to make a function return NotImplemented in Gdiplus, if
> > its just a dummy function that does nothing and returns. But .NET seems
> > to check for this and throw an exception, cra
Its customary to make a function return NotImplemented in Gdiplus, if
its just a dummy function that does nothing and returns. But .NET seems
to check for this and throw an exception, crashing the program anyway.
See bug http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12951 for details, but
originally a p
Patchwatcher is online and giving reasonably good
feedback on the patch stream. The bug that caused
every patch to be marked 'failed tests' is fixed, and
the blacklist is expanded enough that false regressions
seem to be rare.
There are still bugs:
1. the dashboard shows no status column for
http
On Tue, Aug 12, 2008 at 11:44:20PM -0600, Vitaliy Margolen wrote:
> While debugging some force-feedback issues ran into an interesting problem.
> The size of one struct from include/linux differs between 32-bit and 64-bit.
> That wouldn't be a major problem except that size is the part of the ioc
*Storesonline, Ecommerce hosting solution - how to avoid mistakes that put
your business at risk*
Building an e-business inevitably requires a dedicated ecommerce hosting
solution that can support the infrastructures. There are plenty of areas to
take care of. Depending on your business types, you
"Ilya Shpigor" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Best regards
> Ilya Shpigor.
This version of the patch hasn't changed anything since my previous
comments.
--
Dmitry.
On Wednesday 13 August 2008, thacrazze wrote:
> Hello,
>
> why are no GIT changes since 7 days? Exists a right problem with Microsoft?
>
> And what's with the planned 1.1.3?
It *might* have something to do with this:
On Tuesday 05 August 2008, Alexandre Julliard wrote:
> Folks,
>
> I'm leaving on
"thacrazze" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> why are no GIT changes since 7 days? Exists a right problem with Microsoft?
>
> And what's with the planned 1.1.3?
http://www.winehq.org/pipermail/wine-devel/2008-August/068041.html
--
Dmitry.
"Vitaliy Margolen" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> While debugging some force-feedback issues ran into an interesting problem.
> The size of one struct from include/linux differs between 32-bit and 64-bit.
> That wouldn't be a major problem except that size is the part of the ioctl()
> request. Wh
Hello,
why are no GIT changes since 7 days? Exists a right problem with Microsoft?
And what's with the planned 1.1.3?
Best regards,
thacrazze
2008/8/13 Michael Karcher <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> Yes, but if wine runs on a 64 bit kernel, the kernel does not handle the
> request, as it only recognizes the 64 bit request, if I understood
> Vitaliy correct. I consider that a kernel bug.
>
I'd say so, yeah.
Am Mittwoch, den 13.08.2008, 09:07 +0200 schrieb H. Verbeet:
> Maybe I misunderstand the issue, but doesn't Wine currently always get
> compiled for 32-bit? (Iow, we always get the 32-bit version of the
> structure)
Yes, but if wine runs on a 64 bit kernel, the kernel does not handle the
request, a
2008/8/12 Dan Kegel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> d3d9:visual.c
What kind of failures are you seeing there, and with which drivers?
(The test should at least pass with recent Mesa versions as long as
the GLSL extensions are disabled)
2008/8/13 Vitaliy Margolen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> While debugging some force-feedback issues ran into an interesting problem.
> The size of one struct from include/linux differs between 32-bit and 64-bit.
> That wouldn't be a major problem except that size is the part of the ioctl()
> request. Whic
16 matches
Mail list logo
