On Fri, Jun 12, 2009 at 4:24 PM, Noah Fields wrote:
> configure: WARNING: mach-o/dyld_images.h: present but cannot be compiled
> configure: WARNING: mach-o/dyld_images.h: check for missing prerequisite
> headers?
> configure: WARNING: mach-o/dyld_images.h: see the Autoconf documentation
> confi
On Fri, Jun 12, 2009 at 12:32 PM, Paul Vriens wrote:
> Dmitry Timoshkov wrote:
>>
>> ---
>> dlls/user32/message.c | 2 +
>> dlls/user32/tests/msg.c | 54
>> +++
>> server/queue.c | 10 +++-
>> 3 files changed, 65 insertions(+), 1 de
configure: WARNING: mach-o/dyld_images.h: present but cannot be compiled
configure: WARNING: mach-o/dyld_images.h: check for missing prerequisite
headers?
configure: WARNING: mach-o/dyld_images.h: see the Autoconf documentation
configure: WARNING: mach-o/dyld_images.h: section "Present But
>Subject: Re: Disable forum edits
>
>On Fri, Jun 12, 2009 at 12:51 PM, Jeremy Newman wrote:
>> Editing disabled.
>>
>> -Newman
>
>Thanks!
>
+1
James
On Fri, Jun 12, 2009 at 12:51 PM, Jeremy Newman wrote:
> Editing disabled.
>
> -Newman
Thanks!
--
-Austin
Editing disabled.
-Newman
Austin English wrote:
On Mon, Jun 8, 2009 at 11:12 PM, Dmitry Timoshkov wrote:
"Igor Tarasov" wrote:
2009/6/9 Austin English :
Users are editing their posts when asked for terminal output/wine
version/etc. Those of us on the mailing list side don't get this
inform
Dmitry Timoshkov wrote:
---
dlls/user32/message.c |2 +
dlls/user32/tests/msg.c | 54 +++
server/queue.c | 10 +++-
3 files changed, 65 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
Hi Dmitry,
These new tests introduce some failures on Win9x
On Thu, Jun 11, 2009 at 10:39 PM, Austin English wrote:
> AJ, looks like your 'configure: Detect the appropriate form for the
> __ASM_GLOBAL_FUNC macro.' patch broke the compile on OS X. Could you
> have a look?
>
> gcc -m32 -c -I. -I. -I../../include -I../../include -D__WINESRC__
> -D_REENTRANT -
On Fri, Jun 12, 2009 at 4:12 AM, Alexandre Julliard wrote:
> Austin English writes:
>
>> AJ, looks like your 'configure: Detect the appropriate form for the
>> __ASM_GLOBAL_FUNC macro.' patch broke the compile on OS X. Could you
>> have a look?
>
> It works fine here. What does your __ASM_GLOBAL_F
On Do, 2009-06-11 at 20:52 +0200, Damjan Jovanovic wrote:
> +
> +if (wEventId & SHCNE_ASSOCCHANGED)
> +{
> +TRACE("refreshing file type associations");
> +RefreshFileTypeAssociations();
> +}
"\n" is missing in the TRACE.
The helper function looks like an API call.
Plea
On Do, 2009-06-11 at 11:16 -0400, Steven Edwards wrote:
> +"expand [-r] source destination\n"
> +"expand -r source [destination]\n"
> +"expand -D source.cab [-F:Files]\n"
> +"expand source.cab -F:files destination\n"
> +"\n"
> +" -rRename expanded files.\n"
> +
Jeff Latimer wrote:
Paul Vriens wrote:
The problem with both VirtualBox and QEMU/KVM seems to be supporting
older Windows versions as guests (< NT4).
I don't understand VirtualBox says it supports up to Windows 7 and I
have XP running. I have had QEMU/KVM running XP. What annoyed me about
VM
Paul Vriens wrote:
The problem with both VirtualBox and QEMU/KVM seems to be supporting
older Windows versions as guests (< NT4).
I don't understand VirtualBox says it supports up to Windows 7 and I
have XP running. I have had QEMU/KVM running XP. What annoyed me about
VMWare Server was the b
Kai Blin wrote:
On Thursday 11 June 2009 14:58:14 David Gerard wrote:
VMWare is reputedly better - it's the oldest common VM software and
its emulation is very seasoned, well-tested and robust.
If you discount that last I checked, VMware still couldn't do IPv6 in their
virtual networks, and
2009/6/12 Kai Blin :
> On Thursday 11 June 2009 14:58:14 David Gerard wrote:
>> VMWare is reputedly better - it's the oldest common VM software and
>> its emulation is very seasoned, well-tested and robust.
> If you discount that last I checked, VMware still couldn't do IPv6 in their
> virtual ne
2009/6/12 LiuYuanxi :
> In dlls/ntdll/file.c: line 362
>
> if ((status = server_get_unix_fd( fileio->io.handle, FILE_READ_DATA, &fd,
> &needs_close, NULL, NULL )))
> break;
>
> Is this if always true?
>
No, only if server_get_unix_fd() returns a n
In dlls/ntdll/file.c: line 362
if ((status = server_get_unix_fd( fileio->io.handle, FILE_READ_DATA, &fd,
&needs_close, NULL, NULL )))
break;
Is this if always true?
_
MSN 表情魔法书,改变你的
Austin English writes:
> AJ, looks like your 'configure: Detect the appropriate form for the
> __ASM_GLOBAL_FUNC macro.' patch broke the compile on OS X. Could you
> have a look?
It works fine here. What does your __ASM_GLOBAL_FUNC macro look like in
include/config.h?
--
Alexandre Julliard
jul
18 matches
Mail list logo